Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-15-2013, 10:00 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King View Post
variocam+?
nope; i have a 3.4L from a '99. i have varioRAM (which is hooked up & functional), but only standard varioCAM.
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 10:25 AM   #2
Track rat
 
Topless's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Southern ID
Posts: 3,701
Garage
A good project to investigate and a common problem on 996/Boxster conversions.

Some observations while running regularly with 3.4L Boxster conversions and 987 Cay S 3.4L:

The 987 has a nice wide, fat torque curve which allows them to put down power early on corner exit. A 996 3.4L tends to have a more narrow torque curve requiring more shifting to stay in the sweet spot. I suspect a well tuned and displacement-matched intake and exhaust along with software remapping will fatten up the torque curve and make the most out of a 996 3.4L in the Boxster.

One problem that has been reported is sonic pulses from the valve train traveling back up the intake and actually fouling the MAF sensor readings. Does the intake require a helmholtz chamber to neutralize these pulses?
__________________
2009 Cayman 2.9L PDK (with a few tweaks)
PCA-GPX Chief Driving Instructor-Ret.
Topless is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-15-2013, 11:17 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topless View Post
One problem that has been reported is sonic pulses from the valve train traveling back up the intake and actually fouling the MAF sensor readings. Does the intake require a helmholtz chamber to neutralize these pulses?
interesting observation; i wonder if that is why there was a resonator on the original intake? anyway, i should be able to log MAF voltage vs. RPM at WOT. if there are any anomalies, i can probably program them out.
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 08:40 AM   #4
Registered User
 
BYprodriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: O.C. CA
Posts: 3,709
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by insite View Post
nope; i have a 3.4L from a '99. i have varioRAM (which is hooked up & functional), but only standard varioCAM.
Insite is your MAF housing tube I.D. 3.5" ?
BYprodriver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 08:52 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by BYprodriver View Post
Insite is your MAF housing tube I.D. 3.5" ?
yup. i use a BMC airbox w/ silicone plumbing to a 3.5" MAF housing.
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 09:19 AM   #6
Registered User
 
The Radium King's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,150
996 is 3.25" ID, no? and, from what i recall about your install, your maf housing is located right after a bend?
The Radium King is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2013, 09:26 AM   #7
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Radium King View Post
996 is 3.25" ID, no? and, from what i recall about your install, your maf housing is located right after a bend?
pretty sure the 996 is 3.5".

MAF sensor should be at least 1 and ideally 1.5 pipe diameters from a bend. in this case, that would be 3.50" - 5.25". i am at the upper end of that range.

EDIT: if you look at the 996 MAF housing, the inlet is a funky shape and VERY close to the airbox itself. probably not a comparable measurement environment to the one below.
Attached Images
 
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page