04-25-2005, 05:47 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 11
|
Slightly used gen 1 S, or new gen 2 non-S?
That is the question. Opinion: experts??
|
|
|
04-25-2005, 06:25 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
You need to narrow your question down a tad, no?
|
|
|
04-25-2005, 07:09 PM
|
#3
|
Watch Freak
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC
Posts: 434
|
Here is a general answer to a general question. I would not consider a non-S period, ever! I feel they are both underpowered so the non-S would be a dog for my liking.
Other than that do what makes you happy.
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2006 Lamborghini Gallardo 6spd-Rosso Leto
2006 Range Rover Sport Supercharged-Winter Beater
2006 BMW 750i 19" Sport Wheels BK/BK-Daily
2005 Lotus Elise Sport & Touring Package-Fun
2001 Lexus RX300-Back-up Winter Beater
2001 Mercedes-Benz S500 Sport AMG-Sold
2000 Boxster S Heavily Modified-Sold
2000 Nissan Altima GLE-Parking Spot Holder
-------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
04-25-2005, 08:01 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by getting there
That is the question. Opinion: experts??
|
If I was torn between the two I would take myself up to the dealership, test drive both, and then decide and make a purchase. Seems like the most logical thing in my book. Just my 02
|
|
|
04-27-2005, 02:14 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 14
|
I drive a standard '03 Boxster and it is definitely not a dog. I drove the standard and S version before deciding on the standard. I did not feel the slight performance gain in the S was worth an extra 10 grand for my purposes. I sold my 350Z to get into a Boxster. Neither the standard or the S has that kick in the paints feel you get when you punch the throttle on a Z. But the Boxster is a better balanced, more fun to drive car than the Z ever was. Power isn't everything.
Adam is right. Go to dealer and drive both. Then decide for yourself. You can't go wrong with either model as far as I am concerned.
|
|
|
04-27-2005, 04:52 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
ON a used S, you can get a lot of car for relatively little money. The first two years depreciation on a new S will kill you!
|
|
|
04-27-2005, 05:09 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Even brand new 04 S's can be had in the upper 40k range. I know what I'd do.
|
|
|
04-27-2005, 06:41 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 655
|
S is the answerr
I would opt for the S rather than the regular. Has more standard options: better brakes, more horses are the main reasons. Neither are dogs and both are quick and handle super great. I would favor it more for the brakes which are the 911 brakes stops you and a dime.
__________________
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine neccesitate
|
|
|
04-28-2005, 07:04 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
If you are asking about buying a 986 S (3.2L) vs. 987 (2.7L)
I would say don't buy a 987 they have ugly headlights.
seriously, it would depend on how much you can get the 986S for.
If its not a serious mark down I would go for the newer car. I would look at
the likely depreciation of the two. My take is that you take less of a hit with a very popular used car. The pool of buyers is inevitably larger for people looking to spend 25-35K than those looking to spend 35-45K.
I got my 2000S for 30K with 10,000 miles last fall. Its my hope that it will be quiet some time before it get down to $20K. Historically I've never put more than 10K miles a year on my cars so hopefully that will help out over the next four years.
From a performance standpoint the power of the new Boxster is close to the old S model so you won't be making a huge swing either way in that department.
And I strongly feel that neither the S or the standard are underpowered.
Take both to a Porsche driving school and when you set the absolute quickets lap possible in either, then tell me you need more power. The Boxster is sportscar not a drag strip car, there is more than enough power to get you into trouble.
A friend of mine used to race junior formulas with a current f1 driver and he recently told me that this professional driver sent his father a new Mercedez compliments of the team. After driving it he STRONGLY noted that its 500+HP should not be sold to the general public. Even if you are only intending to drive in straight lines you need to master the power you have before you complain about not having enough ooomph.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Last edited by Perfectlap; 04-28-2005 at 07:14 AM.
|
|
|
04-28-2005, 07:04 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: maryland
Posts: 34
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by 03box
I drive a standard '03 Boxster and it is definitely not a dog. I drove the standard and S version before deciding on the standard. I did not feel the slight performance gain in the S was worth an extra 10 grand for my purposes. I sold my 350Z to get into a Boxster. Neither the standard or the S has that kick in the paints feel you get when you punch the throttle on a Z. But the Boxster is a better balanced, more fun to drive car than the Z ever was. Power isn't everything.
Adam is right. Go to dealer and drive both. Then decide for yourself. You can't go wrong with either model as far as I am concerned.
|
the new box s is faster and feels faster than the 350z to all speeds....i did a same day back to back test drive and the car magazines confirm my seat of the pants impressions
|
|
|
04-28-2005, 07:42 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scycle2020
the new box s is faster and feels faster than the 350z to all speeds....i did a same day back to back test drive and the car magazines confirm my seat of the pants impressions
|
The Z may feel faster than a S because it has alot of tq, but it's also a tank compared to the boxster. We all know the S is faster.
|
|
|
04-28-2005, 09:03 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 18
|
An option to consider is a new '04 S. I bought one in Feb. '05, and found that dealers were desperate to get rid of them. I paid $46k, with numerous options (18", carrera whls, bose, xenon, tiptronic, and more).
|
|
|
04-28-2005, 11:41 AM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Very nice buy^. Good job.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:46 PM.
| |