![]() |
Old subject, but.. What about 987 headers, would oem 987 headers fit? Would 987 equal length aftermarket headers be even better than the cheap 986 equal length headers?
I know I always have a lot of questions, but soon I hope to be providing answers also :-) The thing is that I really plan to do "the big bang" with intake, exhaust and custom tune.. I want to understand it all before I start. The roadmap looks like this: 1) ASAP: Headers, I´m a bit afraid that the bolts are totally rusted/stuck and needs to be drilled out, you know.. So I will adress this first, while the car is still running so I can take it to a pro garage if I get stuck. 2) Midpipes with 200cel cats, when the headers are in place I do this. 3) During winter: Hope to be able to build my own "end system/cat back" I have some fun ideas I can´t wait to try out. During the winter I also plan to do the whole intake part, airbag, MAF, throttle, plenum 996 intake. 4 Springtime: Time for a custom tune and possible get some figures from the dyno. So.. This is why I´, all over the forum and asking things about intake AND exhaust.. bear with me.. |
Quote:
987 exhaust manifolds will bolt-on to the engine but it will require custom pipes to be fabricated to the muffler. I have a set of 987 Fabspeed manifolds with cats that I bought to install on my Box S but recently got a set of 986 Fabspeed manifolds & cat delete pipes for a good deal I am installing instead. I will be selling the 987 Fabspeed manifolds soon. |
Bang for buck the eBay stuff is fine. I've used the eBay manifolds again on my 2nd 986. The latest configuration is with 200cell cats and Carnewal. I did plenty of Dyno runs on my previous car. You can spend plenty more on Cargraphic, FVD etc but will you really get that much more. Ditto the IPD kit. For a fraction of the price you can get the 996 throttle body and plenum and a couple of jubilee clips and silicone tube and you're done for very little outlay. Been there done that and would do it again the same way. My remap was a half day on the Dyno and cost me £350 back in 2013.
|
Generally speaking installing most catless headers will decrease low RPM torque which is what gets the car moving & the headers increase power at high rpm. That's why I sold my headers & bought Fabspeed sport cat manifolds for my 3.6 litre.
|
In Europe the OE headers are already catless. We only have the cats in the mid section. They're normally 400cell but most 'sport' cats are 200 or 100 cell. I've tried lots of permutations of exhaust set up on the 550 I now have but haven't bothered to Dyno test any as I did all that on my previous Boxster.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
BYP, correct me if I'm wrong. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Do you drive your Boxster on the street at redline all the time, or do you use the entire rev range? Personally, I rarely ever go near redline when driving on the street in my car.
What BY is saying is that you want headers that will work over the expected rev range. Most people aren't flogging their cars at redline on the street, so the headers should be tuned to work well from 2K to 7K. You can tune an exhaust to make maximum power at redline, but then the car won't have much torque and will be a dog to drive in a normal manner. |
I think that best flow at 3k RPM is probably just about right. The last long trip I had in my S involved almost 15 hours at a bit over 3k RPM in 6th gear. I averaged almost 29 mpg, even with the top down most of the way. Not bad IMO considering the speed.
|
I typed a very long reply to this yesterday.... but the internet God's saved you all from it, by it disappearing before I could post it. :mad:
Most people, when "tuning" (or modifying) a car for street use, look to get as much area "under the line" as possible. Think about a HP line on a graph, say from a dyno-run. You want to get that line as high as possible across the entire range, not simply shoot for a high peak hp. What's being suggested here, is that for street use, a 5% increase beginning at 3000rpm and moving up from there is worth more than a 10% increase at 7000rpm. Now certainly YMMV, depending on your own driving habits, and what the streets in your neighborhood look like. :D And while we're at it; I'm sure BYP understands that talking only about diameter of the primary tube is like talking about a fraction with only a numerator, haha. The length of the primary and shape of the collector are part of that equation as well. It's amazing how much tuning can really happen with a header, though those benefits are rarely realized by a simple header change alone; the header shape should be part of the entire engine design from the start. (I'm sure that's why he suggested to the OP that he should refer to the engine builder for a recommendation) I've built several headers over the years, from very high-revving in-line 4 cylinders, to big-inch V8's, to air-cooled-twin motorcycles..... etc etc. It's more art than science, when you suck at math like I do. hahaha. |
Quote:
I certainly don't want to get into an online row but there seems to be an awful lot of work done to that car just to potter around. Like I say maybe it is just different driving styles and priorities, the idea that was put forward was so alien to the way we use our cars I thought it might be a typo |
Hmmm are we saying cat less headers reduce low end torque. Don’t want anymore of that as my car is all street now. I had thought those and mid cats along the stock can was best in most regimes.
I was planning on creating an catless header experience thread so that performance, price, fit and finish could all be compiled. I would not have considered FabS catted headers to be superior to the above set up especially when considering the price |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:10 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website