718 sales poor - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

Pominoz · 03-26-2017, 03:57 PM

It's early days I guess, but this is not looking too good for the 718.

Porsche Boxster US car sales figures

As an aside, someone I know was actually offered the full price he paid for his 981, to trade in for a new 718 S. He said no.

Giller · 03-26-2017, 05:06 PM

I'm not sure 2 months is much of a sample size. And January - newest model outsold the previous 2 years....it's only Feb that the sales were off. Maybe in many areas, too much snow? Lots of cold?

Giller · 03-26-2017, 05:09 PM

https://newsroom.porsche.com/en/company/porsche-deliveries-2016-sales-record-13310.html

Porsche is loving the sales results of the 718!

Cbonilla · 03-26-2017, 05:29 PM

My concern with the 718 is not the car itself or its flat 4 engine. It is that the boxster now has a 4 clylinder engine while the 911 has a 6. Yes I know that the boxster s I bought in 2003 was a 3.2 liter engine when 911s came with larger 3.6s. But it was still fundamentally the same engine (and suffered from the same shortcomings). So for a substantial saving over the 911 you could buy a very similar product. Now they are fundamentally different, and I fear the boxster may be stigmatized. A Poorsche, if you will.

In what month did the 718 boxster go on sale? Are significant numbers of those early months' sales of prior year models? I have to assume that at least some are

algiorda · 03-26-2017, 06:36 PM

I'd take a 718 in a heartbeat. I could care less if it's a 4cyl. I just wouldn't take the depreciation hit. I'll never buy new again.

Perfectlap · 03-30-2017, 07:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by algiorda

I'd take a 718 in a heartbeat. I could care less if it's a 4cyl. I just wouldn't take the depreciation hit. I'll never buy new again.

you could care less that the 718 is missing one of the things you love most about your car? The "guttaral yowl" of the flat six climbing from 3k to 6k RPM?

I haven't driven the VW'esque turbo 4's but by all reviews I read the heart of the engine is no more. Sounds like driving an electric car. Sure it's zippy but you might as well be driving a souped up bumper car at the carnival.

algiorda · 03-30-2017, 07:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Perfectlap

you could care less that the 718 is missing one of the things you love most about your car? The "guttaral yowl" of the flat six climbing from 3k to 6k RPM?

I haven't driven the VW'esque turbo 4's but by all reviews I read the heart of the engine is no more. Sounds like driving an electric car. Sure it's zippy but you might as well be driving a souped up bumper car at the carnival.

Have you looked at the performance specs of the 718? (2017 Porsche 718 Boxster S Sport Chrono PDK: 11.9 1/4 Mile time - Fastest Boxster Ever) I could care less about the growl and more about the finish line. Besides, I think Porsche has done a wonderful job tuning the 718 4cyl exhaust. I will admit the lower end Turbo torque will be some getting used to.

Perfectlap · 03-30-2017, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by algiorda

Have you looked at the performance specs of the 718? (2017 Porsche 718 Boxster S Sport Chrono PDK: 11.9 1/4 Mile time - Fastest Boxster Ever) I could care less about the growl and more about the finish line. Besides, I think Porsche has done a wonderful job tuning the 718 4cyl exhaust. I will admit the lower end Turbo torque will be some getting used to.

yes cars get faster with time. But they don't become more driver oriented because in order to capture that extra tenth of a second on each corner the car must take the driver out of more of the equation. And having been in a wide variety cars I can tell you the more involved over a lap the driver is the more exciting 9 in 10 drivers will be.
Part of that experience is the car letting you know its right there with you audibly and through feedback. Yet the newer the Porsche the more that is blunted.

Give me the Boxster Spyder with the 911S flat 6 engine even if the flat four T is faster over a lap. I doubt you would be able to tell which of the two was the faster lap if you drove both cars until you crossed the finished.
Your getting the flat 4 not because its faster, but because its cheaper to build and less likely to break down in-warranty. Making these levels of power reliably with flat 6 requires a lot more egineer noggin.

Giller · 03-26-2017, 06:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cbonilla

My concern with the 718 is not the car itself or its flat 4 engine. It is that the boxster now has a 4 clylinder engine while the 911 has a 6. Yes I know that the boxster s I bought in 2003 was a 3.2 liter engine when 911s came with larger 3.6s. But it was still fundamentally the same engine (and suffered from the same shortcomings). So for a substantial saving over the 911 you could buy a very similar product. Now they are fundamentally different, and I fear the boxster may be stigmatized. A Poorsche, if you will.

In what month did the 718 boxster go on sale? Are significant numbers of those early months' sales of prior year models? I have to assume that at least some are

Stigmatized? A fully kitted out Boxster is still going to cost over $100K....that's not a poor man's car. And while yes, you can certainly get one cheaper if you drop some of the bells and whistles, it still ain't cheap. And remember - the Cayman, possibly Porsche's best sports car, is even cheaper than the Boxster.

Pdwight · 03-26-2017, 08:01 PM

You can buy a new Corvette for a lot less money, for around the same money a superior car (IMHO) a GTR.....Boxsters should hit the market for about the same US dollars as a corvette .

Porsche9 · 03-26-2017, 09:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pdwight

You can buy a new Corvette for a lot less money, for around the same money a superior car (IMHO) a GTR.....Boxsters should hit the market for about the same US dollars as a corvette .

While I like both the C7 and the Boxster/Caymen I would not cross shop the two. The GTR is also very different and at a base price of about $110k s more expensive than a Boxster.

mikefocke · 03-27-2017, 01:01 PM

I wouldn't drive an older 'vette if you gave it to me. Sampled several before I re-entered the Porsche world. Was actually negative about Porsche then based on my 914 experience and the lack of dealer service I had experienced (granted 1970-1972).

Vette: Huge ponderous feel. Too much power. Build quality and interior materials sub-par.

Boxster: I just fit and it felt right. I never felt any lack of HP.

But to prices. Why should we expect the current Boxster to be priced anything near what the older ones were? Nothing else is. Yes it is a shock to go to the configurator and see the $90k+ most would order. (Mine is $100k+.) But if you order a car with features similar to what came on a 2004 Boxster, the increase isn't that much beyond inflation. I think it is just we want more in our cars like navigation, fancy adjustable suspensions, electronic nannies, etc that our older cars didn't have.

Porsche9 · 03-27-2017, 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikefocke

I wouldn't drive an older 'vette if you gave it to me. Sampled several before I re-entered the Porsche world. Was actually negative about Porsche then based on my 914 experience and the lack of dealer service I had experienced (granted 1970-1972).

Vette: Huge ponderous feel. Too much power. Build quality and interior materials sub-par.

Boxster: I just fit and it felt right. I never felt any lack of HP.

But to prices. Why should we expect the current Boxster to be priced anything near what the older ones were? Nothing else is. Yes it is a shock to go to the configurator and see the $90k+ most would order. (Mine is $100k+.) But if you order a car with features similar to what came on a 2004 Boxster, the increase isn't that much beyond inflation. I think it is just we want more in our cars like navigation, fancy adjustable suspensions, electronic nannies, etc that our older cars didn't have.

It's a sports car and treat it as such when buying one new and you can avoid going above the base price by much. But you are right everyone wants all the extra which I argue add little to the overall expereince. The resale market seems to support that by generally giving little for all the extras.

clickman · 03-29-2017, 07:18 AM

Don't have all the extras. Don't miss 'em. Top down and flat six howl are all I need

Dragonwind · 03-29-2017, 01:17 AM

I'm hoping to have an opportunity to try a 718 this spring. I'm still a little hung up about losing the 6 cal though.

BIGJake111 · 03-29-2017, 05:21 AM

Two comments here

1. With sales figures they can be misleading if you don't add cayman and boxster sales, oddly enough it seems there is a similar sized market for pre 2005 just boxsters as there is for post 2005 boxsters and cayman, it's like the cayman didn't really bring in many more customers just cannibalizes current sales a little, (although it did add a valuable option to the lineup).

2. At this point, adjusted for inflation a lot of our old boxster Ses have window stickers well above a modern boxsters ***with similar options** of course a new car with carbon ceramics is on up there but a car with a performance option or two, full leather, a few exclusive options. That'll come together from 1999 dollars when the S first went on sale to be usually more than a modern boxster S (or I guess due to the new marketing strategy of boxster above cayman, at least above the cayman S)

Chuck W. · 03-31-2017, 11:35 PM

My wife just bought a BMW M2; $49,000 plus tax and license for a European Delivery. Six cylinder, 6 speed MT and artificial sound piped in. The sound piped in is no big deal. I have listened for it and can't tell it over the exhaust note. IMHO, it is a great price for what she got. Apples to oranges from a Cayman or Boxster but I believe for the price she got a better deal.