Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
The IMSG gives the advanced notice that an issue is imminent and no other device or process to date has been able do this. That advanced notice is what allows engines to be saved before collateral damage occurs that takes the engine out.
Either someone sees benefit in such a system, or they don't... Those that do see benefit buy it and the others do not, that's the freedom that we all have as Americans.
|
It's not that simple, though is it? Some kind of explanation and demonstration of how it works is necessary to make a rational decision over the merits of the system.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
That's said, the first 500 units are almost already spoken for in less than one week of pre-sales with zero advertisement and people still don't even know how it works. The do know what it offers and that's enough to captivate them.
|
All they know is that you claim it warns of IMS bearing failure and ten other undisclosed (as far as I know) problems. The fact that they buy it on spec I assume reflects their desperation to avoid this problem more than anything else.
To draw a slightly unfair analogy, faith healers still do a roaring trade in our supposedly enlightened age by promising to help desperate people. But they're still fraudsters exploiting the vulnerable.
I'm not accusing you of anything remotely that sinister, but the way you tend to present your solutions with a general tone of "my stuff works and you'll have to take my word for it, everyone else does" I personally find a little arrogant.
I absolutely hope your failure detection device works as advertised, if so it's a great innovation. I just wish you came across as a bit more open and forthcoming and that your tone wasn't a bit redolent of someone making hyperbolic claims. I'm sure you and your company do some great work, but your tone is a bit off putting.
Believe in it? Great, buy it.
Don't believe in it? Don't buy it.
Its that simple.
That's said, the first 500 units are almost already spoken for in less than one week of pre-sales with zero advertisement and people still don't even know how it works. The do know what it offers and that's enough to captivate them.
I was basing nothing on the 3 cars here now except the fact that all of them could have been saved if advanced warning was given and the proper action was taken. When the female owner of one of them saw the technology employed in one of our test cars she asked why in the world we didn't come out with it sooner.
The IMS bearing failure isn't what generally drives the stake in the heart if the engine, it's a primary mode of failure that leads to collateral damage that is much worse and not able to be solved without complete engine teardown.
The female driver we were referring to has an IMS bearing that is still intact, but has failed. What took her off the road was a rod knock that was created from collateral damage. Her IMS bearing could be retrofitted today and she would still have a rod knock, if caught early enough the whole situation could have been much different and instead if 15k, she would be looking at 3k with a credit applied from my company if she had the IMSG employed.
The choice is yours.[/QUOTE]