02-19-2009, 04:45 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
If you want cheap stocks, there are plenty that have no risk of going Chapter 11. Alcoa, Dow Chemical, Altrea, Harley Davidson to name a few.
International Paper, RR Donnelly.
I am not buying GM. I think 11 is in their future.
Ford is OK and pretty cheap.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
02-19-2009, 05:32 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,746
|
Typically Chapter 11 relegates common stockholders to go to the back of the bus when it comes to who recoups what. Dependant upon the appointed judge, typically creditors, bondholders, pension plans, employees, etc. will see monies before you would as a stockholder. I would view it as playing the lotto, except with a MUCH lower payout if you hit. GM stock IMO is a guaranteed loss.
|
|
|
02-19-2009, 05:49 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
wow you are brave. I hop you put a tight stop on that order.
In a bear market, the rule is not to go long until the stock has bounced off its lowest. A real bottom comes and goes quickly. We see no evidence of that.
If you're bargain hunting there are some tempting stocks, particularly in energy and agricluture (fertilzers) and maybe ceratin techs. But I wouldn't touch autos or banking unless it's to sell short and cover quickly. Those are falling knives with some potential big time disasters coming soon.
p.s.
I'm not buying and holding a single stock. All short term buys. I'm giving hard thought to going 50% in gold ETFs and the rest in T-bills in my retirement accounts as well. If GM goes under their will be a ripple effect through the entire S&P.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Last edited by Perfectlap; 02-19-2009 at 05:53 PM.
|
|
|
02-20-2009, 06:40 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: CA
Posts: 115
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brucelee
I am not buying GM. I think 11 is in their future.
Ford is OK and pretty cheap.
|
I agree. If - and it's a big IF - I were going to buy any US auto stock it would be Ford since I think they have the best chance for survival. They might even pick up some market share from the die-hard buy-American-or-walk contingent once the shakeout is over.
Unfortunately, I think GM and Chrysler are already dead but just don't know enough to lie down yet. Unless the UAW is willing to take big concessions, I afraid that these bailouts are just postponing the inevitable.
|
|
|
02-20-2009, 09:03 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 1,675
|
Glad you didn't risk much investment...my bet is on BK filing. I've already lost more money than I'll probably recoup in my lifetime...why throw more away?
Hopefully, someone will save Saab in the meantime.
__________________
JGM
2002 Boxster S
1973 911 Green FrankenMeanie
PCA DE Instructor circa '95
|
|
|
02-20-2009, 09:07 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
|
The only thing which will save the General and the Pentagram in the long run is a Chptr.11, disolution of the UAW and Job Bank and a restructuring of their Healthcare and Pension programs.
These two companies have annual union payrolls of about $14B. But they have combined contributions to Healthcare of about $60B, and Pension pymnts. of about $14B (or almost 5 times more than actual payroll itself). The Job Bank, setup in the past to resolve a union arbitration, provides that if any UAW employee is permanently laid off, they receive 85% of their former salary for life (with COLAs!!!), regardless if they ever find other work! The Union is NEVER going to make these concessions voluntarily. Under a restructuring, they won't have much choice.
All these costs are either passed to you each time you buy their products, or as has more been the case, stifles their R&D committments. This has been the reason, much more than alleged stodgy thinking in the Boardroom, that has allowed so many foreign car makers to sieze their market share over the years.
Last edited by Lil bastard; 02-20-2009 at 09:12 AM.
|
|
|
02-20-2009, 11:33 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 256
|
GM Craters! Stopped at 1.71, lost about hundred bucks, the only winner here is Sharebuilder.com :-) Appears that investors are worried that GM may convert a sizeable amount of debt into equity stock, not exactly sure what that means but it doesn't sound good.
__________________
'06 Cayman 'S' - Sold (Sport Chrono, PASM, TPMS, 19' CAS Wheels, NAV)
'06 Cayenne - Sold
'01 Boxster 'S' - Sold
'00 Boxster - Sold
|
|
|
02-20-2009, 12:06 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
|
Sorry for your news. It could be linked to the fact that SAAB, a GM subsidiary filed today for Bankrupcy Protection. The Market, I believe sees this as just the beginning.
|
|
|
02-20-2009, 06:30 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
|
So what made you buy GM stock?
|
|
|
02-21-2009, 11:02 AM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Chicago suburbs
Posts: 1,675
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by tboyer
|
Converting debt into equity is a fairly common resolution when a troubled company attempts to restructure. The process removes the debt from a company's balance sheet and converts it to net equity, diluting the existing shareholders. In the long run, the original debt holders get fair value as the company becomes profitable in the future. The problem here is there's so much debt, the holders essentially get stake in a company that's going down anyway (% ownership of nothing still equals nothing) and would likely recoup zero.
Obama will likely write the check to GM and it's suppliers to keep the house of cards from collapsing and appease the unions which showed strong support during his candidacy.
__________________
JGM
2002 Boxster S
1973 911 Green FrankenMeanie
PCA DE Instructor circa '95
|
|
|
02-21-2009, 01:40 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by jmatta
Converting debt into equity is a fairly common resolution when a troubled company attempts to restructure. The process removes the debt from a company's balance sheet and converts it to net equity, diluting the existing shareholders. In the long run, the original debt holders get fair value as the company becomes profitable in the future. The problem here is there's so much debt, the holders essentially get stake in a company that's going down anyway (% ownership of nothing still equals nothing) and would likely recoup zero.
Obama will likely write the check to GM and it's suppliers to keep the house of cards from collapsing and appease the unions which showed strong support during his candidacy.
|
Debt holders get preference over shareholders in a liquidation. Hence, most debt guys won't do this. Moreover, even if GM can come out of Chapt 11, I think the equity would be so diliuted, it would be a penny deal for them.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
02-20-2009, 06:51 PM
|
#12
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lil bastard
All these costs are either passed to you each time you buy their products, or as has more been the case, stifles their R&D committments. This has been the reason, much more than alleged stodgy thinking in the Boardroom, that has allowed so many foreign car makers to sieze their market share over the years.
|
very well said, lilbastard. The UAW is pushing hard to promote the idea that if GM flies, the car industry, and the United States are dead. Truth is, filing for bankruptcy doesn't end the company. Look at Delta.
If we keep giving GM bailout money, you and I are being forced to pay someone elses retirement fund...and here I was thinking we won the cold war against communism...
|
|
|
|
02-20-2009, 07:24 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
Reagan must be spinning in his grave!
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
02-20-2009, 07:47 PM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,209
|
You know whats amazing, all this talk about the Unions was known, known by all of us. The old saying, "Never bite the hand that feeds you" well, in the world of the UAW they didn't just bite, they ripped, chewed and swallowed the hand that fed them. And now they should all stave because of that BUT, they have an ace in the hole. A back door that's in place, and all it cost them was their vote! Now Obama is coming to the rescue to pay back the campaign promise for their support. A bailout that will secure the Union's bottom line and then the Automotive Big Two can tank, but not until the Union gets theirs.
And there isn't a damn thing we can do about it.
__________________
Sadly on the outside looking in.
"Drive it like the Doctor ordered"
|
|
|
02-21-2009, 02:17 AM
|
#15
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Corona, CA.
Posts: 129
|
idea
If GM, Ford or Chrysler had the brand equity to charge the absurd prices that Porsche does for cars and service parts, they would be in a better financial position. Just a thought.
As for the UAW jobs bank, that appears to be on the way out. The two-tier wage structure should help to bring the Detroit 3 close to wage parity with the "transplant" manufacturers, as long as they can make the VEBA work. See this:
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=ajeONmi6OjAw&refer=home
__________________
Blue-S
2000 Boxster S 6-speed - Ocean Blue / Savanna Beige
* 9x7 short shifter * Pedro's enthusiast mount * Carrera Ltw. wheels * Stebro bypass pipes
* M030 coming soon! *
Last edited by Blue-S; 02-21-2009 at 02:30 AM.
|
|
|
02-21-2009, 04:33 AM
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Use 2B NW Ohio, now NE Ohio
Posts: 563
|
GM forgot how to make money. They have been burning through cash for who knows how long. I would not buy GM stock.. you'll be throwing your money away. They do not have a long or short term plan to "make money".
Actually, the manufacturing is not their problem, its the management of the inventories, the styling options and the logistics. They offer too many cars & trucks, with too many options/colors. How many SUVs does GM offer?
Only recently are they starting to act like a company that's in trouble. Anyone's company that would lose money in a quarter would take immediate action... like Toyota is doing right now. GM has been losing money for who knows how many quarters?
Stay away from GM stock.
__________________
My Porsche mechanic drives a Saturn.
'98 Artic Silver w/ Tip
|
|
|
02-21-2009, 04:02 PM
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: los angeles
Posts: 195
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fred Demara
If we keep giving GM bailout money, you and I are being forced to pay someone elses retirement fund...and here I was thinking we won the cold war against communism...
|
If I purchase whatever widget it is that you produce, am I not paying your wage with which you fund your retirement savings? As well as your kids soccer balls, cat food, and even boxster parts? It's just that GM employees have a thing called a pension that you can point to and say Aha! There it is!
|
|
|
02-21-2009, 04:18 PM
|
#18
|
|
Guest
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by brp987
If I purchase whatever widget it is that you produce, am I not paying your wage with which you fund your retirement savings?
|
that's the point...the reason GM needs a bailout is because no one was purchasing the "widget". In capitalism, we vote on a companies success with our dollars. Overwhelmingly, Americans, and the world have voted GM out of the car making business. And in a capitalist system, when you file chapter 11, your pension is done. No rights, no wrong, no moral judgements - it's just the set of rules that define a fair market.
When the fed steps in and (against the majority of Americas wishes) MAKES us responsible for GM's success, when they have failed miserably, that is called communism.
|
|
|
|
02-21-2009, 04:31 PM
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fred Demara
that's the point...the reason GM needs a bailout is because no one was purchasing the "widget". In capitalism, we vote on a companies success with our dollars. Overwhelmingly, Americans, and the world have voted GM out of the car making business. And in a capitalist system, when you file chapter 11, your pension is done. No rights, no wrong, no moral judgements - it's just the set of rules that define a fair market.
When the fed steps in and (against the majority of Americas wishes) MAKES us responsible for GM's success, when they have failed miserably, that is called communism.
|
One correction. Depending on how GM sets up its pension, chapter 11 may have no long term impact on one's ability to collect a pension. Employers are free to fund pensions in many ways. One way is for them to purchase annuties that are prefunded. Hence, a current pensioner's funds flow may be fine and may come from say, Prudential or Allstate.
Also, some pension funds are moved to the union, who is repsonsible for investments, payouts and the like.
Not sure how the UAW's sets up their pension arrangments.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
02-21-2009, 06:04 PM
|
#20
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,209
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Fred Demara
that's the point...the reason GM needs a bailout is because no one was purchasing the "widget". In capitalism, we vote on a companies success with our dollars. Overwhelmingly, Americans, and the world have voted GM out of the car making business. And in a capitalist system, when you file chapter 11, your pension is done. No rights, no wrong, no moral judgements - it's just the set of rules that define a fair market.
When the fed steps in and (against the majority of Americas wishes) MAKES us responsible for GM's success, when they have failed miserably, that is called communism.
|
The reason Americans aren't buying their "widget's"? Simple, GM has had their arms twisted by the UAW and have been paying their "ransom" for years. That money could have been reinvested back into the company for better R&D and materials to make a better product. Instead they have had to used cheap materials and old technology. Take the throttle body fuel injection for example, GM just stopped using that late 70's early 80's crap while the rest of the world has moved on and accelerated into direct injection. Also, has anyone pushed in on a fender lately? I swear a beer can is thicker!
Why don't I buy American cars? I'm NOT going to pad the pockets of UAW or the workers that really have the golden parachute pensions and benefit packages. As an American I have the freedom to make this choice, thank God.
__________________
Sadly on the outside looking in.
"Drive it like the Doctor ordered"
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:21 PM.
| |