Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-17-2007, 11:47 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,518
mslayden,

I think this will answer your questions :

http://www.weissach.net/986-987_RoadTestSummary.html

Nick
__________________
*
http://i146.photobucket.com/albums/r...s/DSC03717.jpg

1999 986 ( Black )
1998 MB C280 ( Black )
1999 BMW K1200RS ( Yellow )
2005 Audi A4 ( Red )
NickCats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 11:54 AM   #2
blkboxster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
My 2.5 , best times were 5.5 and 5.9 6.1 to 60mph
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 12:40 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
MS, buy the newest boxster with the largest engine you can find.

3.2 is the minimum you should look at in my opinion... 3.4 would be better.

While I'm enjoying the 2.5 with some HP and torque mods that put it just barely ahead of a 2.7, that extra power is wanted.

No one ever said, "Geez, I wish I had bought the model with the smaller engine"
RandallNeighbour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 03:16 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Brentwood TN
Posts: 2
Thanks...

Thanks guys. All of you. Nick that was a most thorough report. Exactly what I was looking for. I agree that straight line is more about 0-60 and the Boxster's forte is more about the twisties. But, power is power and I do love that. I just wanted to get a feel for the engine size while I try to compare to the price.... I have heard on more than one occasion that I should try to get newer the better. when did the 987 series start? I feel like I should focus on that one or newer. Generally speaking, what makes the difference in the 987 and can you tell by looking at it what generation it is?
mslayden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 03:26 PM   #5
bmussatti
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by mslayden
Thanks guys. All of you. Nick that was a most thorough report. Exactly what I was looking for. I agree that straight line is more about 0-60 and the Boxster's forte is more about the twisties. But, power is power and I do love that. I just wanted to get a feel for the engine size while I try to compare to the price.... I have heard on more than one occasion that I should try to get newer the better. when did the 987 series start? I feel like I should focus on that one or newer. Generally speaking, what makes the difference in the 987 and can you tell by looking at it what generation it is?
The Boxster 987 started in 2005.

Porsche said the 987 was 80% re-designed vs. the 986.

Yes, you can visually tell the difference between the two, but you need to know what to look for. The biggest give-away are the side vents. The 987's are larger and triagular in shape.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 05:02 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 109
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandallNeighbour
MS, buy the newest boxster with the largest engine you can find.

3.2 is the minimum you should look at in my opinion... 3.4 would be better.
I always heard that it's not the size that matters, but what you do with it, that counts
__________________
'07 987 - Silver/Black, Bose, Xenons, 18" S Wheels, Love It
baseball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-17-2007, 05:11 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 3,417
Send a message via AIM to blinkwatt
Get a 'S',you won't regret it. I smile every time I touch the gas.
__________________
-99' Zenith Blue 5-spd...didn't agree with a center divider on the freeway
-01' S Orient Red Metallic 6-spd...money pit...sold to buy a house
blinkwatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 04:36 AM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Clemente, CA, USA
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by RandallNeighbour
No one ever said, "Geez, I wish I had bought the model with the smaller engine"
Truer words were never spoken, there is no reason other than lack of $$$ to get the smaller-engined, narrow-tired, soft-suspension cars. My '97 base has a few modifications that allow it to do 0-60 in about 4.6 s and let me tell you that I do that every chance I get. In general, my Box has the ability to pull more Gs in every direction than a stock one; big numbers with balance is the key to a really fun car.

Eric
efahl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 05:22 AM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,027
Quote:

"My '97 base has a few modifications that allow it to do 0-60 in about 4.6 s"

Posted by efahl.

You got forced induction in that thing?? Can't IMAGINE how you'd be pulling THAT hard without it in a '97 base model...
Frodo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2007, 06:45 AM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
Eric, I'd like a complete list of mods you've made asap... how on earth are you getting sub 5 second times with "just a few" modifications? I need to do those few mods myself!
RandallNeighbour is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page