Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-29-2008, 12:09 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 246
Problem with Lil Bastards argument is the erroneous belief that "speed kills". I will not deny that very high speeds produce more deaths then reasonable speeds.

But adherence to slow speed limits can be just as dangerous as exceeding them by 10-20 mph. There is a comfort zone that most drivers have and for an open 4 lane highway that comfot zone is about 70mph. Artificailly lowering that speed by arbitrary limits increases driver boredom significantly and results in an increase in accident rates.

So where do I get my conclusions?

A Unversity of Texas test of more than 200 drivers involved covering up speedometers and asking drivers to run 4 lane roads with little or no other traffic. Their overall average speed was 70mph.

When there was a National speed limit of 55 imposed traffic fatalaties per mile driven decreased significantly. This was hailed by safety advocates as proof that "speed kills" However when the ban was lifted and states began increasing speed limits FATALITIES PER MILE DECREASED AGAIN. So the "proof" that "speed kills" must be thrown out. Continuing decreases in death tolls point toward safer car design, increased seat belt usage, better road and signage design and decreased EMS response times. But DOES NOT say anything about the dangers of speed.

The public would be MUCH better served if safety advocates focused on better driver education in the forms of safe following distances, safety belt usage and keep right except to pass rules.

Tailgating at highway speeds is a major root cause of accidents yet since it is hard to prove after the accident occurs it is ignored in statistics. Yet it doesn't take a rocket scientist or statistician to realize the impact of have tenths of a second rather than 2 seconds to react to emergency that require sudden manuevers. With too short a time most drivers will overreact or not react at all. Overreactions result in spins and flips. No reaction results in high speed collisions.

Regards,
Alan

Last edited by renzop; 02-29-2008 at 12:18 AM.
renzop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2008, 04:20 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Loves Park IL
Posts: 355
Well as far as my driving record...

I've never had a speeding ticket, in 23 years of driving... never wrecked a car or AutoX'ed my car... (nor do I plan on). The only thing is that my parked Audi was hit in a parking lot a few years ago.

Some might ask why I even have a Porsche

So I guess Geico is perfect for me!
bmx672 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-29-2008, 06:17 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Lil bastard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Du Monde
Posts: 2,199
Well, as bmx672, I too have had no accidents or speeding tickets in many years and many more miles of driving.

But, I have to admit that this has often been more a product of luck or fate. When I was speeding, there were no police in the area. So far as accidents, well I was in the wrong place at the right time - I've had cars both in front of and behind me get into collisions.

I do drive somewhat defensively, but I'd never be accused of being the 'Little Old Lady' or 'Sunday Driver' either.

But, I do Auto-X and Race a car on the Track and again have done so for many years. This pretty much quenches the urge to drive that way on the Street. I think that is maybe the greatest benefit of participating in these sports - it satisfies an appetite that would otherwise have no outlet and might cause me to try on public roads. This why I'm an advocate for people getting it 'out of their system' in controlled environments such as these.

As far as renzop's arguements are concerned, I don't disagree at all. There have been studies showing speed having little or no effect in the Traffic Fatality rate/mi. But, they offer no data for non-fatal accidents. Nor, do they take account of the mediating effects of increased safety devices or crashworthiness. The IIHS (Insurance Institute for Highway Safety) has data which disputes these findings. Many advocates of higher speeds and less enforcement will infer a bias as the IIHS is funded soley by the Ins. industry. But, the IIHS is considered by most to be more stringent than the NHTSA in vehicle crash ratings. I think people tend to side with whichever group, test, or statistics support their own views.

In then end, I think the arguements are all but moot. The rapid spread of Speed Cameras and other unmanned devices are going to make enforcement much more prevalent and will force us all to drive at lower avg. speeds.
__________________
1990 Porsche 964 Carrera 4 Cabriolet
1976 BMW 2002
1990 BMW 325is
1999 Porsche Boxster
(gone, but not forgotten)
http://i933.photobucket.com/albums/a...smiley-003.gif

Never drive faster than your Guardian Angel can fly!
Lil bastard is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page