01-02-2018, 09:54 PM
|
#1
|
|
Certified Boxster Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
|
I never even look at the electronic oil gauge. The dipstick will never lie.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 10:06 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Visalia, Ca
Posts: 136
|
Oil change question
Quote:
Originally Posted by thstone
I never even look at the electronic oil gauge. The dipstick will never lie.
|
While it's true that the gauge can be misleading, the dipstick is even more so. If the engine is cold, what you read at the stick, is a good measure. If it's hot, it's no more accurate than making a guess. Also, the stick does not measure what is or is not in the oil filter. Yes, the stick is a safer bet but, it's still a bet.
__________________
2001 Boxster S, Metallic Black, 6 Speed Manual, 3.2 liter engine.
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 10:37 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: California Central Coast
Posts: 1,476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertKing
While it's true that the gauge can be misleading, the dipstick is even more so. If the engine is cold, what you read at the stick, is a good measure. If it's hot, it's no more accurate than making a guess. Also, the stick does not measure what is or is not in the oil filter. Yes, the stick is a safer bet but, it's still a bet.
|
How can a physical device taking an actual depth measurement of oil be misleading?
When the engine is cold and all oil has drained to the pan, is the ACTUAL measure. When hot, the measure on the dipstick is the operating level as the cylinder heads contain oil.
The oil filter is always 100% full so that is irrelevant after the first start after an oil change with a new filter.
The oil dipstick is a bet????
Last edited by 911monty; 01-02-2018 at 10:51 PM.
|
|
|
01-02-2018, 11:36 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Visalia, Ca
Posts: 136
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 911monty
How can a physical device taking an actual depth measurement of oil be misleading?
When the engine is cold and all oil has drained to the pan, is the ACTUAL measure. When hot, the measure on the dipstick is the operating level as the cylinder heads contain oil.
The oil filter is always 100% full so that is irrelevant after the first start after an oil change with a new filter.
The oil dipstick is a bet????
|
Yes, it's always a bet. Fluid dynamics come into play here. While the flow may be constant, the level within the filter is not. The best you can hope for is a close approximation of the current level. In plain language, a guess.
__________________
2001 Boxster S, Metallic Black, 6 Speed Manual, 3.2 liter engine.
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 08:56 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: California Central Coast
Posts: 1,476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by RobertKing
Yes, it's always a bet. Fluid dynamics come into play here. While the flow may be constant, the level within the filter is not. The best you can hope for is a close approximation of the current level. In plain language, a guess.
|
I see the problem here.......If your fluid is dynamic, then shut the engine off to check the oil.
Flow is not constant, changes with RPM.
Plain English, Guess again.
Last edited by 911monty; 01-03-2018 at 09:00 AM.
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 09:08 AM
|
#6
|
|
Motorist & Coffee Drinker
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,947
|
I don't have any special knowledge here, but when the engineers start arguing theory with the software designers, the pilots stop listening and just look it up in the book.
No noted difference in capacity between the 2.7L and 3.2L: 8.7 quarts/8.25 liters with filter change. (pg 242 in the '03 manual).
I vote that everybody who posted in this thread be banned from Facebook groups.
__________________
I am not an attorney, mechanic, or member of the clergy. Following any advice given in my posts is done at your own peril.
|
|
|
01-03-2018, 10:48 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: California Central Coast
Posts: 1,476
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 78F350
I don't have any special knowledge here, but when the engineers start arguing theory with the software designers, the pilots stop listening and just look it up in the book.
I vote that everybody who posted in this thread be banned from Facebook groups.

|
Dammit man!!! Preemptively banned from facebook !!!! How will I ever learn skills such as taking selfies needed to effectively post screenshots of pertinent data????
Not sure if Thanks are in order or not????
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:45 PM.
| |