Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-04-2015, 02:46 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Scotland
Posts: 21
K&N filter

If i place my excising standard air filter element with a K&N filter element, will this effect my MAS sensor in any way, if not will the K&N filter better my performance on my Porsche Boxster 986.

Any experience would be grateful appreciated.

ssmart is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 05:03 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Luv2Box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Pacific Grove, CA
Posts: 494
Garage
If you use the "search" feature, for this topic, you will find out more fact, fiction, lies and opinions than you will ever want to know.
Luv2Box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 08:39 AM   #3
Registered User
 
jsceash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,466
Garage
If your sensible and blow out the excess oil before installing and are able to clean it regularly you should be OK. I ran two different style with out any issues for 20+K. In the end I'm back using a stock filter because replacing them is easier than cleaning the K&N every couple thousand miles.

Threads read about a 50/50 split of those how contribute a problem to running one and those how have had reasonable luck running one. The other thing you'll find is allot of negative comments from people who have never used one??
__________________
2003 Black 986. modified for Advanced level HPDE and open track days.
* 3.6L LN block, 06 heads, Carrillo H rods, IDP with 987 intake, Oil mods, LN IMS. * Spec II Clutch, 3.2L S Spec P-P FW. * D2 shocks, GT3 arms & and links, Spacers front and rear * Weight reduced, No carpet, AC deleted, Remote PS pump, PS pump deleted. Recaro Pole position seats, Brey crouse ext. 5 point harness, NHP sport exhaust
jsceash is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 08:42 AM   #4
Registered User
 
EJ-Fresno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 520
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsceash View Post
If your sensible and blow out the excess oil before installing and are able to clean it regularly you should be OK. I ran two different style with out any issues for 20+K. In the end I'm back using a stock filter because replacing them is easier than cleaning the K&N every couple thousand miles.

Threads read about a 50/50 split of those how contribute a problem to running one and those how have had reasonable luck running one. The other thing you'll find is allot of negative comments from people who have never used one??
K&N filters have to be cleaned every 2000 miles?
I thought cleaning them at every oil change is good enough, am I wrong?
__________________
2003 2.7 Boxster - Tiptronic - Carrera wheels - OBC - Red calipers - Cat pipes - Modified muffler - Rear speakers - K&N - Litronics
2006 V6 Mustang
2008 ML 350
EJ-Fresno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 09:42 AM   #5
Track rat
 
Topless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by EJ-Fresno View Post
K&N filters have to be cleaned every 2000 miles?
I thought cleaning them at every oil change is good enough, am I wrong?
How much dust and dirt do you drive through? More dust = clean more often.

I used K&N in offroad motorsport for 20 years and liked them in that application. I just don't see much upside with these cars yet there are a lot of downsides. I prefer a stock filter for 986/987 cars.
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
Topless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 01:50 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Joe B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Jackson Hole, Wyoming
Posts: 800
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssmart View Post
If i place my excising standard air filter element
You don't have to cut it out ("excise") .

K&N filters flow more air, so they don't filter as well as stock air filters, unless you oil them up too much, which then allows oil to be sucked into the engine. Stock filters are cheap. I'd stick with them.
Joe B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 02:20 PM   #7
Registered User
 
lkchris's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Albuquerque, NM, USA
Posts: 730
There was a test of BMW K motorcycles measuring airflow past filter. Compared were

Stock filter
Stock filter 1/2 blocked off
No filter
K&N

There was no measured significant difference in airflow.

Waste of money, and if you need one that's rectangular as opposed to circular, a poor quality product.
__________________
Kent Christensen
Albuquerque
2001 Boxster
2007 GL320 CDI, 2010 CL550
2 BMW motorcycles
lkchris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 02:41 PM   #8
I am my own mechanic....
 
Timco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3,433
You're better off fitting a 987 filter box and filter. That's what the SE came with. Took me a couple filter swaps before some parts guy said its a 987 filter.
__________________
'04 Boxster S 50 Jahre 550 Spyder Anniversary Special Edition, 851 of 1953, 6-sp, IMS/RMS, GT Metallic silver, cocoa brown leather SOLD to member Broken Linkage.
'08 VW Touareg T-3 wife's car
'13 F150 Super Crew long bed 4x4 w/ Ego Boost
Timco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-04-2015, 07:15 PM   #9
Registered User
 
EJ-Fresno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Posts: 520
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Timco View Post
You're better off fitting a 987 filter box and filter. That's what the SE came with. Took me a couple filter swaps before some parts guy said its a 987 filter.
Yes, I have been looking into it but this seems too complicated for me
__________________
2003 2.7 Boxster - Tiptronic - Carrera wheels - OBC - Red calipers - Cat pipes - Modified muffler - Rear speakers - K&N - Litronics
2006 V6 Mustang
2008 ML 350
EJ-Fresno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 08:35 AM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: DE
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally Posted by lkchris View Post
There was a test of BMW K motorcycles measuring airflow past filter. Compared were

Stock filter
Stock filter 1/2 blocked off
No filter
K&N

There was no measured significant difference in airflow.
.
How valid a test is this if it finds no difference in flow between a half blocked stock filter and no filter at all?
spendy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 09:07 AM   #11
I am my own mechanic....
 
Timco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by spendy View Post
How valid a test is this if it finds no difference in flow between a half blocked stock filter and no filter at all?
Performance based on available air?

Obviously airflow is blocked but the engine will only take in what it can unless blown. Test shows the car is "over-filtered", or it takes a severely blocked filter to actually take performance away. And more air flow doesn't always mean squat.
__________________
'04 Boxster S 50 Jahre 550 Spyder Anniversary Special Edition, 851 of 1953, 6-sp, IMS/RMS, GT Metallic silver, cocoa brown leather SOLD to member Broken Linkage.
'08 VW Touareg T-3 wife's car
'13 F150 Super Crew long bed 4x4 w/ Ego Boost
Timco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 09:36 AM   #12
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe B View Post
K&N filters flow more air, so they don't filter as well as stock air filters, ...
That is exactly what this test showed: Debunking the K&N Myth - Why OEM is Better
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-05-2015, 12:07 PM   #13
Registered User
 
Luv2Box's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Pacific Grove, CA
Posts: 494
Garage
Told ya!
Luv2Box is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2015, 02:38 AM   #14
Registered User
 
DrCactus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 452
Garage
I replaced mine this past Spring and never had an issue. Car sounds smoother if anything as the old paper one was clogged up really bad... no issues with MAS sensor.
__________________
DrCactus
DrCactus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2015, 04:11 AM   #15
Registered User
 
kk2002s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: S. New Jersey
Posts: 1,239
Garage
Car came with one. I thought that was a good indication the PO thought about his/her car to think about doing something other than just drive it.
I used it no problems for 1-1/2 years. I had put one in my mustang and drove it 80k miles with no issues
Before a 2500+ mile road trip last year, I thought I didn't want the added variable of an over oiled Filter potentially clogging my MAF so I put in paper.
I'm getting ready for another 2000 mile road trip and I'm going to put in another new paper

Only issue with paper filter, I can't find any in-stock in auto parts stores around me so it's another basic maintenance item I have to order on-line
__________________
2002 S - old school third pedal
Seal Grey
kk2002s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2015, 11:46 AM   #16
Registered User
 
Fintro11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Nanaimo, Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
Posts: 900
How are the fab speed ones?

Fintro11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page