11-01-2018, 08:46 AM
|
#1
|
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BYprodriver
It is a tiny oil passage at the top of the head. When you pull the green plugs you should be able to see the end of a camshaft, they are tubular& sealed with a 1/4" expansion plug. Make sure that plug is intact. If that head oil passage way is blocked the pressure can blowout the cam plug. Edit, just realized Quadcammer already posted half of what I stated.
|
Hmmmm..... this is good info.
Couple questions:
1. is the green cam plug the same plug used on the OTHER end of the intake cam? The missing plug is the one above the scavenge pump on the left side. I don't see more than one cam plug listed on pelican.
2. Are you suggesting that this is a wet plug? That if it's removed there would be oil leaking? Because there is no sign of oil around the crooked plugs, nor is there any sign of it around the hole that seems to be missing the plug altogether.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
|
|
|
11-01-2018, 08:01 AM
|
#2
|
|
Multi-Boxer Driver
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Orange Park, FL
Posts: 1,430
|
For what it's worth, when the AOS on my mom's '06 987 failed it wouldn't allow a restart, and also had oil in the intake, exhaust, and cylinders. That's been three years ago now, and aside from a thorough cleaning and a new AOS, it's been fine.
__________________
-Chris
2004 Porsche Boxster 2.7 (gone  )
2004 Porsche 911 C4S Cab
1991 Porsche 911 C2 Targa 3.6
2017 Subaru Outback 3.6R
|
|
|
11-03-2018, 02:28 PM
|
#3
|
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
So, help?
What should be plugging this? (This is the front end of the left side intake cam.) And what would cause it to go missing? 
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 04:14 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Chatham, Ontario
Posts: 5
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maytag
So, help?
What should be plugging this? (This is the front end of the left side intake cam.) And what would cause it to go missing?
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
|
Significant (air) pressure built up in the crankcase somehow, and popped them out. It May have happened when the AOS was temporarily full of oil during your track spin. The AOS is supposed to create a vacuum in the crankcase using the vacuum available from the intake manifold. If for reason it couldn’t do that momentarily, blowby gasses May build up enough to pressurize the crankcase.
Put the cam plugs back in, and if your missing a cam plug, it’s probably at the track somewhere..
Once all of the cam plugs are back in, in theory you shouldn’t have any more big air leaks into the crankcase. Once you put in the new AOS, the car should run better (probably runs rough right now because it’s sucking way more crankcase air than it should due to:
1) the diaphram in the AOS is probably punctured or ripped, which means it won’t be able to regulate the vacuuum it’s supposed to maintain in the crankcase. The diaphram uses differential air pressure (vacuums, in this case), to function, and with a punctured diaphram, the diaphram will leak pressure to the other side.
2) cam plugs not being in - which will leak lots of air into the crankcase, just like opening the oil cap when the car is running, it will make the engine run poorly.. the AOS’s regulator would open up as much as it can to try to achieve a low vacuum level inside the crankcase, but it won’t be able to achieve it - because too much air is leaking into the engine from the hole (cam plug missing or not seated, or if the oil cap is off). With the regulator fully open, a very large amount of air will be flowing from the crankcase, through the AOS, and into the intake manifold. It enters the engine after the mass air flow sensor, so the engine won’t know about how large the vacuum leak is. It would try to adjust using feedback from o2 sensors (but only once they are fully warmed up), otherwise they’ll be ignored when the engine is cold, and the computer will have no idea it’s sucking in way too much air for the amount of fuel it knows it should have to put in.
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 02:03 PM
|
#5
|
|
Certified Boxster Addict
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maytag
2) ... any PCV system that includes such an easy path for the oil to dump into the intake, such as we have with this AOS system, seems like a design-failure. For decades, we've been dumping PCV into catch-cans which then vent to atmosphere, or to header-pipes, and drain back to the sump.
Why don't we simply do that with these motors? What am I missing?
|
These days, venting crankcase/oil vapors to the atmosphere is a no-no in terms of system design for emissions compliance. Could you implement a catch-can approach? Yes. But it depends on how you feel about defeating pollution controls and how closely Utah monitors emissions compliance.
Quote:
Originally Posted by maytag
Is there a better design on the market already?
|
Yes, Porsche has a motorsports AOS that eliminates most of the design flaws of the Boxster production AOS. The part itself is $750 and you'll need some mods to make it work.
Porsche Motorsports AOS
Quote:
Originally Posted by maytag
What are y'all racers doing?
|
Because of the high cost of the motorsports component and the cheap cost of the production unit ($75), most Boxster racers run the production component and simply change whenever needed (many racers do it at the track between sessions if they see a cloud of smoke).
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
Last edited by thstone; 11-04-2018 at 02:08 PM.
|
|
|
11-04-2018, 05:27 PM
|
#6
|
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by thstone
These days, venting crankcase/oil vapors to the atmosphere is a no-no in terms of system design for emissions compliance. Could you implement a catch-can approach? Yes. But it depends on how you feel about defeating pollution controls and how closely Utah monitors emissions compliance.
Yes, Porsche has a motorsports AOS that eliminates most of the design flaws of the Boxster production AOS. The part itself is $750 and you'll need some mods to make it work.
Porsche Motorsports AOS
Because of the high cost of the motorsports component and the cheap cost of the production unit ($75), most Boxster racers run the production component and simply change whenever needed (many racers do it at the track between sessions if they see a cloud of smoke).
|
Yeah..... I guess that all makes sense. Sure seems like there's a void in the aftermarket, if there isn't a better solution yet. Im'a look at adding in a reservoir, in-line, with some sort of overflow that dumps someplace other than INDUCTION.
Sounds nice.... but probably i'll do exactly as the rest of you do.... haha.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
|
|
|
11-05-2018, 04:14 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Chatham, Ontario
Posts: 5
|
I wish the carrera’s AOS was as easy to replace as it is for the Boxsters..
In my Canadian province, emission tests consists of just plugging into the OBDII port, and looking at warnings and how many of the sensors are at their ready state. I highly doubt an oil catch can will caught. Besides, it could be designed to be easily removable. I think it’s good “insurance” , to at least reduce the amount of oil ingested and mitigate damage.
There is currently no backup in our AOS system, as it stands now. It would have to be checked regularly though, because if it’s ignored and there’s an issue, it won’t help if it’s basically full of oil already.
If I create a kickstarter campaign, would there be serious interest? I’m a mechanical engineer (for better or worse), and have access to CFD software, if it’s needed. If so, PM me, with your email address, and your car year and model. If I get enough interest I’ll put a kit together.
Alternatively, if you are going to seriously fit one, please say so, actually follow through, and follow up with photos and test results. I don’t want to do it if you are going to do it.
I’m sick of not having a solution for this.
|
|
|
12-03-2018, 12:51 PM
|
#8
|
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
|
|
|
12-03-2018, 01:24 PM
|
#9
|
|
Racer Boy
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 946
|
Hmm, that's interesting. I wonder if anyone has tried it on their Boxster yet. For years these kind of catch cans were used in racing cars, but I don't know how they would work with an engine like our flat-6s that have more extreme challenges than most engine configurations in regards to venting the crankcase.
It's cheaper than an AOS. Who is willing to try one first?
|
|
|
12-03-2018, 01:47 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,151
|
does the crankcase need to be under vacuum or just vented?
|
|
|
12-03-2018, 02:43 PM
|
#11
|
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King
does the crankcase need to be under vacuum or just vented?
|
My understanding of this was that it's still under vacuum. That's what I got from the installation instructions.
I think the vacuum is important.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
|
|
|
12-03-2018, 07:38 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,998
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King
does the crankcase need to be under vacuum or just vented?
|
I believe the design of the low friction piston rings requires the crankcase vacuum to seal properly.
.
Last edited by Gilles; 12-03-2018 at 07:42 PM.
|
|
|
12-04-2018, 07:53 AM
|
#13
|
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
Can anyone tell me what size (diameter) hose connects the Throttle-Body to the AOS?
I'm going to experiment with a small catch-can plumbed-in there, to catch any/all oil that gets past the AOS, give it a place to condense the vapors and then catch & contain what remains. My hope is that I can end the small smoke-bombs that plague me at the track. Despite how common they are on Boxsters, I keep getting black-flagged for them, and I need them to go away.
It seems to me that as long as this added catch-can & associated connections remain air-tight, then the added volume to the system is probably unimportant. (any disagreements?)
Any reasons you can think of that this won't work?
|
|
|
12-04-2018, 10:23 AM
|
#14
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 1,998
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maytag
Can anyone tell me what size (diameter) hose connects the Throttle-Body to the AOS?
|
Maytag, the AOS has two main accordion hoses, one connects to the T tube where the throttle body attaches to, and the other one goes to a breather valve on top of the block behind the driver seat (4-6 bank)
I replaced them once on my 987 and the by the type of the connectors I don't thing that would be very easy to do unless you modify the way the hoses connect with the entire AOS breather system.
Out of curiosity, why don't you just but two new accordion hoses and replace the old ones? You would be back in business in no time (IMHO)..
.
|
|
|
12-04-2018, 10:36 AM
|
#15
|
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gilles
Out of curiosity, why don't you just but two new accordion hoses and replace the old ones? You would be back in business in no time (IMHO)..
.
|
Thanks Gilles. I don't think this accomplishes anything for me. I have no reason to suspect my "accordion hoses" are bad, in any way.
What I'm trying to do is eliminate the smoke-bombs which plague Boxster owners at the track, by installing a catch-can after the AOS and before the TB. This would (I'm postulating here) catch whatever amount of liquid oil momentarily overwhelms the AOS.
|
|
|
01-12-2019, 04:45 PM
|
#16
|
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
Well, I tried a couple of versions of a catch can, and so far I'm not happy with any. There's not enough space in there for anything of any real volume.
I've seen a couple of installations where they plumbed the catch can to the trunk, but this being a street car, I didn't want to get that crazy.
So....
I put in a loop of clear, wire reinforced hose. Hopefully this will allow me to see what's going on, and hopefully there's enough volume in that loop to catch the oil, instead of making smoke bombs. And I can just remove it and drain it, until I come up with a better plan.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
|
|
|
09-18-2020, 11:56 AM
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 375
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maytag
Well, I tried a couple of versions of a catch can, and so far I'm not happy with any. There's not enough space in there for anything of any real volume.
I've seen a couple of installations where they plumbed the catch can to the trunk, but this being a street car, I didn't want to get that crazy.
So....
I put in a loop of clear, wire reinforced hose. Hopefully this will allow me to see what's going on, and hopefully there's enough volume in that loop to catch the oil, instead of making smoke bombs. And I can just remove it and drain it, until I come up with a better plan.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

|
So, how did that work out? Tell us! :dance:
|
|
|
09-18-2020, 02:16 PM
|
#18
|
|
Who's askin'?
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,448
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert986
So, how did that work out? Tell us! :dance:
|
So far so good. No more smoke bombs. I've had to drain it after each track-day, and yes, it always has some accumulated oil in it, which would presumably have otherwise been in the intake.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
|
|
|
09-18-2020, 03:01 PM
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 375
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by maytag
So far so good. No more smoke bombs. I've had to drain it after each track-day, and yes, it always has some accumulated oil in it, which would presumably have otherwise been in the intake.
Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
|
Brilliant, I might copy this!
Did anyone actually put a catch can in the trunk, connected between AOS & plenum inlet? Any reason that wouldnt work?
|
|
|
09-18-2020, 03:21 PM
|
#20
|
|
1998 Boxster Silver/Red
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: 92262
Posts: 3,095
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert986
Brilliant, I might copy this!
Did anyone actually put a catch can in the trunk, connected between AOS & plenum inlet? Any reason that wouldnt work?
|
A lot have done that... and it's been covered on this forum... so you'll find good information if you go that route.
It would seem Maytag did his research on the cannisters... and if you considering going the trunk route, it'd be his brain you'd want to pick.
He's not little brains.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKIp6CTliL4
__________________
1998 Porsche Boxster
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 AM.
| |