07-07-2011, 03:43 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue2000s
I saw that, now there will be two useless gears 
|
I blame the auto industry's obsession with fuel economy. But you're right 5-speed is more than enough gears because more gears = more mechanical parts = more likely to break.
They're moving to electric power steering as well. Perhaps this should be a new thread.
|
|
|
07-07-2011, 05:58 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,152
|
i don't get the 7-speed thing either, but am hoping that the electric power steering will be adaptable to earlier cars (at a reasonable price).
|
|
|
07-07-2011, 07:03 AM
|
#3
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Porsche is 1/2 step away from providing one sequential shifting transmission in all it's cars. The clutch pedal can always be there but it can be optional to use. The clutch is electronically controlled in a pdk, they can just give override control of the electronics to the clutch pedal if it's depressed. Then there's no real mechanical connection to the throttle, clutch or steering. It's basically like driving a simulator. Maybe Lotus will still make fun cars in the future.
Last edited by blue2000s; 07-07-2011 at 02:54 PM.
|
|
|
07-07-2011, 02:52 PM
|
#4
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King
i don't get the 7-speed thing either, but am hoping that the electric power steering will be adaptable to earlier cars (at a reasonable price).
|
I hope for Porsche's sake that the electric assist isn't like the systems on any other cars because as much as hydrolic PS sucks from the enjoyment of a good steering rack, the electric systems are twice as bad.
If you've ever driven a Prius, you know what I mean. Extremely disconnected. On GM cars, they think steering effort some how equals feel, which is of course not true and they suck too.
Last edited by blue2000s; 07-08-2011 at 11:30 AM.
|
|
|
07-08-2011, 03:05 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 1,561
|
While I love my 987S I can tell you from experience, when a 986 was either behind me or in front on me, on The Tail of the Dragon over the years with fellow 986Forum members & friends (Randall, Derb, Sammy, & NickCats), the performance differences were very-very minimal. Both very capable.
|
|
|
07-08-2011, 11:17 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Flavor 987S
While I love my 987S I can tell you from experience, when a 986 was either behind me or in front on me, on The Tail of the Dragon over the years with fellow 986Forum members & friends (Randall, Derb, Sammy, & NickCats), the performance differences were very-very minimal. Both very capable.
|
I'd be curious to see this with the new Boxster Spyder. From lap one 1 the manual version was faster than a PDK-equipped CaymanS on a Road&Track test circuit.
320 hp on a lighter more rigid tub may be well beyond "feels a little quicker" territory.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
07-08-2011, 11:24 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfectlap
I'd be curious to see this with the new Boxster Spyder. From lap one 1 the manual version was faster than a PDK-equipped CaymanS on a Road&Track test circuit.
320 hp on a lighter more rigid tub may be well beyond "feels a little quicker" territory.
|
Problem is not every one is the Stig so arguing about faster lap time (Or which car is faster at the ring) is pointless.
|
|
|
07-08-2011, 11:55 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 1,561
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Perfectlap
I'd be curious to see this with the new Boxster Spyder. From lap one 1 the manual version was faster than a PDK-equipped CaymanS on a Road&Track test circuit.
320 hp on a lighter more rigid tub may be well beyond "feels a little quicker" territory.
|
Well, depending on the options selected on the Spyder, they are not that much lighter than a 987.1 or a 987.2 While a Spyder would have 40 more HP that my 987.1S (280 HP) that's not that much difference either. Though, I'd love the have the extra 40 ponnies. That's why I also have my beloved 993 Turbo with +400 HP.
Like I said, when I was on the TOD over the years (2007 and 2008) there were 986 and 986S in the group, and they all hung strong against my Boxster, even though I have +40 HP on those cars.
Driver skill is the key.
|
|
|
07-08-2011, 01:58 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,152
|
it's a hp to weight thing.
a 986 puts out 250 hp and weighs 2822 lbs; that's a ratio of 8.86.
a 987 puts out 290 hp but weighs 3130 lbs; that's a ratio of 9.27.
the 987 has more hp/lb, but ...
lose 125 lbs, or gain an additional 10 hp, and the 986 is neck and neck with the 987. do both and you got the 987 beat. sure, the 987 has pasm, psm, pse, pcm, tpms, sc+ and some fancy-looking gills on the side. i think my 2000 S looks better and the only option it has is intermittent wipers. i have no stability control and will occasionally find myself spun-out in the rhubarb on track day. i have no nav and occasionally find myself wondering where the hell i am on a beautiful sunny day with the top down. my car can't tell me when my tires are flat. i don't have any buttons on my steering wheel to turn my stereo on.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:09 AM.
| |