Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-04-2011, 06:08 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by rkwei
Just heard from the lawyers that since both parties signed the settlement papers that Righthaven has formally dismissed the case against 986forum and myself in Nevada federal court.

Good news!
__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 11:20 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 19
Another contributor

I don't post much, but I do enjoy reading the posts. I sent a contribution.
randijo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 07:47 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: St Louis
Posts: 43
sent you some cash, this site has helped me out alot. I am from Ireland living in the States. This Law suit crap bothers the **************** out of me.
stephendoherty62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2011, 07:55 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 26
As soon as I pay for my repairs I will send some money.
iluvboxsters is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2011, 08:04 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 874
Very disappointing to read of such cynical behaviour, will try to remember to send a few bucks over when my invoices get paid later in the month.

One query I have regards making the site bigger and stronger, why not let non-members view forum posts / threads? Surely this would increase traffic immensely. Plenty of forums do allow non members to read most if not all the forum. What's the downside?
__________________
Manual '00 3.2 S Arctic Silver
pothole is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2011, 12:28 PM   #6
Registered User
 
tonycarreon's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Frederick, MD
Posts: 1,396
a federal judge yesterday dismissed a case RH brought against democratic underground saying that RH did not have grounds to sue since it did not actually own the content it was suing for (background - RH sues on behalf of media outlets by purchasing the right to sue, but not the actual copyright). the judge also ruled that RH failed to list the original copyright holder in most of the 200 cases it was pursuing.

the judge gave RH 2 weeks to explain why it should not be sanctioned.

and (according to the forbes blog) if RH is ordered to pay defendants attorney costs, it could lead to a wave of lawsuits by others who have "settled" rather than go to court.

the ruling essentially invalidates all of the other "contracts" RH has for "copyright" transfer with the specific right's holder (that i think was the cause of this suit) **************** and threatens the other "cases" RH has in other states with other content holders.

http://blogs.forbes.com/jeffbercovici/2011/06/15/copyright-vigilante-righthaven-will-fight-on-after-ruling/
__________________
"Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you."
tonycarreon is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page