Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-21-2016, 07:02 AM   #1
Motorist & Coffee Drinker
 
78F350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,940
Garage
This car http://986forum.com/forums/boxsters-sale-wanted/57612-1999-boxster-128k-hardtop-lots-parts-atlanta-2.html had a slow leak when I got it.

It was not a significant concern for driving it, but clearly something was not right and it slowly got worse over time. After about 6 months of driving I took it to the shop. Turned out to be the seal for the IMS. The RMS and IMS bearing were fine.
__________________
I am not an attorney, mechanic, or member of the clergy. Following any advice given in my posts is done at your own peril.
78F350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2016, 07:18 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: S.California
Posts: 2,029
"Turned out to be the seal for the IMS. The RMS and IMS bearing were fine."

Thanks for mentioning this because the conventional wisdom would have been to predict that the RMS was leaking. It is often mentioned as a 'while you are in there' PM item with clutch & IMSB.
You may have saved some people a lot of work because replacing the RMS is quite tedious !
Gelbster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2016, 09:02 AM   #3
Motorist & Coffee Drinker
 
78F350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 3,940
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gelbster View Post
"Turned out to be the seal for the IMS. The RMS and IMS bearing were fine."

Thanks for mentioning this because the conventional wisdom would have been to predict that the RMS was leaking. It is often mentioned as a 'while you are in there' PM item with clutch & IMSB.
You may have saved some people a lot of work because replacing the RMS is quite tedious !
The funny thing is that before they pulled the transmission to get a look, we all thought it was the RMS. The shop had told me not to worry about replacing the dual row IMS bearing. I ended up having them install a LN dual row ceramic bearing, 'while they were in there'.
__________________
I am not an attorney, mechanic, or member of the clergy. Following any advice given in my posts is done at your own peril.
78F350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page