986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners (http://986forum.com/forums/)
-   Performance and Technical Chat (http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/)
-   -   which ims bearing upgrade (http://986forum.com/forums/performance-technical-chat/59365-ims-bearing-upgrade.html)

Jamesp 11-04-2015 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ppbon (Post 472343)
… and we can clearly see that you lack it, Jamesp.
You claim to have "discovered" how the IMS fails and you show as proof a video you published on YouTube 10/01/13. www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzHwWUgU37k. (As of today, watched by 1,650 people).
Why don't you check the one I published on YouTube as well on 09/04/13?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hzUq2DFpeKw. (As of today, watched by 36,639 people).
Mine was online ONE MONTH BEFORE YOURS!
I had never seen your video until this morning, yet you say I stole from you.
I think you have it all backwards, Jamesp.
Happy whatever,
Pedro

Pedro, I published that data on this forum long before I made the video. Only a month? What took you so long? I had to edit this after watching your long winded 18 minute video. The closest you get to engine heat induced pressure changes causing oil to be forced through the bearing is that you note something everyone on this forum knows, oil gets into the IMS shaft. Your rationale is it's because the IMS is sitting in oil. Period. You were as lost then as you are now. So now you've been caught twice with your hand in the cookie jar. Don't you learn? You steal my ideas and I'll call you out. One more item, your post above appears crafted to mislead everyone on the forum. That speaks volumes.

Luv2Box 11-04-2015 02:23 PM

Nothing like an IMS issue to start all out war here. Almost as bad as oiled cone filters in after market Cold Air Intakes, which tires are best, what oil and gasoline to use and do after market exhaust systems really add performance. :ah:

papasmurf 11-04-2015 03:36 PM

You really think that Pedro just trolls this board all the time
 
looking for info to steal? I come here almost daily and probably spend no more than 10 minutes at a time reading two or three threads at most that may interest me. Every time someone asks a general IMS question like this, all the "egos" come out of the woodwork and it devolves to this.

Jamesp 11-04-2015 03:39 PM

It's simple. If you use someone's idea, credit them. My mind and my time are my merchandise (credit goes to Bar and Grill singers "Billing time". link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FFVtkpsWCn4 ). See? It's easy. ;)

particlewave 11-04-2015 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by papasmurf (Post 472387)
You really think that Pedro just trolls this board all the time

Well, he showed up as soon as his name was mentioned, so it seems like a possibility! ;)

papasmurf 11-04-2015 05:29 PM

Maybe true...maybe coincidence...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by particlewave (Post 472395)
Well, he showed up as soon as his name was mentioned, so it seems like a possibility! ;)

He wasn't the only one.

tommy583 11-04-2015 05:57 PM

This guy explains the IMS failure better than anyone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1lLWRPzdNA

Jake Raby 11-04-2015 06:10 PM

Speaking of stealing, about 1/2 those photos in that youtube video were ours!

I swear that I wrote part of what he scripted out, too..

boxster 11-04-2015 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake Raby (Post 472360)
Nope, we sell nothing here. I don't even have a way to sell an item, if you go to my site and click parts, you hit a dead end. We are developers, builders, and installers, not parts sales people.

The components do go through a distribution network, and will be available worldwide sometime mid 2016.





Its funny how all that happened, isn't it... More than ironic, if you ask me.

I'm not sure what to do now, if I should wait till then or just do the retrofit now. I never thought id start such a thread,I was just looking for a straight answer regarding the best possible ims bearings available,but I guess there's no such thing as a straight answer when it comes to the dreaded IMS bearing ��

Smallblock454 11-05-2015 02:14 AM

@ boxster:

Well, i think it's a common, human problem. If you ask 10 people you'll get 10 opinions.

Personally i respect all the 10 poeple for their knowledge, but than i do my own research, look for facts and try to form my own opinion.

First step is to understand why the Porsche OEM solution might fail. Than you should do a research what solutions are out there and why poeple think their solution is best, what maintenance is requested, are there any guaranties that are really can be callled guaranties. How often were the after market products sold, how often did they fail, or are there any other problems… and so on.

And than there is the time consuming part. Research for facts. Research on bearing types, reseach on high quality bearing manufacturers, coatings, quality levels, how to replace things best, research on engineering solutions for the problem. Talking with engine developers, engine engineers, mechanics.

All hard facts about the OEM bearings (dimensions, type, rpm) can be found in this forum.

In the end you might have your own opinion.

Maybe this is not the answer you have asked for, but this was my way after getting stucked besides an IMS bearing war - we also had that in the german Porsche forums.

Regards from Germany
Markus

Col986 11-05-2015 02:14 AM

I did the LN retrofit on my car this year. For sure the IMS Solution is the best fix, but also costs more. From what I've read, the retrofit failure rate is way less than 0.1%. On a 12 year old car I'm happy with those odds and think other failures are now more likely. My original non ceramic bearing lasted 12 years, hope to get the same or more out of the LN bearing.

Jake if you're reading, why is there a time limit on the retrofit, my car is a bit of a garage queen doing only 5000km/yr. I have your oil filter adapter & magnetic sump plug fitted, I also have a FilterMag installed & change the oil each 9 months with DT40. (I know you recommend 6 monthly, but I compromised between my normal 12 months). Seems to me under these conditions my new ceramic bearing should outlive the original?

boxster 11-05-2015 02:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Smallblock454 (Post 472419)
@ boxster:

Well, i think it's a common, human problem. If you ask 10 people you'll get 10 opinions.

Personally i respect all the 10 poeple for their knowledge, but than i do my own research, look for facts and try to form my own opinion.

First step is to understand why the Porsche OEM solution might fail. Than you should do a research what solutions are out there and why poeple think their solution is best, what maintenance is requested, are there any guaranties that are really can be callled guaranties. How often were the after market products sold, how often did they fail, or are there any other problems… and so on.

And than there is the time consuming part. Research for facts. Research on bearing types, reseach on high quality bearing manufacturers, coatings, quality levels, how to replace things best, research on engineering solutions for the problem. Talking with engine developers, engine engineers, mechanics.

All hard facts about the OEM bearings (dimensions, type, rpm) can be found in this forum.

In the end you might have your own opinion.

Maybe this is not the answer you have asked for, but this was my way after getting stucked besides an IMS bearing war - we also had that in the german Porsche forums.

Regards from Germany
Markus

I totally understand and appreciate your opinion. I know that everyone thinks his invention is best, and obviously I dont blame them, but as you said, experience and r&d are very important in this field. I now read that injectors must be at their optimum as not to contaminate the oil with fuel, which reduce life of bearings. I'm wondering if its worth taking the injectors out to clean them now!

boxster 11-05-2015 02:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Col986 (Post 472420)
I did the LN retrofit on my car this year. For sure the IMS Solution is the best fix, but also costs more. From what I've read, the retrofit failure rate is way less than 0.1%. On a 12 year old car I'm happy with those odds and think other failures are now more likely. My original non ceramic bearing lasted 12 years, hope to get the same or more out of the LN bearing.

Jake if you're reading, why is there a time limit on the retrofit, my car is a bit of a garage queen doing only 5000km/yr. I have your oil filter adapter & magnetic sump plug fitted, I also have a FilterMag installed & change the oil each 9 months with DT40. (I know you recommend 6 monthly, but I compromised between my normal 12 months). Seems to me under these conditions my new ceramic bearing should outlive the original?

Thats exactly what I was thinking. If after the recommended dual row bearing swap at 6 years, I would have done 20000 miles on the bearings,will they still need to be changed?

Jake Raby 11-05-2015 06:36 AM

All ball & bearings have a time in service rating from their manufacturer. You have to look hard to find these in most instances.

The reason why time matters, even if the car is not driven, is because people tend to service cars that sit static LESS than those that are driven daily. The cars that sit need twice as frequent oil services based on my direct experience, having collected oil samples from hundreds of engines over the last 10-12 years. Some of these case studies were from my Canadian customers who store the car 1/2- 3/4 of the year.

NOT driving the car continues to be the WORST operating environment that it can be exposed to.

tommy583 11-05-2015 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake Raby (Post 472404)
Speaking of stealing, about 1/2 those photos in that youtube video were ours!

I swear that I wrote part of what he scripted out, too..

Yes I agree Jake. That's kinda why I posted it. I only found it because youtube had it on the side of the Pedro video that I watched.

Xcellr8 11-05-2015 10:29 AM

IMS seal or plug
 
Hi all,
The timing of this thread was perfect for me as I just pulled an IMSB from a 2002 3.2. The bearing had failed to the point where heat from the failed bearing had "smeared" the metal behind it. Since it was toast, and because of this discussion, I decided to pull the seal/plug out of the IMS. Based on Pedro's video, I expected to find rancid oil, but low and behold it was clean. Totally clean. No oil. Have there been different seals/plugs to the shaft? This one appeared to be two pieces, a steel sleeve with a steel plug pressed into the end of the shaft.

So, perhaps gas leaked out of the shaft, but oil was not drawn in to the shaft.

As an aside, though this motor is toast, for future service, is it a good idea to pull that seal/plug to learn if the shaft is clean? That would require that the seal/plug for the IMS be available from the dealer. Anyone know?

Thanks,
Joe

dxterity 11-05-2015 10:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boxster (Post 472279)
as i stated before,I dont use the car much, and since statistically those are the type of cars that suffer the most,will LN's bearings have the same problems with cars that dont get used much? They say they life their bearings at 75000 miles or 6 years, since I don't use the car much, if after 6 years the bearings will have 20000 miles on them, will they still have to be changed?

I just bought a '99 in August and immediately took it to a certified Porsche mechanic in Toronto and had the IMS done. He also said that it's now good for 6 years. He also put a stamp under the drivers door stating the date the IMS was done (apparently this is something that S/B done whenever any IMS is done). I asked him if the IMS replacement was related to time or km driven and he said time, regardless of how many km were driven.

Gelbster 11-05-2015 11:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xcellr8 (Post 472447)
Hi all,
The timing of this thread was perfect for me as I just pulled an IMSB from a 2002 3.2. The bearing had failed to the point where heat from the failed bearing had "smeared" the metal behind it. Since it was toast, and because of this discussion, I decided to pull the seal/plug out of the IMS. Based on Pedro's video, I expected to find rancid oil, but low and behold it was clean. Totally clean. No oil. Have there been different seals/plugs to the shaft? This one appeared to be two pieces, a steel sleeve with a steel plug pressed into the end of the shaft.

So, perhaps gas leaked out of the shaft, but oil was not drawn in to the shaft.

As an aside, though this motor is toast, for future service, is it a good idea to pull that seal/plug to learn if the shaft is clean? That would require that the seal/plug for the IMS be available from the dealer. Anyone know?

Thanks,
Joe

"gas leaked out". Do you mean "air" ?
More important - was there any trace of grease in the ball race? I guess not.That is the problem. Grease has 3 main components oil,saponifier and filler/snake oil. So the heat(?) caused seal failure+separation and the liquid fraction leaked out.There may be a only a solid 'crud' remaining?
Why do you think the motor is "toast" ?If the IMSB did not disintegrate and their is no collateral damage ,maybe it can be rescued?

JFP in PA 11-05-2015 11:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gelbster (Post 472451)
Why do you think the motor is "toast" ?If the IMSB did not disintegrate and their is no collateral damage ,maybe it can be rescued?

I seriously doubt it; I have never seen an engine that showed any signs of an IMS bearing failure that did not have metal everywhere in it.

boxster 11-05-2015 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dxterity (Post 472448)
I just bought a '99 in August and immediately took it to a certified Porsche mechanic in Toronto and had the IMS done. He also said that it's now good for 6 years. He also put a stamp under the drivers door stating the date the IMS was done (apparently this is something that S/B done whenever any IMS is done). I asked him if the IMS replacement was related to time or km driven and he said time, regardless of how many km were driven.

Yep, thats what I'm thinking as well, that no matter the miles,since its now considered to be a service part, you have to change it every six years (for dual row)

Gelbster 11-05-2015 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JFP in PA (Post 472455)
I seriously doubt it; I have never seen an engine that showed any signs of an IMS bearing failure that did not have metal everywhere in it.

I am guessing but I think what JFP wisely means is that if there is any metal missing from the IMSB - it is 'toast'. In which case I agree. Perhaps I misunderstood the 'smearing' description of the race and thought that no metal had separated ?
I had a similar issue and just dismantled the entire engine ,repaired/rebuilt it and we'll see how long it lasts....I was lucky that the collateral damage was minimal.

Xcellr8 11-05-2015 06:31 PM

Okay, but how about the plug
 
The bearing had come apart and the filter was production based, so yes, I'm sure metal is everywhere, thus, its toast. But the question was, "is removing the plug to investigate the interior of the shaft a good idea?" Clearly, it would only be a good idea if the bearing failure is caught before becoming catastrophic (no reason to investigate further if rebuild is inevitable), even then however, only if the plug is "serviceable", i.e. a replacement is readily available. Is it?

Jake Raby 11-05-2015 06:42 PM

Even if a failure progresses to stage 3 (bearing stays intact, just tons of debris) the engine is toast. You'll never remove all the debris, and no oil filter is good enough to catch enough of it at those quantities.

If it has gone that far, please use a competitors product, and when it fails make sure that you are very vocal about the fact that their part blew up!

Gelbster 11-05-2015 06:47 PM

Here is a parts diagram -tell us which part number you are calling a "plug".
M96.20 Camshaft M96.21/22 Driving Mechanism M96.23/24
or:
http://www.pelicanparts.com/techarticles/Boxster_Tech/14-ENGINE-Intermediate_Shaft_Bearing/images_small/Pic019.jpg
Reluctantly I did what Jake asked. Mine had an LN ceramic IMSB that had less than 1000 miles on it when #6 c/s bearing was damaged.No fault of the LN part.

Jake Raby 11-05-2015 07:19 PM

Some people say "the debris was really small, its not a problem".

well, let me tell you, if you think that, you'll learn fast. the smaller the debris the WORSE it is! The heavy stuff sits at the bottom of the sump, it doesn't splash all around inside the engine as it is suspended in the oil.

I'll take chunks any day over the small, fine stuff, thats microscopic in size.

If the bearing begins to fail, unless its caught at Stage 2, or prior, take the whole damn engine apart. Do it now.

Xcellr8 11-06-2015 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gelbster (Post 472500)
Here is a parts diagram -tell us which part number you are calling a "plug".
M96.20 Camshaft M96.21/22 Driving Mechanism M96.23/24
or:
http://www.pelicanparts.com/techarticles/Boxster_Tech/14-ENGINE-Intermediate_Shaft_Bearing/images_small/Pic019.jpg
Reluctantly I did what Jake asked. Mine had an LN ceramic IMSB that had less than 1000 miles on it when #6 c/s bearing was damaged.No fault of the LN part.

Thanks for the parts diagram, but I do not see the "plug" in the diagram, nor is it included in the Pelican's parts photo. Attached are a few photos of the plug I pulled. The photos show what you would see if you were inside the intermediate shaft looking out towards the shaft bearing. You are seeing the back of the "plug" which is pressed inside a steel sleeve, which is pressed into the bearing end of the shaft before the bearing, thus "sealing" the hollow shaft from the bearing.

Now, most of the destruction on the other end was caused by my welding a nut to the sleeve to use a slide hammer puller to get the plug out of the shaft.
http://986forum.com/forums/uploads01/0011446820776.jpg
http://986forum.com/forums/uploads01/0021446820826.jpg
http://986forum.com/forums/uploads01/0031446820958.jpg

Jake Raby 11-06-2015 06:08 AM

That plug isn't from the factory. The center portion appears to be a metric expansion plug.

Factory IMS shafts are not plugged, which is why we have to supply a specially manufactured plug with the IMS Solution.

Gelbster 11-06-2015 06:55 AM

Xcell,
Aren't you glad I asked about the plug a.k.a. Freeze plug?
Looks like an 'interesting' previous diy job. How much damage has been done to the IMS tube? Reuseable?
If you need a replacement plug,try here:
Freeze Plug Size Chart « freezeplugfactory.com

Xcellr8 11-06-2015 07:55 AM

Thank you
 
Thanks, Jake and Gelbster for staying with me long enough to figure out what this was. I appreciate the information.

It now appears to me that this failure is just what Jake has warned against. On this car it appears that the original IMSB failed and during replacement, the plug was installed. We don't know what caused the second bearing to fail, but it wasn't because of rancid oil in the shaft, the plug did it job there. So we can only guess that the second bearing most likely failed from debris left behind from the first failure.

Now the question becomes, should we all be using a plug when replacing an IMSB that hasn't failed as a preventive measure?

Thanks again,
Live, read, and learn,
Joe

Gelbster 11-06-2015 08:02 AM

Posts like #109 are very helpful and need to be cited in future when we read of people just slapping in a replacement IMSB and flipping the car.
There are lots of draconian directives and pre failure directives published by some vendors.Now we have an example(perhaps) of why they are so insistent of specific conditions before they will warranty an IMSB replacement .
Pre-failure Directives
My car failed less than 1000 miles after an IMSB replacement by the P.O..
The freeze plug :
what if you distort the thin-wall IMS tube during insertion? Pin it & bearing+Loctite sufficient?
what if it becomes loose
Drill a small vent hole in it?
Which type of freeze plug and why? Many different types in the link I posted #108 .Cup style in s/s ,I presume?
Here is some Melling info on deep cups:
http://www.melling.com/Portals/0/Size%20Charts/Expansion%20Plug%20Dimensional%20Listing.pdf

JFP in PA 11-06-2015 08:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gelbster (Post 472544)
Posts like #109 are very helpful and need to be cited in future when we read of people just slapping in a replacement IMSB and flipping the car.
There are lots of draconian directives and pre failure directives published by some vendors.Now we have an example(perhaps) of why they are so insistent of specific conditions before they will warranty an IMSB replacement .
Pre-failure Directives
My car failed less than 1000 miles after an IMSB replacement by the P.O..
The freeze plug :
what if you distort the thin-wall IMS tube during insertion? Pin it & bearing+Loctite sufficient?
what if it becomes loose
Drill a small vent hole in it?
Which type of freeze plug and why? Many different types in the link I posted #108 .Cup style in s/s ,I presume?
Here is some Melling info on deep cups:
http://www.melling.com/Portals/0/Size%20Charts/Expansion%20Plug%20Dimensional%20Listing.pdf

The freeze plug is not a standard size to my knowledge, which is probably why Jake has his made for him. We took one we had on hand (cup style) and turned it down on a lathe. I do not remember the dimensions off hand, but if you have a shaft lying around you can "mike" it and figure what would be needed for an interference fit without ballooning the shaft. If memory serves, we used Loctite 37485 slip fit bearing mount adhesive to lock it in place and seal it.

Drilling a hole in it would be counter productive to sealing off the shaft from oil intrusion.

Smallblock454 11-06-2015 08:38 AM

@ Gelbster:

As we know there can go a lot wrong when installing or deinstalling a roller bearing.

Plug: http://986forum.com/forums/472269-post57.html I definetly go with a machined tube style made of a soft aluminium alloy, because it can't twist and will expand more to seal. Also a soft metal won't hurt the IMS tube.

No holes. You'll have overpressure in the IMS tube. The tube was designed for that, because of the sealed OEM bearing.

Regards
Markus

Gelbster 11-06-2015 08:41 AM

JFP,
Very helpful,thank you.Your experience is more valuable than my pontificating :-)
"Drilling a hole in it would be counter productive to sealing off the shaft from oil intrusion."
I was trying to address the concern expressed earlier about pressure changes in the IMS tube. AS Markus says, maybe no longer a concern.
There are brass freeze plugs listed below- easier to modify than steel.
http://freezeplugfactory.com/expansion-plug-size-chart/

JFP in PA 11-06-2015 08:50 AM

The pressure inside the IMS shaft is irrelevant if it is sealed and has no oil in it.

Jake Raby 11-06-2015 10:10 AM

The ONLY reason the bye is sealed with the IMS Solution is because we've seen IMS shaft assemblies loose their press fit, and simply fall apart (MOF#24).

The assembly is made of 4 pieces, if oil pressure, and volume (under pressure)can enter the tube, the possibility exists that a hydraulic event may occur that could assist in the shaft separating.

Plugging the IMS tube eliminates this, as no hydraulic pressure exists within the shaft, and if a shaft disconnects, its simply bad luck.

Now, the technology that uses the IMS tube to transfer oil (via pressure) into the bearing has the possibility of catalyzing this issue, under the right conditions.

The decision to plug the IMS Shaft for the IMS Solution took me 3 years to finally decide on. I ran many engines both ways, and NEVER had an issue. In the end, plugging the shaft was the best possible way to go. Why? Because the IMS shaft has a volume of 2/3 of 1 quart of oil. If the shaft is not plugged, as the engine operates the active oil level drops, and if the oil is checked within a few minutes it always shows low. When this occurs, someone adds oil, and then the next morning the engine is overfilled by 1/2 qt, as the IMS tube has drained back to the sump slowly overnight.

Yes, now you see why I never sleep.

RandallNeighbour 11-06-2015 10:13 AM

Ha! It's all about addressing the potential "what if's" isn't it?

Jake Raby 11-06-2015 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RandallNeighbour (Post 472568)
Ha! It's all about addressing the potential "what if's" isn't it?

They never end....

boxster 11-06-2015 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake Raby (Post 472572)
They never end....

This has turned into such an interesting thread,I learned so much from this already!
So if I fit the retrofit, do you also suggest I plug the ims shaft or will it be ok with an open shaft? Will the engine be starved of oil when the shaft fills with oil?

Jake Raby 11-06-2015 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boxster (Post 472577)
This has turned into such an interesting thread,I learned so much from this already!
So if I fit the retrofit, do you also suggest I plug the ims shaft or will it be ok with an open shaft? Will the engine be starved of oil when the shaft fills with oil?

Unless you are using the IMS Solution, then no plug is required with any other LN Engineering product. Why? Because the bearing has an inner seal that does a great job of keeping ANYTHING out of the IMS tube. Oil, air, gases (insert laughter here) or even smoke, after the engine explodes!

I have extracted many classic single, dual and Single Row Pro LN IMSR bearings and to date oil has NEVER been found inside the tube of an engine fitted with these. Not once, not ever, and that takes into consideration the removal of the very first IMSR bearing at least two dozen times to check it during development.

The IMS Solution is a different story, as it's journal bearing delivered oil into the shaft, and fills it within seconds after start up of the engine, if the plug is not in place.

In short, follow the directives of the manufacturer of what you are using. Don't try to out smart them, as its the quickest way to shoot yourself in the foot. of course, that only pertains to truly developed products, not those that are cobbled together in someone's garage.

boxster 11-06-2015 12:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jake Raby (Post 472579)
Unless you are using the IMS Solution, then no plug is required with any other LN Engineering product. Why? Because the bearing has an inner seal that does a great job of keeping ANYTHING out of the IMS tube. Oil, air, gases (insert laughter here) or even smoke, after the engine explodes!

I have extracted many classic single, dual and Single Row Pro LN IMSR bearings and to date oil has NEVER been found inside the tube of an engine fitted with these. Not once, not ever, and that takes into consideration the removal of the very first IMSR bearing at least two dozen times to check it during development.

The IMS Solution is a different story, as it's journal bearing delivered oil into the shaft, and fills it within seconds after start up of the engine, if the plug is not in place.

In short, follow the directives of the manufacturer of what you are using. Don't try to out smart them, as its the quickest way to shoot yourself in the foot. of course, that only pertains to truly developed products, not those that are cobbled together in someone's garage.

Oh, so if I'm understanding correctly the bearing is only open from the flange side,and it has a seal on the shaft side. So that also eliminates the acidic oil that gets accumulated in the shaft with the original bearing,right?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:32 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website