Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-30-2014, 07:17 PM   #1
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by coreseller View Post
When I performed the install several years back Jake told me to place the sticker on the inside of the driver's door jamb just above the striker bar.


That one was a long time ago, back when we sold IMS bearing kits to the public, not just installing them.

As far as keeping your old bearing:
Doing this means you have no warranty. The reason the old bearing is to be returned is so it can be inspected and entered into a data base reflecting the IMSR serial # that you were issued. This is so LN can ensure that your old bearing was not failing, because if it was, your retrofit bearing will also likely fail, unless extreme measures are taken.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2014, 09:00 PM   #2
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
I did mine in the early days; not sure there was a sticker.....believe it or not dual rows were not good as there was no extraction method!! I don't have a sticker and didn't return the bearing!! This must have program put in place later?

I can remember experienced porsche service personnel saying "don't worry about it unless you are super aggressive with it".
__________________
986 00S
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 08:07 AM   #3
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaykay View Post
I did mine in the early days; not sure there was a sticker.....believe it or not dual rows were not good as there was no extraction method!! I don't have a sticker and didn't return the bearing!! This must have program put in place later?
There has always been an extraction method. I released the extraction procedure BEFORE the very first IMSR kit was sold.

The bearing return policy has always been the same, its part of the return policy and has been since day #1.

Quote:
I can remember experienced porsche service personnel saying "don't worry about it unless you are super aggressive with it".
Yeah, thats back when I was told that the bearing was impossible to extract, and that it wasn't serviceable and that I was lying when I said I had developed the extractor and retrofit procedure.

Yes, those were the days...
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 09:21 AM   #4
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
I was speaking of dual row versus single row extraction. Early on, according my information, there wasn't a known extraction method for the dual. Yes of course there was no kit yet either
__________________
986 00S

Last edited by jaykay; 10-31-2014 at 09:24 AM.
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 07:34 PM   #5
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaykay View Post
I was speaking of dual row versus single row extraction. Early on, according my information, there wasn't a known extraction method for the dual. Yes of course there was no kit yet either
Again, my procedure was the first for the dual row, and the RIMSEXT_01 was also the first extraction tool that was developed, and from day one it was designed to extract the dual row bearing.

The procedure and RIMSEXT_01 extractor tools were both developed before the first IMSR bearings were commercially released to the market.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2014, 10:16 PM   #6
Registered User
 
jaykay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: toronto
Posts: 2,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby View Post
Again, my procedure was the first for the dual row, and the RIMSEXT_01 was also the first extraction tool that was developed, and from day one it was designed to extract the dual row bearing.

The procedure and RIMSEXT_01 extractor tools were both developed before the first IMSR bearings were commercially released to the market.
Yes, Jake that is how / what I have in my car....it is the LN bearing and the LN tooling used. I appreciate the development.

......correct or not I do recall gingerly waiting it out until the dual row kit was available as my model year could have had either. It was early on and one could drop the trans. and be out of luck if a shallow dish flange was staring at you.
__________________
986 00S
jaykay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2014, 05:42 AM   #7
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
Originally Posted by jaykay View Post
Yes, Jake that is how / what I have in my car....it is the LN bearing and the LN tooling used. I appreciate the development.

......correct or not I do recall gingerly waiting it out until the dual row kit was available as my model year could have had either. It was early on and one could drop the trans. and be out of luck if a shallow dish flange was staring at you.
No LN kits were sold until my retrofit procedure was adopted for the dual row.
Prior to this the only IMS component sold was the triple row fitted shaft assembly, requiring engine disassembly for fitment.

The very first LN IMS component was a quadruple bearing fitted shaft assembly, I built the first engine to ever be fitted with an LN bearing, using that shaft. It's still alive.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page