10-24-2007, 06:30 AM
|
#1
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Every system in the transmission is built with what's called a factor of safety, which means they are overdesigned for purposes of functionality under extreme conditions, accounting for any manufacturing variations/defects, accounting for any misjudgement in engineering or inaccuracy in calculation, and longevity. When a more powerful engine is placed in a car that wasn't designed to accept it, this margin for safety is reduced, but it still may be enough for the car to work, at least for a while.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 09:24 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Annapolis Maryland
Posts: 1,528
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue2000s
Every system in the transmission is built with what's called a factor of safety, which means they are overdesigned for purposes of functionality under extreme conditions, accounting for any manufacturing variations/defects, accounting for any misjudgement in engineering or inaccuracy in calculation, and longevity. When a more powerful engine is placed in a car that wasn't designed to accept it, this margin for safety is reduced, but it still may be enough for the car to work, at least for a while.
|
So that's why I go through so many AODs.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 09:40 AM
|
#3
|
Guest
|
This is what I think Tholyoak is saying:
Let's say you have a 986 Boxster with 240 HP. If it looses 15% HP (or 36 hp) you have about 204 HP at the wheels.
Now you do a engine swap with a 3.6L engine that has maybe 330 HP. It will be in the same car with the same exact tranny, tires, everything. So, how much HP to the wheels? 330- 36= 294 HP or 330-15% (50 hp) = 280??
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 10:13 AM
|
#4
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmussatti
This is what I think Tholyoak is saying:
Let's say you have a 986 Boxster with 240 HP. If it looses 15% HP (or 36 hp) you have about 204 HP at the wheels.
Now you do a engine swap with a 3.6L engine that has maybe 330 HP. It will be in the same car with the same exact tranny, tires, everything. So, how much HP to the wheels? 330- 36= 294 HP or 330-15% (50 hp) = 280??
|
Like Lucky and I said, 15%.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 10:14 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Annapolis Maryland
Posts: 1,528
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmussatti
This is what I think Tholyoak is saying:
Let's say you have a 986 Boxster with 240 HP. If it looses 15% HP (or 36 hp) you have about 204 HP at the wheels.
Now you do a engine swap with a 3.6L engine that has maybe 330 HP. It will be in the same car with the same exact tranny, tires, everything. So, how much HP to the wheels? 330- 36= 294 HP or 330-15% (50 hp) = 280??
|
I think 280, but of course, I didn't finish engineering school. I went a different route.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 10:35 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 530
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grizzly
So that's why I go through so many AODs. 
|
No, it's your right foot that's to blame.
__________________
Jack
2000 Boxster S - gone -
2006 Audi A6 Quattro 3.2
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 02:54 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Glen Allen, ON
Posts: 314
|
OK well I really didn't believe that in transplanting my 2.5L engine for my 3.6L X51 motor that it takes 15 more hp to get the power from the crank to the wheels.
I think I found the answer. It turns out that the 15% loss has to do with the rate of acceleration of the large drums on an inertial dyno. On a load control dyno, you assume a constant amount of parasitic drive train loss.
A good explanation can be found here for those that are interested.
http://home.earthlink.net/~spchurch/churchautomotivetesting/id12.html
Todd
__________________
Current Cars:
1989 911 Targa
1984 944 Original Owner
1971 911T
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 02:59 PM
|
#8
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by tholyoak
OK well I really didn't believe that in transplanting my 2.5L engine for my 3.6L X51 motor that it takes 15 more hp to get the power from the crank to the wheels.
I think I found the answer. It turns out that the 15% loss has to do with the rate of acceleration of the large drums on an inertial dyno. On a load control dyno, you assume a constant amount of parasitic drive train loss.
A good explanation can be found here for those that are interested.
http://home.earthlink.net/~spchurch/churchautomotivetesting/id12.html
Todd
|
That's accounted for and subtracted out when you get the dyno sheet so it's not part of the loss we're talking about. You're stuck with 15% man.
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 03:26 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Shawnee, KS
Posts: 159
|
I pulled 207 HP and 172TQ on Imagine Auto's dyno. I have a 2000 2.7 with EVO intake, headers and exhaust. Heres the ? should I do the GIAC flash or is it worth it? By the 15% I am already getting 243.6 HP to the crank. Will the Ecu flash really ad more?
|
|
|
10-24-2007, 03:30 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 916
|
"I pulled 207 HP and 172TQ on Imagine Auto's dyno. I have a 2000 2.7 with EVO intake, headers and exhaust. Heres the ? should I do the GIAC flash or is it worth it? By the 15% I am already getting 243.6 HP to the crank. Will the Ecu flash really ad more?"
I picked up about 12 hp when I added a chip to my car.
Ed
__________________
My Car Webpage
2000 2.7L Boxster 102K; TTP intake, headers, high-flow cats; Dansk high-flow muffler; Autothority ECU chip; TechnoTorque 2; Bilstein coilovers; Racing Dynamics strut brace; stress-bar suspension kit; Aasco lightweight flywheel, B&M short shiftkit; 18" wheels; spare tire delete; OEM GT3 seats; JL audio speakers and subwoofer; Alpine PDX-5/PDX-2 amps; Kenwood DNX8120 CD/DVD/Nav; litronics, deambered
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:29 PM.
| |