Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 02-19-2006, 10:47 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota, USA
Posts: 3,308
Pete,

I'm always skeptical whenever an AfterMarket Company throws Dyno Testing into the Mix. I mean there's Dyno Testing and then there's Dyno Testing.

One Company's product was tested on a Dyno, and they did get the Readout they wanted for Advertising purposes - they did however leave out the fact that the Engine needed a total rebuild once they were done - but the Truth in Abvertising Guidelines were met.

There are so many variables on a Dyno that a repeatable, verifyable result is frequently unachievable. If they don't publish the Methodology, it's all bunk!

People put Great Faith (read Too Much Faith) in someone else's Dyno results. I just read an article about the Guy from Wisc. who invented the Rolling Dyno. He Tried to market it to AfterMarket manufacturers. At $25k/copy, it was a tough sell. One Major Manufacturer flat out told him, why would I spend $25k, when I can market junk by placing a $5k Ad in a Car Mag and get $50k worth of Sales from it..??

But, the Dyno gain popularity and the Faith of the Average Joe. So today, Dyno Testing has become De Rigeur for anybody with a Fancy, New, Widget. But, there is a wide degree of accuracy in Dyno results, often greater than the increases boasted by the Manufacturer. If say the Super were Free-Wheeling, then that much boost may be attainable, but in real life, I doubt it.

It takes a lot of energy to produce 18PSI of Boost. The impellor needs to be very precise, not to mention the torque and power of the electric motor. These things have great inefficiencies - they do not transfer Energy well due to Mechanical Loss. It is fairly simple Mathermatics - there is only so much usable Work to be derived from 1 Horsepower. Take away Mechanical inefficiencies and a Unit has to draw waay more power than the actual work it's producing. The Blower is not an innovative technology - it is no more efficient than a Blower powered by another means. The Electric Drive Motor isn't innovative - no more powerful than any other, so I'm not convinced.

But, if I ever do find a way to make more from less, I'll have a Car Collection which puts Seinfeld, Leno, and Ralph Lauren to shame...

Happy Motoring!... Jim'99

Last edited by MNBoxster; 02-19-2006 at 10:50 PM.
MNBoxster is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page