Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-19-2013, 07:55 PM   #1
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Quote:
But eventually LN went to a plain bearing with significantly different load characteristics altogether.
LN Engineering didn't...

IMS Solution LLC did. LN doesn't sell the IMS Solution, neither does Flat 6 Innovations.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2013, 05:25 AM   #2
Beginner
 
Jamesp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,659
Garage
Kirk,

Thanks for pointing out the bearing life factor. Do you have independent calcs on IMS bearing life utilizing the 1.2 factor? I'm deciding what to do with my IMSB right now and have not had time to do more than look up the 1.2 factor for rotational arrangement. I'll run the calcs later, but would like to see a second set to verify my work. This may have a big impact bearing selection.
Jamesp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2013, 09:20 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jamesp View Post
Kirk,

Thanks for pointing out the bearing life factor. Do you have independent calcs on IMS bearing life utilizing the 1.2 factor? I'm deciding what to do with my IMSB right now and have not had time to do more than look up the 1.2 factor for rotational arrangement. I'll run the calcs later, but would like to see a second set to verify my work. This may have a big impact bearing selection.
James, I'm not trying to design a new bearing for this application, so I have not run any calculations. I have no interest in providing any competition for LN, IMS Solution, Flat 6, or TuneRS. I am just searching, exploring, discussing, and even arguing about what is the best fix. It's difficult though because there is money involved here and some people are pushing their products with pretty hard sales methods. You have to read what is out there pretty carefully.

For example, IMS Solution has this statement on their website:

"By replacing the factory sealed ball bearing with a pressure fed oil-lubricated plain bearing, the IMS Solution eliminates potential damaged caused by foreign object debris, eliminating 11 wear components from the assembly."


I think this is misleading at best, but more likely deceptive. 11 wear components are eliminated, really? I call baloney on that one in a heartbeat. The bearing is eliminated and the weak shaft that presses into the inner race of the bearing is eliminated. So what are the 11 components then? Well this is an extreme stretch, but I honestly think they are counting the eight individual balls in the bearing as being separate "components", the inner race, the outer race, and then the shaft = 11. When Porsche assembled these engines though they only bought two components from suppliers - the bearing and shaft. Calling that 11 components to try to make the change seem more significant is baloney.

So tread carefully and try to sift through the baloney.

If you want to post your calculations for sizing a bearing, feel free to. I am sure you can get some good feedback. You are limited though simply by what will FIT inside the IMS. If you look at off-the-shelf ceramic bearings be careful about the cage material. Most use a nylon cage. I don't believe the IMS Retrofit does. I believe that is what makes their bearing "custom" is that it probably uses a steel cage or some other metal. I would check the temperature rating for the nylon cages that are standard on ceramic bearings. I don't believe they will hold up in this environment and I believe that is the main factor that stops most folks from just grabbing any old ceramic bearing and selling it as an IMS fix.

Kirk Bristol
__________________
2000 Boxster S - Gemballa body kit, GT3 front bumper, JRZ coilovers, lower stress bars
2003 911 Carrera 4S - TechArt body kit, TechArt coilovers, HRE wheels
1986 911 Carrera Targa - 3.2L, Euro pistons, 964 cams, steel slant nose widebody
1975 911S Targa - undergoing a full restoration and engine rebuild
Also In The Garage - '66 912, '69 912, '72 914 Chalon wide body, '73 914

Last edited by Kirk; 10-20-2013 at 09:46 AM.
Kirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2013, 09:42 AM   #4
Newb
 
V-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: MA
Posts: 168
bad choice of words

Kirk,

While I have enjoyed this thread and the depth of the discussion. I do feel that your few use of words discount this thread and your your participation.
__________________
1999 Boxster Ocean Blue Metallic/Savannah Beige
2001 Harley Davidson Road King w/Ultra Kit Black/Chrome
2004 Jaguar XJ8 Seafrost Metallic Green/Sand
2008 Land Rover LR3 Alaska White/Alpaca
2012 Honda Odyssey Touring Dk Grey/Lt Grey
V-Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2013, 09:47 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 959
Quote:
Originally Posted by V-Rod View Post
Kirk,

While I have enjoyed this thread and the depth of the discussion. I do feel that your few use of words discount this thread and your your participation.
Sorry if I've offended. I've edited my post to tone it down. I get too passionate when it comes to engineering and technical discussions. I just love this stuff!

Kirk
__________________
2000 Boxster S - Gemballa body kit, GT3 front bumper, JRZ coilovers, lower stress bars
2003 911 Carrera 4S - TechArt body kit, TechArt coilovers, HRE wheels
1986 911 Carrera Targa - 3.2L, Euro pistons, 964 cams, steel slant nose widebody
1975 911S Targa - undergoing a full restoration and engine rebuild
Also In The Garage - '66 912, '69 912, '72 914 Chalon wide body, '73 914

Last edited by Kirk; 10-20-2013 at 10:25 AM.
Kirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2013, 10:04 AM   #6
Newb
 
V-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: MA
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirk View Post
Sorry if I've offended. I've edited my post to tone it down.

Kirk
All is good...
__________________
1999 Boxster Ocean Blue Metallic/Savannah Beige
2001 Harley Davidson Road King w/Ultra Kit Black/Chrome
2004 Jaguar XJ8 Seafrost Metallic Green/Sand
2008 Land Rover LR3 Alaska White/Alpaca
2012 Honda Odyssey Touring Dk Grey/Lt Grey
V-Rod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2013, 05:25 PM   #7
Registered User
 
thom4782's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Foster City CA
Posts: 1,099
To me, this whole DOF debate is really simple. If one sets aside all the theorizing about why IMSBs fail and starts from the point where one has installed an unsealed ceramic replacement bearing, the DOF question boils down to these two questions:
  1. Does DOF substantially extend the operating lifetimes of unsealed ceramic replacement IMSBs compared to ones lubricated by being submerged in sump oil and splash oil?
  2. Does DOF create additional risks to engine and IMSB longevity and reliability?
No one that I know of has put a number on the table (or even an estimate for that matter) that answers the first question. If the answer to the first question is "no" or "not by much", then one doesn't need to know the answer to the second question because it wouldn't make sense to take the risk.
thom4782 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2013, 10:17 AM   #8
Engine Surgeon
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
Those 8 balls inside the single row IMSB sure do become "individual components" when they are expelled into the engine oil and create engine wide collateral damage.

Kirk,
You are not the first to point out the outer race rotation Vs inner race rotation. No gold star yet.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
Jake Raby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2013, 09:01 AM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Texarkana, Texas
Posts: 959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby View Post
LN Engineering didn't...
IMS Solution LLC did. LN doesn't sell the IMS Solution, neither does Flat 6 Innovations.
So you are saying that LN and Flat 6 had nothing to do with the development of the IMS Solution??? Just because you started a LLC to cover your other businesses from liability lawsuits means very little if it is still the same people (George Navarro and Jake Raby).

Jake, you didn't answer my question though, do I get the gold star for exposing your super secret, the one that Charles was going to take to his grave???

I can see how this is significant. It should have had an impact on the class action suit against Porsche as their DESIGN is flawed and compromises the bearing! I can also see why Feelyx's idea got bought out for a patent. Yes, he was working on a direct oil feed system, but that's pretty straight forward. The main project he was working on was moving the bearing out of the shaft. He was focused on using a bigger bearing, but his design also moved the rotational point from the outer race to the inner race. I don't know if he realized that this one change would increase the life of the bearing by 20%.

Who has done an IMS change (New Oil Fed Design Idea) - Pelican Parts Technical BBS

Kirk Bristol
__________________
2000 Boxster S - Gemballa body kit, GT3 front bumper, JRZ coilovers, lower stress bars
2003 911 Carrera 4S - TechArt body kit, TechArt coilovers, HRE wheels
1986 911 Carrera Targa - 3.2L, Euro pistons, 964 cams, steel slant nose widebody
1975 911S Targa - undergoing a full restoration and engine rebuild
Also In The Garage - '66 912, '69 912, '72 914 Chalon wide body, '73 914
Kirk is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page