Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-21-2006, 05:25 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ohio
Posts: 26
I'm not sure how Subaru supports their cranks in their boxer engines, but they certainly have their share of problems with their design, including head gasket issues that allow oil into the cooling system (or worse). Subaru's answer is stop-leak. I have a problem putting stop leak in a vehicle that only has 41k miles on it.
http://www.subaruproblems.com/
Many of their engines also suffer from piston slap when cold, sounding like a thrashing machine, which they consider "normal."
So I'm not sure I'd go there for any solutions.

I had a '99 Miata that was in the build dates that had the dreaded crank end play/bearing problem, and though my engine was not effected, I had to prove that it wasn't when I sold it.

I also own an '00 Acura TL that had to have an extra oiler added to the automatic trans to ensure proper lubrication. Acura has extended the warranty on these vehicles to 8 years or 100k. It is my understanding that they are even repairing trannies out of warranty, but who knows how long they'll do that.

I recently needed two new rear wheel bearings in my Subaru (a known design problem), when I told my dealer that I wanted to talk to the Subaru rep, they declined since my car is not under warranty due to age (6 months past). When I told them I wasn't going to pay the $800, they filed theft of services charges against me, which was later dropped after they knocked 200 off the bill. Needless to say, I won't be doing business with them again (or with Subaru).

It seems design issues are running rapant these days. There are MANY "secret" recalls on vehicles. It doesn't surprise me when there are issues with mass market vehicles, but I expect something better from the premium manufacturers. Something is disjointed when highest profitability = unresolved quality/design issues. Is that part of the Porsche "mystique?"
mquillen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 06:27 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 141
Here is a not so simple question....

How much do you guys think it would cost for porsche to re-design their boxster engine?

Of course there are no guarantees the re-design would fix the problem or not cause another one, but lets assume a re-design fixes the RMS.. I can't imagine it would cost that much money or time?

Mike
99-Boxster-MK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2006, 07:14 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Sorry, as a consumer, I see no legitimate reason for this RMS issue to continue.

As for a redesign costing a lot, why is this my issue?

Porsche redesigned the engine in 1998 in the 911. They booted it, they should fix it!

The car costs $70 plus, would it be too much to ask that the drive train be bullet proof?

I will end my tirade with one word.

Lexus!

PS- My wife has had Subarus since 1994. Not one visit to the dealer for a snafu.
Only routine maint.
__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-22-2006, 07:59 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: ohio
Posts: 26
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee

PS- My wife has had Subarus since 1994. Not one visit to the dealer for a snafu.
Only routine maint.
Not to hijack this thread, but my wife had a 96 Subaru that was also a great car. I don't think Subaru is the car company it was 10 years ago--recommending stop leak for new engines???? I think some people buy a new car so they won't need stop leak.

I wish Lexus made a car like the Boxter. I don't consider the SC an alternative, though it's a nice car in its own right, and actually a much better value than a new Boxter. I'm sure that some that just want top down touring do consider it a direct competitor.
mquillen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2006, 07:07 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Dallas
Posts: 11
To S or not to S.

Does anyone know if the RMS issue is more prevalent on S or non S models?
rbhlaf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2006, 07:23 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
Quote:
Originally Posted by rbhlaf
Does anyone know if the RMS issue is more prevalent on S or non S models?
Hi,

Same Block M96, so issue is same-same...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99
MNBoxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-23-2006, 02:38 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 4
I've also heard of RMS leaks on 996's. A friend of mine with a 996GT3 has had his RMS replaced twice, and it has less than 10K miles on it.

I simply don't understand why Porsche cannot make a car that doesn't leak oil. I understand that they're performance cars, and I *might* understand a little oil leak if the car was driven hard, but frankly most Porsches never see the track. This RMS issue is going to follow the Boxster forever, much like the engine issues on the early 964's.
Davikk is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page