Learning from failures provides exceptional experience.. Thats what we do and have done, even with our own test engines.
Now, the results are in... It appears that Pat dodged a big bullet!!
We detached the AOS charge hose to the intake and blocked it off, filled the engine with oil and fired it up..
It smoked like a freight train for 5 minutes and then started clearing up!! There were ZERO mechanical sounds from the engine from start up to full warm up so I feel the issue is the AOS.. I also feel the engine is mechanically sound.
Now we will install a new AOS .. I'll then drive it home tonight and put some miles on it under a watchful eye, then tomorrow we'll repeat the compression and leak down tests and compare numbers to ensure the episode didn't hurt anything else.
NOW:
What people need to learn from this is simple.. IF Pat had cranked this car back up after this extreme episode he would have been in trouble.. The #1 cylinder was half filled with oil, just a bump of the starter would have hydro-locked the engine and created a cylinder/piston/connecting rod failure in short order.. Thats because engine oil can't be compressed to figures as high as the CR of the engine, near 11:1.. Something has to give and something will break.
I think this one was just an extreme AOS failure, we know that everything else is fine..
BUT Pat has an IMS bearing thats at a very early stage 1 failure and he has to make up his mind about what to do. With the car at my facility, the wisest decision is to retrofit that puppy and be done with it.. With seal material in the sump, I feel OK test driving it and doing the rest of my work, but I'd do something very soon...
I won't be dynoing this car until the IMS bearing is addressed, the liability is too high to stress the engine that hard with seal material in the oil...
Pat, go play the lottery... You were lucky today.. BUT you paid attention to the forums and did exactly what you were supposed to do, shut the car down immediately, don't try to re-start it and get it to someone who specializes in the M96 engine.
I could be wrong and if I am the test drive will illustrate that later this evening.. Thats why I do things the way I do them.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Last edited by Jake Raby; 10-14-2010 at 10:59 AM.
|