| 
        | 
 
 
	
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-08-2012, 09:19 AM | #1 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Eureka, CA 
					Posts: 332
				      | 
				
				Quick "De-snorkeling" quesiton
			 
 
			10min. Boxster "de-snorkel" Hack! :: Car & Lifestyle Forum
So a ton of people on here talk about "De-Snorkeling" their air box.  Seems pretty awesome.  And as i have found, it is dyno proven.  However; i see the "snorkel" has a filter like net on the bottom of it.  is that to keep out water?
 
If you de-snorkel it, does more water get into the intake?
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-08-2012, 10:30 AM | #2 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Kansas City 
					Posts: 319
				      | 
			Mine's been desnorked for 5 or 6 years. No issues with water, trash or anything else for that matter. Don't know about any increased hp or torque but the sound is certainly better especially at wot!   
				__________________79 911SC Targa.. gone but not forgotten
 2001 Boxster Black/Savanah Beige
 RoW M030 suspension
 7/15 mm spacers
 Deambered
 Desnorked
 SS door sills
 Debadged
 Clear tails
 Technobrace
 Technobra
 I'll never own another black car!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-08-2012, 10:54 AM | #3 |  
	| Moderator 
				 
				Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: DFW 
					Posts: 782
				      | 
			I've desnorkled mine the day I bought the car. Just yanked the sucker out. No issues with water/debri for me. There was a confirmed dyno test a forum user did a while back on his S model and got 5 whp.Finally: Dyno charts of de-snorked 986S!!! 
Honestly I think it should be no problem if you don't throw cigarette butts out the window or wash your car and spray water directly in the air intake grill.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-08-2012, 11:59 AM | #4 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: VA 
					Posts: 96
				      | 
			Wish there was a video of before and after. I'm not sold on the 5HP, but I'd be interested just for the sound.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-08-2012, 02:21 PM | #5 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Eureka, CA 
					Posts: 332
				      | 
			Hmm, alright!  Thanks guys!  I mean I don't see why not to do it then!!  So easy!  And i mean, if waters not an issue, the sound alone is worth it!  But 5 extra whp would also be awesome :P
 Thanks again guys!!
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-08-2012, 06:03 PM | #6 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Eureka, CA 
					Posts: 332
				      | 
			Come to find out, when I pulled off my vent, i realized the previous owner had already de-snorkeled it!  Thus the amazing sound :P
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-08-2012, 06:12 PM | #7 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Kuna Idaho 
					Posts: 236
				      | 
			I have been debating doing this.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-08-2012, 06:16 PM | #8 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Eureka, CA 
					Posts: 332
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by gomarlins3  I have been debating doing this. |  
As far as I have found on here, there isn't much of a reason to NOT do it.  If you want a little extra sound, and possible a few hp?  Its great.
 
Honestly takes 5-10 minutes from start to finish and only a screw driver to do.  Best bang-for-the-buck modification :P  And if you dont like it, you can just as easily put it back in :P
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-08-2012, 07:04 PM | #9 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: VA 
					Posts: 96
				      | 
			Will removing the snorkle jeopardize the Miles Per Gallon on the car?
		 
				 Last edited by Kianfar; 04-08-2012 at 07:40 PM.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-08-2012, 11:50 PM | #10 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Adelaide 
					Posts: 41
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Kianfar  Will removing the snorkle jeopardize the Miles Per Gallon on the car? |  
Yes, Because you will always want to be WOT just for the sound   |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-09-2012, 06:27 AM | #11 |  
	| Carnut 
				 
				Join Date: May 2010 Location: Utah 
					Posts: 775
				      | 
			I just de-snorked mine yesterday. It was easy to do. Actually I tried last year and that damn snorkel would not budge no matter how hard I pulled and wiggled. So I tried again and this time -on the first try- with really little effort that thing came right off..... go figure! I think the difference was that the car was warm and not stonecold like before.Sound, is about the same. Power, hmmmm, maybe a bit but honestly not sure.
 Also, I did not have the "cup", just the snorkel. The diameter on the inlet is somewhat smaller than at the airbox, I guess it is now just a little better.
 
 Doing this will do no harm IMHO.
 
 Later,
 Andy
 
				__________________'14 Boxster
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-09-2012, 06:35 AM | #12 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: May 2009 Location: Frederick, MD 
					Posts: 1,396
				      | 
			
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by Kianfar  Wish there was a video of before and after. I'm not sold on the 5HP, but I'd be interested just for the sound. |  
i actually posted a video last year of the before (with) and after (without)
 
put the camera behind the seats on the carpet above the engine...
boxster de snork - YouTube 
				__________________"Speed has never killed anyone, suddenly becoming stationary... that's what gets you."
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-09-2012, 06:57 AM | #13 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: VA 
					Posts: 96
				      | 
			^^ you are a good man
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-09-2012, 04:03 PM | #14 |  
	| still plays with cars... 
				 
				Join Date: May 2011 Location: Baden, ON, Canada 
					Posts: 1,088
				      | 
			I've read over the 
 10min. Boxster "de-snorkel" Hack! :: Car & Lifestyle Forum
 
 link several times, the wording of how to remove the "blind" confounds me.
 
 I guess I'm too chicken******************** to break something, I give up after removing the screw...
 
 Help a brother out.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-09-2012, 04:21 PM | #15 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: VA 
					Posts: 96
				      | 
			I have a Exhaust on my car, so I decided to keep it as is. Not going to mess with it. I guess I'm satisfied with the noise level of the vehicle for now.
		 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-09-2012, 04:49 PM | #16 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: May 2010 Location: UK 
					Posts: 874
				      | 
			I don't know if you've seen the air filter, but there's zero chance of a little debris or a water splash getting past that. Just make sure you change the air filter regularly and I'm sure you won't have a problem. 
 That said, I tried taking the snorkel out and to be honest the difference it makes is not terribly dramatic. I think people get a bit over excited by it.
 
				__________________Manual '00 3.2 S Arctic Silver
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-29-2012, 07:54 AM | #17 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Kuna Idaho 
					Posts: 236
				      | 
			DONE!!!:dance:    |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-29-2012, 05:18 PM | #18 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Unionville, CT 
					Posts: 442
				      | 
			I tried it.  I thought it sounded like it had a hundred HP more than it's visual acceleration.   And that resembled the big leaf vac they used for curb pickup in my town.  Nope....didn't like it and put the thing back on.   Maybe sounds better with an S model.
 
 Hey....different strokes for different folks!!!!!
 
				__________________2001 Boxster, GT3 console delete, lower stress bar, RoW M030 suspension package, painted bumperettes.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-29-2012, 07:41 PM | #19 |  
	| Registered User 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Queensland, Australia 
					Posts: 1,522
				      | 
			I did the same as Bobiam - removed it twice and replaced it twice.Yes, there's more induction sound, but bugger all improvement in performance according to my (very) sensitive butt dyno....
 So the snorkel is back in place for good now - at least it can gulp in cool(er) air at the leading edge of the air vent.
 
				__________________2001 Boxster S (triple black). Sleeping easier with LN Engineering/Flat 6 IMS upgrade, low temp thermostat & underspeed pulley.
 2001 MV Agusta F4.
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
		|  04-30-2012, 01:34 AM | #20 |  
	| Ex Esso kid 
				 
				Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: NY 
					Posts: 1,605
				      | 
			I took the little holy water cup obstructing the end of the cone off. Many of the cars of my youth had that same small to large cone on the air cleaner, figured they had to be onto something.
		 
 |  
	|   |   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:06 AM. 
	
	
		
	
	
 |  |