02-23-2007, 04:37 PM
|
#61
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 283
|
@ Everyone-- Lets just all de-snorkel and be happy for the great sounds we have just unleashed and the possibility of 1-2% more HP ±2% of that HP.
@ All the engineers-- These debates make the common man (myself) just smile. I have no idea what is being debated, yet love the fact that it is! Keep it up everyone!
__________________
2000 Porsche Boxster S
2007 Lexus RX350
|
|
|
02-23-2007, 04:44 PM
|
#62
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue2000s
That's totally incorrect. It's always a restriction and there will always be some pressure drop, no matter how much or little the engine is pulling in as long as some air is moving. A flow bench would show a pressure drop as soon as any air started flowing through the snorkel.
|
Hi,
Of course you are correct. I just meant to express that I just think this differential in pressure has little to no effect on overall Volumetric Efficiency which of course is a major determinant in how much power the engine can produce.
I'm not convinced that the Snorkel makes a significant difference, but that aside, I don't think the lister has proven otherwise.
Mrs. MNBoxster is away doing the Accenture Match Play Tourney in Tucson, and I'm having some guys over tonight for a little Boozer. But, I have a neat little engine where I can model AVF, TAF rates and VE, for given engine volumes and parameters. I'll plug in the Boxster data to see what we're looking at. With that, and some measurements of the Snorkel (which I have on a shelf in my garage), we should be able to have something more concrete. But, It will be a day or two.
I'll come back to this in a separate thread. Hope to have your input there...
Happy Motoring!... Jim'99
|
|
|
02-23-2007, 05:10 PM
|
#63
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 277
|
self-levelling annoyance
Jim, while we're on the topic of factoring in variables, do remember to take into account the "self-levelling annoyance" caused by the vodka you mentioned in a previous thread.
|
|
|
02-23-2007, 08:08 PM
|
#64
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hacienda Heights, Ca
Posts: 75
|
Wow..this is so sad...so much happened on the board while I spent more time beating my poor S on the dyno today. I have repeated the results on 17...yes 17 passes with and without the "snork". The data remains the same. For what it is worth, this mod produces 4.6~5.5whp at high rpms. Whew!
__________________
Bisimoto Engineering
2001 modified Boxster S, slate grey, red interior
Last edited by Bisimoto; 02-23-2007 at 08:09 PM.
Reason: more info
|
|
|
02-23-2007, 09:52 PM
|
#65
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanna986
Jim, while we're on the topic of factoring in variables, do remember to take into account the "self-levelling annoyance" caused by the vodka you mentioned in a previous thread.
|
Hi,
What's that all about? You're just being NASTY! No call for that - shame, shame... That's very Clintonesque - attack the detractors - congratulations! Anyway you cut it, thats a cheap shot - Thanks for your valuable contribution to this thread. Feel Good now?...
Last edited by MNBoxster; 02-23-2007 at 10:36 PM.
|
|
|
02-23-2007, 10:10 PM
|
#66
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bisimoto
Wow..this is so sad...so much happened on the board while I spent more time beating my poor S on the dyno today. I have repeated the results on 17...yes 17 passes with and without the "snork". The data remains the same. For what it is worth, this mod produces 4.6~5.5whp at high rpms. Whew!
|
Hi,
Well you're certainly getting consistent results. I may be starting to come around.
This is for the 3.2L, I doubt the 2.5L w/o egas, Motronic ME 7.2 and variable intake will achieve anywhere near the same result.
I called a friend who owns a shop w/ 2 inertial dynos, and just for ********************s and giggles, I'm gonna run over there this spring and see what it tells me, even with the tire dynamisicm, I should also get consistent positive results based on your findings. A good engineer is also intuitive and still I have this nagging sense that something's amiss.
But, at least for now - You Da Man! Congrats!
Happy Motoring!... Jim'99
|
|
|
02-24-2007, 06:33 AM
|
#67
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MNBoxster
Hi,
What's that all about? You're just being NASTY! No call for that - shame, shame... That's very Clintonesque - attack the detractors - congratulations! Anyway you cut it, thats a cheap shot - Thanks for your valuable contribution to this thread. Feel Good now?...
|
Jim,
I may be wrong, but judging by the "tone" and context of his post, I am sure he was only joking.
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
02-24-2007, 07:56 PM
|
#68
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 277
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bavarian Motorist
Jim,
I may be wrong, but judging by the "tone" and context of his post, I am sure he was only joking.
|
Self-levelling annoyance
I think Jim knows I'm joking
|
|
|
02-24-2007, 08:01 PM
|
#69
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wanna986
|
Could've fooled me But maybe that was the point
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
02-25-2007, 08:57 AM
|
#70
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: lexington park maryland
Posts: 15
|
good reading on this post. The "snorkle" is from what I can feel and hear on my 2000 S is definitely a mod one needs to do for what ever reason. Now some data on added hp. There seem to be the question on how to do this. well here's the link.
http://www.ppbb.com/boards/ppbbphp/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Board=ARCHIVES&Number=820409&page=&view=&sb=&o=
One might have a calibrated body to feel the gain but you sure can hear the change from doing the mod.
Ben
|
|
|
02-27-2007, 09:22 AM
|
#71
|
07 Carrera S Cab
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,273
|
Is there really that much of a difference in sound? I've driven a few of my friends' Boxsters with the snork removed, and didn't really notice much difference from mine, hence never removing my snork.
__________________
Current: 07 Carrera S Cab in Midnight Blue
Previous: 01 Boxster in Arctic Silver, 86 944 in Guards Red
|
|
|
02-27-2007, 12:11 PM
|
#72
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 14
|
Cool
Thanks for the great info. For most of us, it's not worth the cost of the dyno run. But it's good to know.
Did you alternate snork, no snork, snork, no snork, etc.? The reason I ask is that the DME does some weird ignition advancement/retardation compensation when it senses a change in air flow. I know that if I unplug my MAF, I get a noticeable increase in power.
Would you be willing to try the same thing with the stock air filter versus K&N?
|
|
|
02-27-2007, 02:34 PM
|
#73
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefan (Boston)
Thanks for the great info. For most of us, it's not worth the cost of the dyno run. But it's good to know.
Did you alternate snork, no snork, snork, no snork, etc.? The reason I ask is that the DME does some weird ignition advancement/retardation compensation when it senses a change in air flow. I know that if I unplug my MAF, I get a noticeable increase in power.
Would you be willing to try the same thing with the stock air filter versus K&N?
|
Huh...
That's interesting. I was wondering about that.
Will remove mine tomorrow, btw
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
02-27-2007, 03:13 PM
|
#74
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 105
|
Congratultions on your new Boxster project car!
Thank you for posting your dyno info. I will look forward to your continued HARD work on your Boxster.
I have put up a suggestion that Deluboz send you a set of headers to dyno.
We all have been searching for reliable test data on ALL matter of engine modifications --- as you can see by the reponses to your post
You have sparked great interest with your Dyno results -- I will continue to watch for all your future hard work results and appreciate your efforts to document the work (especially the photos).
Take care,
Ed
|
|
|
02-28-2007, 07:02 AM
|
#75
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 14
|
When you unplug the MAF you will get a CEL. You can easily reset it by disconnecting the battery for a short time (first make sure you have your radio code if your car is pre-2003) or by using a OBD-II reader.
When you unplug the MAF the car freaks out briefly. Then it uses an approximation (based on throttle body temperature readings, I believe) to decide how much air is coming in. The car has a tendency to stall when warmed up and idling. But in my base 1999 Boxster, I could keep up with 2000-2002 BoxsterS cars in flat out acceleration up to very high speeds.
|
|
|
02-28-2007, 07:43 AM
|
#76
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hacienda Heights, Ca
Posts: 75
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stefan (Boston)
Would you be willing to try the same thing with the stock air filter versus K&N?
|
Yes. My race team is sponsored by K&N. In the next couple of weeks, I will order a K&N filter from the factory for the S and post results as well.
Ed, I am willing and able to test the exhaust systems. I have also ordered a Porsche System Tester 2 to assist with my diagnosis during testing. Thanks for the kind words, and I will keep all informed of my data aquisition.
__________________
Bisimoto Engineering
2001 modified Boxster S, slate grey, red interior
|
|
|
02-28-2007, 07:56 AM
|
#77
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bisimoto
I have also ordered a Porsche System Tester 2 to assist with my diagnosis during testing.
|
Holy crap! You've got some deep pockets there, friend! Aren't those suckers something like $3-4k or more?
|
|
|
02-28-2007, 08:09 AM
|
#78
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hacienda Heights, Ca
Posts: 75
|
Forgive me for not being clear: I ordered a PST from Durametric for $630. I wish I had DEEP pockets..lol.
__________________
Bisimoto Engineering
2001 modified Boxster S, slate grey, red interior
|
|
|
02-28-2007, 08:51 AM
|
#79
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,889
|
For what it is worth, here is info on the 987/Cayman.
http://www.pca.org/tech/tech_qa_question.asp?id={24041683-6376-4DD9-80EC-3A5F748391BF}
If the link does not work I think you have to copy and paste.
Last edited by Tool Pants; 02-28-2007 at 08:55 AM.
|
|
|
03-03-2007, 06:58 AM
|
#80
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: NYC area
Posts: 681
|
OK, now I am REALLY doing this today!
If my friend ever stops sleeping, damn it :\
__________________
Miss my Boxster
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:16 AM.
| |