Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-03-2008, 07:14 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
either way, we're splitting hairs here. modifying your driving one way or the other would probably result in near immeasurable differences in fuel consumption.

wanna save fuel? drive with your top up, inflate your tires to 36psi, go slow on the freeway, and accelerate at a boring rate. me? i bought a porsche precisely because i don't like to do ANY of those things (except keep the tire pressures proper)
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 10:43 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 230
Are you guys really wanting to save a couple dollars of gas here? It seems to take more work to attempt to do all the things then just to drive freely. Gas has gone up 1.00 in the past 6 months and thats another 16 dollars per fillup, i think you guys make enough $$$
BoxsterLewis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 10:51 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
How much is perrier per gallon, how about a Starbucks latte.

Folks are funny around fuel prices.

__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 10:52 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
BTW- I asked this question last year.

How much SHOULD gas cost and how do you know that?

:dance:
__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2008, 09:35 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Lil bastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
BTW- I asked this question last year.

How much SHOULD gas cost and how do you know that?

:dance:
According to the API, it costs about $60/bbl. to drill, pump and refine a barrel of crude from on-land and coastal-water rigs and upwards of $90 for deep-sea rigs.

One barrel of crude equals 42 gallons. This will yield 47% (19.7 gal.) gasoline, 23% (10 gal.)heating oil and diesel fuel, 18% (7.5 gal.) is refined to other products including petrochemical feedstock such as polypropylene, 4% (1.7 gal.)propane, 10% (4.2 gal.) jet fuel, and 3% (1.26 gal.) asphalt. (Percentages sum to over 100 because there is approximately a 5% processing gain in refining.) - source: Energy Information Administration - http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/ask/crudeoil_faqs.asp
__________________
1990 Porsche 964 Carrera 4 Cabriolet
1976 BMW 2002
1990 BMW 325is
1999 Porsche Boxster
(gone, but not forgotten)
http://i933.photobucket.com/albums/a...smiley-003.gif

Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!
Lil bastard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 05:56 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lil bastard
According to the API, it costs about $60/bbl. to drill, pump and refine a barrel of crude from on-land and coastal-water rigs and upwards of $90 for deep-sea rigs.

One barrel of crude equals 42 gallons. This will yield 47% (19.7 gal.) gasoline, 23% (10 gal.)heating oil and diesel fuel, 18% (7.5 gal.) is refined to other products including petrochemical feedstock such as polypropylene, 4% (1.7 gal.)propane, 10% (4.2 gal.) jet fuel, and 3% (1.26 gal.) asphalt. (Percentages sum to over 100 because there is approximately a 5% processing gain in refining.) - source: Energy Information Administration - http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/ask/crudeoil_faqs.asp

That MAY be the cost of procuring the oil to gas. The second question is how much should it sell to us for?

__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 06:06 AM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 793
Send a message via Yahoo to Chills
Without reading any of these responses I will say that I tested this out the other day.

I filled up my tank and then reset the onboard computer to check my MPG.

It is only 1/2 a mile from the Shell to my house so while driving home I blipped the throttle when downshifting and braking and I watched as the MPG numbers went WAY down. It was 19.2 and dropped to 15.4 by the time I made my final turn into my garage.

When the RPMs go up the MPG goes down.
__________________
I bleed green

It's not about the summit, it's about the climb.


http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q46/chills1138/2.jpg
Chills is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 11:33 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Lil bastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
That MAY be the cost of procuring the oil to gas. The second question is how much should it sell to us for?


OK now you open up a whole new can of worms...

Crude Oil is traded as a commodity and therein lies the problem. As a commodity, it's price is based primarily on Investor Confidence - confidence that an Investor can buy it and then later sell it at a profit !

Geo-political environment and events play a much greater role in establishing this Investor Confidence than do Supply and Demand (though these too play a lesser role).

Having it commodity-based allows for much greater manipulation of the price than if it were simply a raw material bought and sold as such. There is no way of setting a price of how much it should cost us... only what we're both willing and able to pay.
__________________
1990 Porsche 964 Carrera 4 Cabriolet
1976 BMW 2002
1990 BMW 325is
1999 Porsche Boxster
(gone, but not forgotten)
http://i933.photobucket.com/albums/a...smiley-003.gif

Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!

Last edited by Lil bastard; 06-05-2008 at 11:37 AM.
Lil bastard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 04:20 AM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by BoxsterLewis
Are you guys really wanting to save a couple dollars of gas here?
Not me! I started the thread because a friend of mine is emphatic about coasting with brakes vs. engine braking for fuel economy's sake alone and I completely disagreed with him on the basis of sound logic.

I wanted some empirical data to back up his claim or mine so I could settle the argument.

Still haven't seen any yet. Great discussion and more sound logic to bolster my position in this disagreement, but no empirical data (charts, testing, results, etc.)
RandallNeighbour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 04:44 AM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Missouri
Posts: 226
You could just buy a ScanGauge II and find out exactly when fuel is and isn't being delivered (along with a bunch of other info).
http://www.scangauge.com/
__________________
http://ericfilcoff.com/pictures/986forum.jpg
2001 Boxster | 2007 Outback Sport
Need a freelance graphic designer?
Samson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2008, 03:51 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston
Posts: 116
Randall,

You could just ask me...

- Mark
Houston C4S is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 06:04 AM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
Quote:
Originally Posted by Houston C4S
Randall, You could just ask me... - Mark
Great! You've got my email address... shoot me a copy of the empirical data on engine braking and the effects it has on fuel economy in your possession.

Opinions based on sound logic have already been shared, so there's no need for any more. I want a published study by a reputable source. Got one?
RandallNeighbour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2008, 05:35 AM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 89
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandallNeighbour
Not me! I started the thread because a friend of mine is emphatic about coasting with brakes vs. engine braking for fuel economy's sake alone and I completely disagreed with him on the basis of sound logic.

I wanted some empirical data to back up his claim or mine so I could settle the argument.

Still haven't seen any yet. Great discussion and more sound logic to bolster my position in this disagreement, but no empirical data (charts, testing, results, etc.)
Having said that I agree with your friend. With your car in neutral you will start coasting sooner resulting in less fuel usage. End result you will probably be off the gas and coast for 3000 yards vs. waiting to engine brake and be of the gas for only 2000 (coasting numbers random) yards. I don't believe it's the actual braking process but the habits associated with it, ie: initiate fuel saving coasting earlier.
Ken
SoCalKen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2008, 12:45 PM   #14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 275
Quote:
Originally Posted by insite
either way, we're splitting hairs here. modifying your driving one way or the other would probably result in near immeasurable differences in fuel consumption.

wanna save fuel? drive with your top up, inflate your tires to 36psi, go slow on the freeway, and accelerate at a boring rate. me? i bought a porsche precisely because i don't like to do ANY of those things (except keep the tire pressures proper)
Good point.

If you want your paint to last longer, don't wash it.

If you want your car to last longer, don't drive it.

If you want fuel economy, find an old Geo Metro.

If you want to have fun, step on all the pedals all you want.
Wret is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page