Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-13-2025, 01:15 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,614
Quote:
Originally Posted by piper6909 View Post
I read somewhere there's a school of thought that the way some halves were machined can cause IMSB failures and that if it hasn't failed after so many miles, then the probability of failure is low. I don't subscribe to it, I only mention it as the only possible justification for your what mechanic said.
I think you are referring to the RMS seal failure issue, which was the result of two failure types:
  1. The original seal was a Viton based unit that did not have the life expectancy and was replaced by a PTFE based seal, which worked.
  2. Out of round case openings which would leak regardless of the seal material used. These were the result of machining issues and Porsche released a "concentricity" test tool that was a go/no go test that was used if the engine was still under warranty; if it failed, the engine was replaced as it could not be corrected in the car.

There was also a non concentric IMS shaft problem, where the shaft would wobble because the IMS bearing center line the the shaft center line were not the same. This was mostly in the early 986 engines and was enoght of a problem that engine rebuilders had problems finding enough usable shafts to reassemble the engines, but that had nothing to do with the engine cases, it was a shaft assembly problem.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein

Last edited by JFP in PA; 04-13-2025 at 01:21 PM.
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2025, 01:51 PM   #2
Registered User
 
piper6909's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: PA
Posts: 1,720
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA View Post
I think you are referring to the RMS seal failure issue, which was the result of two failure types:
  1. The original seal was a Viton based unit that did not have the life expectancy and was replaced by a PTFE based seal, which worked.
  2. Out of round case openings which would leak regardless of the seal material used. These were the result of machining issues and Porsche released a "concentricity" test tool that was a go/no go test that was used if the engine was still under warranty; if it failed, the engine was replaced as it could not be corrected in the car.

There was also a non concentric IMS shaft problem, where the shaft would wobble because the IMS bearing center line the the shaft center line were not the same. This was mostly in the early 986 engines and was enoght of a problem that engine rebuilders had problems finding enough usable shafts to reassemble the engines, but that had nothing to do with the engine cases, it was a shaft assembly problem.
I may have gotten those issues mixed up, then. Thanks for the clarification. In that case, I see no justification for the advice that mechanic gave pianoporsche.
__________________
2002 Boxster Base - Arctic Silver - Tiptronic
2010 Subaru Forester
1980 Ford C-8000 Custom Cab Emergency-One Fire Truck
__________________
"I never lose. I either win or I learn." -Nelson Mandela
piper6909 is online now   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page