12-27-2013, 09:19 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 867
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walter White
"Why not just edit the post to include the pictures??"
If you know how please let me know. I can't find any way to either delete or add photos to a post once it has been posted.
|
Click "Edit;" click "Go Advanced;" edit post and add pictures as needed.
__________________
2000 Boxster S, 6 speed, Sport Package, Litronics, LED tail lights, LNE IMS-B, OBC, Skybreaker wind deflector, Arctic Silver/Graphite Grey
|
|
|
12-27-2013, 09:27 AM
|
#2
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
Carry out these experiments within an engine and you'll see that your observations change.
Over time we have found that not just the strength of the cage matters, but also the weight of the balls and the cage. This is because the inner race is parked and the outer race is rotating, among other things.
Of course, the only real solution to the issue is removing the balls and the cage completely from the equation.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
12-27-2013, 09:55 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 90
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
Over time we have found that not just the strength of the cage matters, but also the weight of the balls and the cage.
|
That is why I haven't tried PEEK or PTFE cages with steel balls. On the other hand, the J and W type cages both have a track record with the OEM steel ball IMS bearing.
__________________
It's all bad
Last edited by Walter White; 12-27-2013 at 10:05 AM.
|
|
|
12-27-2013, 10:17 AM
|
#4
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
Don't limit your possibilities by what you **think** will work. All too often I find the things that prove themselves are either the opposite of what I thought would work or they were never intended to work as explained by others.
Spinning that bearing unloaded really isn't proving much, because the dynamics change with vibrations imposed by the engine and the timing chains as well as the rapid acceleration and deceleration of the engine. There's a reason why lots of IMSBs fail on the track just after someone zings an engine from a missed shift.
Really figuring this out requires sacrificing engines.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
12-27-2013, 11:09 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foster City CA
Posts: 1,099
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
Really figuring this out requires sacrificing engines.
|
Didn't Elton John sing a ballad about Sacrifice?
Last edited by thom4782; 12-27-2013 at 05:12 PM.
|
|
|
12-27-2013, 11:46 AM
|
#6
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
I've sacrificed an engine in less than one minute proving IMS related components and theories. That was a 4,400.00 prototype part inside of an engine that cost 12K to build.
That year we spent over 100K on development, so don't anyone think that you can solve these issues by spinning up an IMS shaft with a dremel tool, or a lathe head.
We are very thrifty doing every single part of the work ourselves from building the engines built with used parts and etc and we still spend a minimum of 50K per year on this stuff, even buying things at wholesale or manufacturing them from scratch. If you want to play you must pay.
Or you just steal someone else's idea, call it your own and advertise the hell out of it until you make a few people believe that it actually works. You'll sell a few but you'll never get the components into circulation, because the distributors won't believe the BS and you won't pass their stringent QC inspections.
True development is part of the game at this level. It takes years and will consume your life.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
12-27-2013, 12:18 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
|
As Carroll Shelby said: "Ok now break the $hit out of it!"
__________________
OE engine rebuilt,3.6 litre LN Engineering billet sleeves,triple row IMSB,LN rods. Deep sump oil pan with DT40 oil.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:46 AM.
| |