Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-19-2009, 02:32 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 206
Garage
I am thinking along similar lines, but does the spec line have a version for our cars that is s sprung clutch?
__________________
rob76turbo
Current Porsches: 2002 Boxster S (Speed yellow)
Past Porsches: 1972 914, 1987 944S, 1976 930, 1986 951, 1999 986, 1992 968, 2001 986 S, 2006 Cayman S, 1986 951 track car, 2001 986 S, 2005 Cayenne
rob76turbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2009, 04:03 PM   #2
2001 RUF 3800S
 
violametallic-S-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 326
Should I be looking for a single mass LWFW or a dual mass? What is the difference?
violametallic-S- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2009, 05:35 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
You won't find a lightweight dual mass. Single mass is just that: one piece of metal. A dual mass has two pieces that are held together with elastomeric material to allow some "give" to dampen driveline forces.

Spec does make a sprung clutch (they'll make pretty much whatever you want actually), and if you do go to a single mass flywheel, a sprung centered clutch is the only acceptable way to do it.
__________________
Boxster S
Cloudsurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 09:37 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,617
You are missing one very important point: The dual mass flywheel acts as a vibration dampener for the engine; the sprung clutch acts as a dampener for the drive line………..taking away the dual mass dampening can result in problems as the largest vibration dampener on the engine is now missing.
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:13 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
That is absolutely true. In my ideal world, I'd like a lightwight dual mass unit, but alas, I've never seen one produced for any application.
__________________
Boxster S
Cloudsurfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 06:28 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,617
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmwm750
That is absolutely true. In my ideal world, I'd like a lightwight dual mass unit, but alas, I've never seen one produced for any application.
Which is why I totally agree with Jake on this one, and wouldn’t run one without internally balancing the M96 first………….these engines have enough issues without increasing their internal harmonics.
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 11:27 AM   #7
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
I have recently experienced a broken crankshaft from an engine equipped with an LWFW that was dynamically balanced as an assembly with the engine totally disassembled. (I did not assemble it)

But that person has broken 4 crankshafts since last October.
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page