Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-2007, 09:18 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 307
93 octane gas only?

Does the boxster / S require 93 octane gas only?

__________________
Lamborghini Murcielago (current)
Supercharged Viper SRT-10 800 HP Special Edition #49 of #50 (current)
Ferrari 360 Spider
Lamborghini Diablo VT Roadster
911 Cab
Boxster S (current)
08 Hummer H2 (current)
BMW Z3 (current)

Limos in Ohio and PA - First Class Limo Columbus Limos

http://pteam.net/avatar3.jpg
my car collection *Porschephiles agree, Desnorkify your Porsche!*
pteam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2007, 09:56 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: new orleans
Posts: 24
allegedly (it's recommended). i'm sure there'll be disagreement, but i don't think you'll blow up if you run 87. you most likely won't be as fast, and i probably wouldn't flog the car through extreme heat/mountains/etc.
nola mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 03:34 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 292
Nola Mike wrote:
> you most likely won't be as fast

Actually, it's rather the opposite -- lower octane (with no pinging) will give you more power, and hence, better MPG. Here's something from a previous discussion I had with my Ducati racing friends:

The term "Premium" is extremely misleading when it comes to gasoline. People assume that when they buy "Premium" they are buying the best there is to offer. This couldn't be further from the truth. 87 octane has more potential horsepower than 93 (or higher) octane. Octane is a rating. It is a calculation that predicts when pre-ignition will occur in any given engine. The lower the octane number the more volatile the gasoline -- by comparison, the higher the octane number the less volatile (combustible) the gasoline. Then why do racers use higher octane? Simple, the higher compression and more ignition advance an engine has, the more likely pre-ignition will occur -- hence, they need high octane fuel to prevent this from happening. If you want your engine to run the best possible, then run the LOWEST octane that you can without pre-ignition (pinging). If different terminology was used to distinguish grades of gasoline, people would think more accurately about it -- for example, instead of calling it "Regular" call it "Highest Volatility" and instead of "Premium" call it "Least Volatile".
Peer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 04:21 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
I have run 91 with no issues.
__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 05:09 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 939
Stick with 91/93 octane. Your engine will run best on it, and get the best efficiency.

In engines with higher compression ratios, where higher octane is recommended, you can lose power and possibly damage the engine if you use lower octane fuel.

Vice versa is not really true, either. In a vehicle that runs normally on regular, you gain NOTHING by using higher octane fuel.


Higher octane ratings in fuel only increase the fuel's threshold for detonation. In high compression engines, or forced induction systems, it is necessary.


You bought a Porsche. You didn't skimp. Don't skimp on fuel.
__________________
2001 Boxster - Grey on Grey
1969 911T Targa - 'Stinky'

http://www.zoto.com/frayadjacent/img...f27a-4a399.jpg <---- my car. ^ crap I post.

"The existence of the flamethrower is evidence that someone, somewhere once said 'I want to set those people over there on fire, but I don't want to have to walk over there to do it.'"
FrayAdjacent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 09:30 AM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by pteam
Does the boxster / S require 93 octane gas only?
This is a damn ass thread... especially from a guy who owns a yellow Lambo and Ferraris. Pteam for Poseur Team?

Although, lately I see a lot of LAMBOS driving around Chelsea NY. Hmmm...Not like theirs anything wrong with that!
porscheracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 11:26 AM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peer
Nola Mike wrote:
> you most likely won't be as fast

Actually, it's rather the opposite -- lower octane (with no pinging) will give you more power, and hence, better MPG.
That doesn't seem to be quite accurate.

"It is important to note that the theoretical energy content of gasoline
when burned in air is only related to the hydrogen and carbon contents.
The energy is released when the hydrogen and carbon are oxidised (burnt),
to form water and carbon dioxide. Octane rating is not fundamentally
related to the energy content, and the actual hydrocarbon and oxygenate
components used in the gasoline will determine both the energy release and
the antiknock rating."

In short, octane rating defines how fast the gas burns, and how resistant it is to pre-ignition. It does not define how much energy content the gas has, so lower octane gas can't make more power. It doesn't have any more energy to offer than higher octane gas, it can just be burned in a less-demanding environment. Running a turbo or a high compression ratio? Then you need a better-behaved fuel (a higher octane rating). Same energy content, but better manners.
__________________
Jack
2000 Boxster S - gone -
2006 Audi A6 Quattro 3.2
JackG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 01:03 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 292
JackG wrote:
> That doesn't seem to be quite accurate.

I'm sorry if I rain on anyone's parade -- but the lower the octane you can get away with (without pinging), the more power.

-- peer
Peer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 01:27 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peer
JackG wrote:
> That doesn't seem to be quite accurate.

I'm sorry if I rain on anyone's parade -- but the lower the octane you can get away with (without pinging), the more power.

-- peer
No rain here... the science just doesn't back you up on this. It seems you have a misconception on what "volatile" means. It is not a measurement of energy content.

You wrote "87 octane has more potential horsepower than 93 (or higher) octane." "The lower the octane number the more volatile the gasoline -- by comparison, the higher the octane number the less volatile (combustible) the gasoline."

You are asserting that the more volatile gas is, the more horsepower it can produce. That's simply incorrect. They have different burn characteristics, but the same amount of energy. Energy produces horsepower, not volatility.
__________________
Jack
2000 Boxster S - gone -
2006 Audi A6 Quattro 3.2
JackG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 02:43 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrayAdjacent
Stick with 91/93 octane. Your engine will run best on it, and get the best efficiency.

In engines with higher compression ratios, where higher octane is recommended, you can lose power and possibly damage the engine if you use lower octane fuel.

Vice versa is not really true, either. In a vehicle that runs normally on regular, you gain NOTHING by using higher octane fuel.


Higher octane ratings in fuel only increase the fuel's threshold for detonation. In high compression engines, or forced induction systems, it is necessary.


You bought a Porsche. You didn't skimp. Don't skimp on fuel.

I couldn't have said it any better. You're absolutely right! For example, my last car that I had used regular gas, then I dropped a Jackson Racing Supercharger in it and I had to switch to a higher octane fuel. More oxegen per ltr. of gas burns faster and therefore runs leaner, not richer. If a car requires a leaner mixture of gasoline I would not use a richer version because if will not co-inside with the cars CPU and air/fuel ratio.
porsche986spyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 03:22 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Where the Sewer Meets the Sea, CA. USA
Posts: 2,695
Send a message via MSN to CJ_Boxster
Quote:
Originally Posted by porscheracer
This is a damn ass thread... especially from a guy who owns a yellow Lambo and Ferraris. Pteam for Poseur Team?

Although, lately I see a lot of LAMBOS driving around Chelsea NY. Hmmm...Not like theirs anything wrong with that!
Did you run out of Vagisil???
__________________
--Proud Boxster Owner/Tech,

Carlos J Cazares

FastForward Performance
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...er/newsig1.jpg
CJ_Boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 03:27 PM   #12
blkboxster
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ_Boxster
Did you run out of Vagisil???


HAHAHAHHA, LOL
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 05:23 PM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 49
High Test Gas

A gallon of gas whether high test or regular has the same amount of energy. The engine of your Boxster will convert the chemical energy of the gas to mechanical energy to move the car. Porsche designs its engines under the assumption you will use 93 or 91 Octane and sets ignition timing to ensure there is no knocking and the car gets the max power and fuel economy for the expected Octane. When you use lower Octane fuel the car will have a tendency to knock so the knock sensor will sense the beginning of engine knock and tell the ECU to adjust (retard) timing to protect the engine. Eventually if you consistently run low test the ECU will automatically assume there is something unusual and either automatically retard timing or spit out an error code (according to some Porsche Gurus the ECU will adjust after about 25 to 30 hours but I have never seen it in writing.) That assumes all of the protective features work proberly. If not, for example if you go full throttle and there is no early indication of knock you could knock before timing is retarded and harm your engine.

Since the car will frequently have retarded timing while running 87 Octane, it will not be operating at peak efficiency and thus produce less power and worst Gas Mileage. Cars that are designed for regular will see no improvement by using high test. However, many chip tuners get their best results by programming for 93 Octane vice the 93 or 91 octane spec called premium in various states and recommended by Porsche.

ATB.
Tom
trube78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 05:43 PM   #14
Registered User
 
MikeinLA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 33
I don't think I've run into higher than 91 octane. Is there a station that routinely sells 93 octane as their premium? I ran into 100 octane racecar gas once, but it was 5 bucks a gallon. Ouch!

Mike
MikeinLA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 07:26 PM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 97
Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeinLA
I don't think I've run into higher than 91 octane. Is there a station that routinely sells 93 octane as their premium? I ran into 100 octane racecar gas once, but it was 5 bucks a gallon. Ouch!

Mike
come to east coast and see 93s. well, i think it all depends on which state you are in but in VA/DC/MD you have choice of 87, 89, or 93 and no option for 91. i think i saw 91 in Ontario and NJ.

i think i read somewhere that there are 2 methods of calculating the octane rating. maybe 91 served in CA is same as 93 served in DC area?
spark00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2007, 07:37 PM   #16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 49
Octane Rating

It varies by state or locale. 93 Octane is available on the east coast, 91 is the max in many states. You will also see different maximums in Mountain areas. So ... yes it is available but probably not in your area. However, unless your Boxster has been chipped, the factory ECU is tuned for both 91 and 93 Octane U.S. gasoline. It should provide optimum power and torque with either. Increasing Octane to 95 without reprogramming the ECU probably won't buy you anything either. The ECU will be unable to advance the timing to take advantage of the higher Octane. Although I suppose you could burn hotter plugs which may get you something.
ATB,
Tom
trube78 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 05:39 AM   #17
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: new york
Posts: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJ_Boxster
Did you run out of Vagisil???
are you asking me if i want some of your extra stash? no thanks bro i am not gay. not like theres anything wrong with that.

porscheracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 06:36 AM   #18
Registered User
 
Brucelee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
Octane threads go nowhere.

Kind of like Oil threads.

__________________
Rich Belloff

Brucelee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 07:59 AM   #19
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Puget Sound
Posts: 176
Quote:
"Octane threads go nowhere.

Kind of like Oil threads."


Interesting, though, for us Newbs. I was always under the impression higher octane gas was yielded more power. Now I know better.
__________________
- Jim

2000 Boxster S, Speed Yellow, Michelin AS/3 tires, 60,000 miles...
... and climbing.
OldBlevins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-21-2007, 09:57 AM   #20
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Where the Sewer Meets the Sea, CA. USA
Posts: 2,695
Send a message via MSN to CJ_Boxster
Quote:
Originally Posted by porscheracer
are you asking me if i want some of your extra stash? no thanks bro i am not gay. not like theres anything wrong with that.


LOL got me.... but im not gay either, not that there is anything wrong with being gay.

__________________
--Proud Boxster Owner/Tech,

Carlos J Cazares

FastForward Performance
http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a1...er/newsig1.jpg
CJ_Boxster is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page