986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners - View Single Post

CRNile · 09-28-2017, 10:36 AM

Thanks for your input. I thought that the IMS was extra. The fact that it drove so well and no codes indicated that something was wrong with the assessment. There was some thought that the initial testing caused the deviation to jamb at 14.

I do feel sorry for the new owner and may send him some money in good faith, but not $1,500. I just wanted him to have a good experience.

09-28-2017, 10:36 AM	#5
CRNile Chuck Join Date: Jan 2014 Location: Portola Valley, CA Posts: 4	Thanks Thanks for your input. I thought that the IMS was extra. The fact that it drove so well and no codes indicated that something was wrong with the assessment. There was some thought that the initial testing caused the deviation to jamb at 14. I do feel sorry for the new owner and may send him some money in good faith, but not $1,500. I just wanted him to have a good experience.