Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-24-2007, 10:17 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 530
This is getting out of hand, but I'll play one more time...

Quote:

"i'm not confused; numerals refer only to the volatility of the fuel."

Unless you're peer posting under a different handle, I wasn't referring to you. My post was a follow-up to his post. Are you peer?


Quote:

"how is it better behaved? does it ask permission before pre-detonating? it doesn't detonate as easily, that's it."

Bingo. It is better quality (better behaved) because it doesn't detonate as easily.

"how about diesel engines?"

Non-sequitur.

"what are these "highly desirable burn characteristics" you're talking about? "

Resistance to pre-ignition.



Quote:


""making the premium fuel necessary in some engines that require it.""

"agreed, except for the "necessary" part."

Really? You know more than the OEM's? Cool.

A high compression or turbo engine "requires" high octane gas. You own story about your boost gauge proves that. The protection that the OEM builds into the engine management is just that... protection. The engine wants/needs/requires premium to operate in its design performance envelope. The OEM tells you that. You're smarter than they are?



Quote:

"that's the point of the thread."

Actually, the thread was started by someone asking if 93 was necessary. You replied "allegedly (it's recommended). i'm sure there'll be disagreement, but i don't think you'll blow up if you run 87. you most likely won't be as fast, and i probably wouldn't flog the car through extreme heat/mountains/etc."

Actually, it is recommended, not just "allegedly". You don't "think" it will blow up. That makes us all feel more secure. You agree it will lose power. That's my point... thanks.


Quote:

"what would be the "first" ditch effort to save the engine?"

Retarding timing, enrichening the mixture, cutting fuel/spark are some that come to mind. You do realize that the boost is produced by exhaust gases, right? It could be you are seeing the results of other adjustments when you see boost drop. Kill spark, kill fuel, reduce exhaust gas, boost drops.

"no, this is the first and only adjustment made in response to pre-detonation. if i (and the knock sensor) don't notice pinging, then it ain't happening. and agreed, that's the engine management system doing its job--preventing potential engine damage."

Did you write the software that runs the engine computer? Are you completely sure that the turbo boost is the only response that it has? Cite? Besides, the knock sensor can hear pinging before you do.



Quote:


"the manufacturer specifies it because under some circumstances, you won't get as good performance, and possibly fuel economy, on lower grade fuel. not always, not even usually. they specify it because it gives an extra margin of safety which may or may not be needed. "

Is it performance, or safety? You bounce around in your thought about why they specify premium. And you also wrote that you "don't think you'll blow up if you run 87", but now it's for safety? What exactly is it you do think?

"it's quite possible that the engine detunes under some circumstances when using lower grade fuel. is that dangerous to the engine? no. does it degrade performance under these circumstances? yes."

No... it's a fact that it detunes. The OEM's state that is exactly what they do.

"which engineering class explained to you the differences between premium and unleaded fuel and their effects on sports car performance? right, that's what i thought. if yer gonna flame, maybe you should have some facts or references to back up your bs?"

I'm waiting for your cites, references, and engineering classes to back up your BS. If you require them for me, surely you have them for your own BS, right?

BTW.. I didn't flame you. You seemed to take it personally. Maybe you should learn to read a thread, and remember what you said back in post two of this thread, " i'm sure there'll be disagreement". There is, and you're surprised?

BTW... pony up for a shift key. Capital letters... what a concept.

__________________
Jack
2000 Boxster S - gone -
2006 Audi A6 Quattro 3.2

Last edited by JackG; 06-24-2007 at 10:22 PM.
JackG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 12:51 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 292
I wonder why some people on this forum often resort to personal attacks, as if they were struggling with a self-esteem issue that brings an animosity towards other forum members (who they obviously have never met, or know).

F.ex, while everyone in this thread stuck nicely to the issue at hand, JackG decided to go off on some frivolous personal attacks:

> They do it for a reason, and it's not to give a liberal arts poetry
> writer something to argue about, on a subject matter in which he
> seemingly doesn't have a clue.
>
> Take a freakin' engineering class.

I'm not sure if the above was addressed to me, though, I'm fairly certain that JackG knows little to nothing about what classes his fellow forum members have taken over the years.

-- peer
Peer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 01:25 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
Seems to me that whenver I see the tuner parts guys showing a dyno chart for their latest exhaust or intake, headers, etc. they are almost always running the car on race fuel (higer than 93) to arrive at their higher HP claims.
The admission that widely available "consumer" gas was not used during the dyno is usually burriend in the fine print.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Perfectlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 02:30 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 530
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peer
I'm not sure if the above was addressed to me, though, I'm fairly certain that JackG knows little to nothing about what classes his fellow forum members have taken over the years.
-- peer
My comments were obviously about, and intended for, you. You could only have missed that if you are as ignorant as you have said that we Americans are.

I was merely trying, again, to straighten out the fallacies you keep posting about gasoline. You have shared info with us all, here and on your web page, that makes it obvious you don't have an engineering head on you. However, I stepped over the line a bit, so I'll retract.

In the future, when you post misinformation again, you can still expect to be corrected.

Have a good day.
__________________
Jack
2000 Boxster S - gone -
2006 Audi A6 Quattro 3.2
JackG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2007, 03:04 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Peer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 292
JackG wrote:
> you don't have an engineering head on you.

As I said earlier, little do you know about me or my education, so please stop pretending.

-- peer
Peer is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page