![]() |
cool video Tom
|
Dood.... fun stuff right there! Haha
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk |
Love the in car prep sequence!
The Ben has more throw than I expected. Maybe it is close to a 997 SSK |
Quote:
|
Once I get back home I will be installing the SRS (Stone Rally Sport) shift handle. Stay tuned!
|
Data, data, data!
I had my car dyno tested again at the PCA Festival of Speed. This was a different dyno but both were the same manufacturer, same software, and same environmental condition algorithms. The results are within range of 8 hp and an average of 4hp. Test 2: High 193.53 Low 190.45 Ave 191.93 Test 1: High 189.51 Low 185.75 Ave 187.85 I still think that this is a bit lower than the expected ~195hp ave. If you look at the A/F ratio from the second test (top image above), it shows that the engine is running a bit lean. This implies that the cylinders aren't getting enough fuel. I had the fuel pump tested which was fine. Then we pulled the injectors and sent them out for test with results of low flow rates in 3 cyls. This might be the cause of the lean condition so we had them cleaned and calibrated. I'll get another dyno test to see if the injector cleaning made any difference as soon as the opportunity presents itself. http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1555778744.jpg http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1553632498.jpg http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1555780518.jpg |
Good stuff -- thanks for sharing... Did your Butt Dyno tell you anything?
Mike Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Here is a short video from Race #3 at the Festival of Speed. Lots of really close racing at the start when everyone is battling for every position. As an amateur racer, it doesn't get much better than this.
Full screen HD with sound for the best experience! <iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/V22aQJARkRU" frameborder="0" allow="accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture" allowfullscreen></iframe> |
Cool video as always. Thanks for sharing.
Did the 911 miss a shift coming off the oval? He lost a lot of positions. California Speedway has an interesting format / layout for their roval. Looks like they have several variations that they use. Transitioning onto the banking is brutal. It was that way at Kansas Speedway too. Very hard on LCA bushings. |
Nice, thanks for sharing! I see the 318 car has "rub strips" down its sides, as in rubbin' is racin'?
|
Quote:
Quote:
And yes, transitioning onto the banking is really hard on the suspension and there is definitely a trade off - the quickest line though the sweeping left turn before the banking is tight to the inside like I ran but this also places the car at a greater angle of incidence to the banking which results in a harsh transition. Alternatively, you can drive wider through the final corner and then you'll exit more alongside the banking and merge where the angle isn't as abrupt but then you loose speed and distance to the cars on the other (faster) line. |
Quote:
|
NO rub strips, just painted lines. Missed you at Spring Mountain Tom
|
Testing, testing... 1,2,3...
I recently tested a SCCA Spec Racer Ford (SRF) at Buttonwillow Raceway! What an amazing car. There isn't much comparison between a street-based race car like the Spec Boxster and a purpose-built, tube frame, inboard shock car like the SRF. The SRF was an absolute blast to drive. The suspension of the SRF is perfectly balanced in terms of stiffness vs grip. The car probably has 30% more grip than a SPB due to the much improved suspension and, of course, the Hoosier slicks. Even though the tire width of the SRF is relatively small (185F/205R), the SRF is about 4-5 sec's per lap faster than a SPB at Buttonwillow. That performance comes from the greater cornering ability and a better power/weight ratio (SRF is 135 hp in a 1560lb car = 11.5 lb/hp vs Boxster 200 hp in a 2650lb car = 13.2 lb/hp). Both of those weights include fuel and the driver. The SRF feels very light and agile. The #11 that I drove was well balanced and didn't understeer nor oversteer. I was consistently over-braking since my brain was calibrated to the much heavier SPB. It really doesn't take much brake to slow a 1560 lb car (that is 900 lbs less than a SPB and 1400 lbs lighter than a stock Boxster!) There are two things that I want to get out of my racing experience: (1) the opportunity to drive some great race cars, and (2) the opportunity to drive some great race tracks. This is a step towards (1). Oh, and I'm working on (2) also! Thanks to Alexander Bermudez, three-time SCCA National SRF Champion Mike Miserendino, Mark Bellangee, and the entire MBI Race Team for making this happen and graciously hosting me for the day. http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1556681726.jpg http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1556681890.jpg http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1556681909.jpg http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1556681925.jpg http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1556681938.jpg |
Ya, those parallel arms really make a difference in handling. I never understood why Porsche has stayed with the MacPherson strut for so long. Even the lowly Miata has parallel arms!
As you said, the SRF is several seconds a lap faster than SPB at every track, especially with the new engine in SRF3. At Thunderhill, the records are 1:58.7 vs. 2:02.7--4 seconds. The SRF3 is 135 HP and 131 ft-lbs at the crank for 1560 lbs (Ratio W/(P+T)=5.86), while the SPB is, I estimate, 232 HP and 209 ft-lbs at the crank for 2650 lbs (ratio=6.01). But it's really about the tires, weight, and handling, and not the acceleration. And then there's the costs. The SRF3 costs 25% less per hour to operate than the SPB. And it's not even the cheapest purpose-built car--Formula Ford/Club Ford and Formula Vee/First are all cheaper to operate per hour than SRF3, and FF/CF are faster than SRF3. Spreadsheet. I'm not sure why so many people stick with street-based race cars. Is it the perceived safety issues of an open-top or open-wheel car? Greg |
Quote:
Greg, that is a really comprehensive table of race car class info! I think part of the allure of racing a street-based car is exactly that - it is easy for everyone to relate to it since it looks like a street car. That point notwithstanding, your point about costs is very accurate. The thought about safety concerns for an open cockpit race car is valid. My wife isn't exactly a fan of open cockpit race cars. But after driving the SRF, I can say that I wouldn't have any safety concerns - the roll bar is super strong and you sit much farther down in the car than it appears when looking at the car. |
New pads and rotors.
During caliper re-installation, I ran into a problem described here: http://986forum.com/forums/boxster-general-discussions/75217-stripped-brake-caliper-bolt-hub-threads.html I decided to try Pagid Black RS-14 pads and solid rotors all around this time. These pads are known for incredible grip and being somewhat hard on rotors. In fact, some drivers report that they are either full ON or full OFF and thus, hard to modulate. I'll let you know what I think in a couple of weeks after racing at Willow Springs. This is a side-by-side pic of the old Pagid Orange front pad and the new Black. The heat turns the originally orange pad backing plate a nice shade of brown! http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1557451564.jpg The new Pagid Blacks... http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1557451580.jpg Everything done and ready to roll! http://986forum.com/forums/uploads02...1557451598.jpg |
When I drove a spec Boxster at The FIRM it was a big difference over my regular stock heavy Boxster. So to a lesser degree I can feel.what you felt in the SRF. I was braking too early, unused to the better grip of the Toyo RR tires and the 255 fronts, so much grip!
|
Quote:
In the Boxster, high grip 255's in the front really let you stand on the brakes along with way more grip at corner turn in. That is really how the Boxster should have come from the factory. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:30 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website