04-28-2005, 08:42 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by scycle2020
the new box s is faster and feels faster than the 350z to all speeds....i did a same day back to back test drive and the car magazines confirm my seat of the pants impressions
|
The Z may feel faster than a S because it has alot of tq, but it's also a tank compared to the boxster. We all know the S is faster.
|
|
|
04-28-2005, 10:03 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 18
|
An option to consider is a new '04 S. I bought one in Feb. '05, and found that dealers were desperate to get rid of them. I paid $46k, with numerous options (18", carrera whls, bose, xenon, tiptronic, and more).
|
|
|
04-28-2005, 12:41 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Very nice buy^. Good job.
|
|
|
04-28-2005, 01:13 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
indeed.
I just paid $4K for Litronics, Carreras(w/ Toyo racing tires). And another $3500 for an aero kit and GT3 Seats.
It adds up fast.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
04-29-2005, 09:32 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 2
|
Faced just this problem yesterday.
Hi, I'm new to this forum, but also new to boxster ownership. My buying decision came down to either a new 987 Boxster with a sticker of 49k, a new 986 Boxster with a sticker of $49k that the dealer was offering to sell for 40k (I believe I could have gotten 39k or maybe even 38k), or an '03 Boxster S with 17k miles for 40k (ended up paying 39k).
I had the opportunity to drive all 3 back to back and I ended up buying the Boxster S, nicely optioned with 18" carrera wheels, heated seats, Digital Hi-Fi Sound, Cruise, Wheel Caps with Color Crest, remote, windblocker, Porsche approved.
My driving impressions were that there is very little power difference between the new Boxster and the old Boxster S. I blieve that Onad's message was that the ratios in the 5-speed made more torque available for around town driving, and I definitely agree with that. The 6-speed in the S required more shifting and spreads the torque around; I don't plan to do any in-town driving with this car so the 6-speed made sense for me.
The '05 987 Boxster felt like it had a tighter suspension than the S, though this could have something to do with the fact that the S had some miles on it and the '05 Boxster was new. The steering on the new Boxster was more direct and seemed to be quicker, but I preferred the feel of the S. The transmission in the '05 Boxster was stiffer and more precise; it also had shorter throws.
In the end, it was a very close call for me. I did like the 6-speed for driving fun, but I believe the transmission in the new Boxter was better overall. I decided on the S because it came in about 7-8k less than the new Boxster similarly equipped (without the 6-speed in the new Boxter); and it came with a Porsche approved extended warranty to 6 years/100,000 miles total.
Definitely drive both; I was very impressed with the improvements in the new 987 Boxster.
|
|
|
04-29-2005, 10:03 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 3,033
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by rudylai
My driving impressions were that there is very little power difference between the new Boxster and the old Boxster S. I blieve that Onad's message was that the ratios in the 5-speed made more torque available for around town driving, and I definitely agree with that. The 6-speed in the S required more shifting and spreads the torque around; I don't plan to do any in-town driving with this car so the 6-speed made sense for me.
.
|
Just curious, did you give both cars a fairly good flogging or was it more of a easy cruise?
|
|
|
04-30-2005, 03:16 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Union City, CA
Posts: 2
|
I did get a chance to drive them both pretty hard. The only thing was, after we (me and the salesman) got going on the Boxster S, I noticed that the fuel light was on and I was worring that we would run out so I ended up driving it for less than 10 minutes.
The biggest advantage that the Boxster S has is that the power band is linear and it keeps building almost up to red line. The new Boxster utilizes the power that it has well and the 5-speed seems to take best advantage of the available power, but it did run out of breath as the RPMs starting pushing past 5500. The Boxster S seems to pull smoothly all the way to red line; if you don't have to deal with traffic and mostly drive on open roads, then this trait is very nice. If you drive in traffic a lot, the regular Boxster with the 5-speed might be a better choice because it's less of a chore to access the available power.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:32 AM.
| |