View Single Post
Old 11-11-2015, 01:12 PM   #4
JFP in PA
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by diff operator View Post
Interesting, I thought I had just read that it indicated that they were lean?
This is a common problem with internet discussions of P1128 and 1130. On the early cars (up to 1999) which had the 5.2.2 DME, P1128 and 1130 were the codes for an overly lean condition. However, on the 2000-2001 cars with the 7.2 DME as well as the later 7.8 DME, the same two codes (P1128 and 1130) were for an over rich condition; exactly the opposite condition.

Again, this one of many examples of why I tell people that use out of date or incomplete bootlegged service manuals to always double check their information; unless you have the complete OBD II diagnostics manual for the 986 series, including the more than 100 supplements covering issues like the above, you could easily end up chasing your tail..............
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein

Last edited by JFP in PA; 11-11-2015 at 01:15 PM.
JFP in PA is offline   Reply With Quote