05-10-2016, 07:57 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 308
|
I'm reminded of the pathetic cowards who criticize our troops to cover their fear of fighting in the military. If you aren't confident enough to carry and want a nanny state to defend you and your family, fine. Just keep your mouth ( or fingers in this case) shut. No one asked your opinion here.
|
|
|
05-10-2016, 08:10 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 2,079
|
Bravo Chris
FWIW My son is a cop, my best friend is a cop as are many of my close friends...they will tell you they cannot defend you in the case of violent crime....they can only fill out the paperwork and follow up on leads.
|
|
|
05-10-2016, 09:05 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 487
|
I wish everyone would carry. It would save me the trouble. Kind of like herd immunity. Sorry Giller, but if enough people just fork over the wallet and avert their eyes, then the criminal act is reinforced as a successful alternative to gainful employment, and we are all less safe from the bad guys who often lack impulse control and have never experienced gun control.
BTW, I live in a reasonably safe area, yet it has been all of 10 days since I was 1st on scene of a carjacking 150 ft from my house. I was unarmed. The victim had a permit but was also unarmed at the time. She got back her wrecked car, broken phone, her credit, and most of the contents of her purse. A suspect is in custody. But she she can't get back the three plus days of lost time, and she won't feel safe walking to her car for a long time. I bet she shoots the next mofo who tries (I will thank her for the public service if she does).
Cultural bias / background: raised in the South, prep school to graduate education, professional, 2 siblings in law enforcement, one in-law career military, nephew a bounty hunter. Very pro-gun, in spite of the fact that some of the jokers with guns scare the S out of me; that is part of the price of freedom.
For a more factual perspective, look at the controlled study that is Kennessaw GA, and the impact on crime of requiring gun ownership.
And Dwight, try a fixed mount inside the pocket on the back of the passenger seat.
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 04:51 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Listowel, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,120
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokenLinkage
I wish everyone would carry. It would save me the trouble. Kind of like herd immunity. Sorry Giller, but if enough people just fork over the wallet and avert their eyes, then the criminal act is reinforced as a successful alternative to gainful employment, and we are all less safe from the bad guys who often lack impulse control and have never experienced gun control.
BTW, I live in a reasonably safe area, yet it has been all of 10 days since I was 1st on scene of a carjacking 150 ft from my house. I was unarmed. The victim had a permit but was also unarmed at the time. She got back her wrecked car, broken phone, her credit, and most of the contents of her purse. A suspect is in custody. But she she can't get back the three plus days of lost time, and she won't feel safe walking to her car for a long time. I bet she shoots the next mofo who tries (I will thank her for the public service if she does).
Cultural bias / background: raised in the South, prep school to graduate education, professional, 2 siblings in law enforcement, one in-law career military, nephew a bounty hunter. Very pro-gun, in spite of the fact that some of the jokers with guns scare the S out of me; that is part of the price of freedom.
For a more factual perspective, look at the controlled study that is Kennessaw GA, and the impact on crime of requiring gun ownership.
And Dwight, try a fixed mount inside the pocket on the back of the passenger seat.
|
But there is zero correlation between states where you can carry and those you can't with regard the crime rates, therefore there is zero proof that carrying actually reduces any crime.
Again, I'm fine if you want to carry cause it makes you feel better or it's your right, but you just can't argue it reduces crime. The facts do not support it.
__________________
2011 Boxster 987.2 Arctic silver / Black leather, PDK with Sports Chrono Package Plus
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 07:18 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 308
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giller
But there is zero correlation between states where you can carry and those you can't with regard the crime rates, therefore there is zero proof that carrying actually reduces any crime.
Again, I'm fine if you want to carry cause it makes you feel better or it's your right, but you just can't argue it reduces crime. The facts do not support it.
|
The facts certainly do support it Hillary. You're just to stupid to understand the big words.
Look, you're a miserable little coward who is terrified of having to defend yourself or any family you may or may not have. Fine. We get it. Just stop criticizing the responsible people who will defend you when the time comes.
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 07:32 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2013
Location: North Alabama
Posts: 2,079
|
Fwiw
I think the problem and where the most friction comes from is choice. If you do not want to legally carry that is your choice, that being said you have no right to tell someone else that they should not be armed and calling names does no good at all......in fact it is like cheating to win the Special Olympics
But on to more interesting dialog in this flaming thread;
What do you prefer ?
I am a 1911 man but have a Sig P230 in my Boxster
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 07:53 PM
|
#7
|
|
I am my own mechanic....
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3,432
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pdwight
I think the problem and where the most friction comes from is choice. If you do not want to legally carry that is your choice, that being said you have no right to tell someone else that they should not be armed and calling names does no good at all......in fact it is like cheating to win the Special Olympics
But on to more interesting dialog in this flaming thread;
What do you prefer ?
I am a 1911 man but have a Sig P230 in my Boxster
|
Para Ordinance limited Hy Cap .45
Star PD sub compact .45
Beretta 92FS 9mm
Sterling 9mm SMG
__________________
'04 Boxster S 50 Jahre 550 Spyder Anniversary Special Edition, 851 of 1953, 6-sp, IMS/RMS, GT Metallic silver, cocoa brown leather SOLD to member Broken Linkage.
'08 VW Touareg T-3 wife's car
'13 F150 Super Crew long bed 4x4 w/ Ego Boost
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 07:59 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 308
|
But on to more interesting dialog in this flaming thread;
What do you prefer ?
I am a 1911 man but have a Sig P230 in my Boxster[/QUOTE]
I've had a few 1911's. Loved my Gold cup. I've since moved on to Sig. I have three variations of the P220 and am looking at another one. Or two.
|
|
|
05-12-2016, 06:19 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Listowel, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,120
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRISP357
The facts certainly do support it Hillary. You're just to stupid to understand the big words.
Look, you're a miserable little coward who is terrified of having to defend yourself or any family you may or may not have. Fine. We get it. Just stop criticizing the responsible people who will defend you when the time comes.
|
You keep using the word "facts" but you never show any. Huh.
And show me where I've critisized anyone here but you, moron? I have no prob with you Americans wanting to carry guns....as a right. Said that many times. My argument is simply that it doesn't make you any safer, based on tangible evidence.
__________________
2011 Boxster 987.2 Arctic silver / Black leather, PDK with Sports Chrono Package Plus
|
|
|
05-12-2016, 09:45 AM
|
#10
|
|
Beginner
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,659
|
I'd say the Houston resident was safer with the armed robber dead in his driveway than he was when being threatened with a weapon. It's kind of hard to argue the opposite of that.
__________________
2003 S manual
|
|
|
05-12-2016, 01:34 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Peterborough Ontario Canada
Posts: 148
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRISP357
The facts certainly do support it Hillary. You're just to stupid to understand the big words.
Look, you're a miserable little coward who is terrified of having to defend yourself or any family you may or may not have. Fine. We get it. Just stop criticizing the responsible people who will defend you when the time comes.
|
Wow! You are an angry man! I hope you aren't packing! Giller is not a miserable little coward, and judging from his posts- he isn't stupid either. He and I live in a society where self defense is rarely a concern. We don't need to carry concealed weapons or go to sleep with baseball bats under our pillows. One of the main reasons that we don't is because most people aren't armed, up here in Canada. There is no possible way that being allowed to carry a gun makes the general population safer. Although, I can certainly understand why you would feel the need to carry when everyone else is.
BTW. When you call someone stupid it is best to use the correct "to" in your sentence. Otherwise it makes you look a little stupid.
__________________
1999 Boxster, Ocean Blue Metallic-grey top.
LN IMS dual row-, Ben's short shift kit
|
|
|
05-14-2016, 05:07 AM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 308
|
[QUOTE=pilut2;495786]Wow! You are an angry man! I hope you aren't packing! Giller is not a miserable little coward, and judging from his posts- he isn't stupid either. He and I live in a society where self defense is rarely a concern. We don't need to carry concealed weapons or go to sleep with baseball bats under our pillows. One of the main reasons that we don't is because most people aren't armed, up here in Canada. There is no possible way that being allowed to carry a gun makes the general population safer. Although, I can certainly understand why you would feel the need to carry when everyone else is.
BTW. When you call someone stupid it is best to use the correct "to" in your sentence. Otherwise it makes you look a little stupid.[/QUOTE
I typed in "to" rather than "too". Wonderful catch Sir. You win! Your opinion shall now be mine!
Last edited by CHRISP357; 05-14-2016 at 06:10 AM.
Reason: Changed my mind.
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 04:54 AM
|
#13
|
|
Yeast Rancher
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Englewood, FL
Posts: 95
|
We have COPS meetings in my neighborhood, where a police representative comes and gives talks on safety. His take on carry is to do it, if you feel comfortable. The police would rather show up with a dead perpetrator than a dead victim.
Also the Supreme Court says the police do not have a responsibility to protect you. It is the RESPONSIBILITY of the INDIVIDUAL to protect themselves. I know certain groups don't like those words.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/06/28/politics/justices-rule-police-do-not-have-a-constitutional-duty-to-protect-someone.html?_r=0
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pdwight
FWIW My son is a cop, my best friend is a cop as are many of my close friends...they will tell you they cannot defend you in the case of violent crime....they can only fill out the paperwork and follow up on leads.
|
__________________
2001 Boxster S
2010 Nissan Xterra S
Always get the S
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 04:49 AM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Listowel, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,120
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRISP357
I'm reminded of the pathetic cowards who criticize our troops to cover their fear of fighting in the military. If you aren't confident enough to carry and want a nanny state to defend you and your family, fine. Just keep your mouth ( or fingers in this case) shut. No one asked your opinion here.
|
You keep spouting off your 'opinion' but won't follow your own advice. Nor have you backed up any of your silly statements with facts. And coward? You're the one so scared he has to carry a gun to protect himself. Me, I walk around unarmed all day with confidence....and no one has attacked me yet!!! Shocking!
You're hilarious.
__________________
2011 Boxster 987.2 Arctic silver / Black leather, PDK with Sports Chrono Package Plus
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 05:59 PM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Kuna, Idaho
Posts: 308
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Giller
You keep spouting off your 'opinion' but won't follow your own advice. Nor have you backed up any of your silly statements with facts. And coward? You're the one so scared he has to carry a gun to protect himself. Me, I walk around unarmed all day with confidence....and no one has attacked me yet!!! Shocking!
You're hilarious.
|
My opinion? This was started as a pro gun thread, dumb ass.
Go away. Your opinion is not wanted and was not asked for here.
I'm glad you've never been attacked. I have no doubt how that would play out.
|
|
|
05-11-2016, 06:30 PM
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Listowel, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,120
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHRISP357
My opinion? This was started as a pro gun thread, dumb ass.
Go away. Your opinion is not wanted and was not asked for here.
I'm glad you've never been attacked. I have no doubt how that would play out.
|
Neither was yours....and since you've never backed anything you've said up with ANY facts - that makes you the dumb ass.
Apparently trying to have an intelligent conversation is over your head.
You sir, are pathetic...yet still hilarious.
Common, say some more dumb things and make me laugh!
__________________
2011 Boxster 987.2 Arctic silver / Black leather, PDK with Sports Chrono Package Plus
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:07 AM.
| |