Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Performance and Technical Chat

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-03-2010, 01:04 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 74
986 Non S owners

I have owned my 2.7 since Sept 09 I 've done a few things as far as mods go(see below), I was just curious to see how my car stacks up to 2004 3.2 S, took one out for test drive today. It happened to be the 04 anniversary edition, first turn out of the dealership is the highway so we got right to it. I have heard a few times as of late the S is a BEAST and some other weird over the top stuff, I don't see much difference at all in power... maybe the S has a little more room to run with the extra gear but I would not say I got out of the car and felt the need to trade mine in for a few extra ponies. Anyone else compare their 2.7 to the 3.2 recently?

LB

__________________
01 boxster black/tan- FVD exhaust and ECU tweak, K & N air filter,
de snorked, underpulley, carbon fiber rear wing, H & R lowering springs, lemans rims by victor equipment
lbrown2009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2010, 04:23 PM   #2
07 Carrera S Cab
 
Boxtaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,273
Garage
I've driven the 3.2 986 and 987, and to be honest, wasn't overwhelmed either, but the 3.4L Cayman S I drove did impress me with the power over my 2.7. After I got back into my car, it felt slow. Lol.
__________________
Current: 07 Carrera S Cab in Midnight Blue

Previous: 01 Boxster in Arctic Silver, 86 944 in Guards Red
Boxtaboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-03-2010, 04:33 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 74
drive

so many new porsches sitting on the Jack Daniels lot on Rt 17 in Saddle River, its huge..... full of caymans and 911's, they had the 2008 anniversary 987 in orange on the showroom floor. Someone just traded it in with 10k miles on it, looked sweet, asking 51k little high for me at this time
__________________
01 boxster black/tan- FVD exhaust and ECU tweak, K & N air filter,
de snorked, underpulley, carbon fiber rear wing, H & R lowering springs, lemans rims by victor equipment
lbrown2009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 04:56 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,656
986 is like the old 911, 356 and 550 spyders... they're fun cars at all speeds.
ekam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 06:51 AM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 74
sppmo

you're not bursting my bubble....have you done a test drive to compare them? I can rattle off all my specs and I'm probably not far behind in HP and braking, like i stated in my first post, I have done a few mods to my 2.7 and it feels as though my car compares well with an S.
__________________
01 boxster black/tan- FVD exhaust and ECU tweak, K & N air filter,
de snorked, underpulley, carbon fiber rear wing, H & R lowering springs, lemans rims by victor equipment
lbrown2009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 07:01 AM   #6
JTP
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MD
Posts: 628
I haven't driven a 2.7 but my mother in law used to have a '99 2.5 and the difference between that and my '00 S is enormous.
JTP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 11:49 AM   #7
Registered User
 
JAAY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: shoreham, ny
Posts: 1,619
I'm a proud non - s owner.
__________________
996 3.4 engine with 2.7 986 5speed transmission
Ebay Headers, Fabspeed high flow cats, JIC Cross, IPD Plenum, H&R Coilovers, B&M Short Shifter, AEM Uego Gauge Type Analog, Apexi S-AFC Select, 987 air box, Litronics, 2000 Tails and side markers, painted center console, 18" 987 S-Wheels, GT3 Front bumper with splitter.
JAAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 01:19 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: kansas
Posts: 447
Garage
When I bought my S a couple of years ago I did drive the base and the S back to back. The base was two years newer and I still went with the S. It was a no-brainer. I still wish I could get out of third gear without lugging around town!

sean
SeanZ4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 05:44 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 74
Sppmo

Me too jaay ! Nice choice in rims by the way.
__________________
01 boxster black/tan- FVD exhaust and ECU tweak, K & N air filter,
de snorked, underpulley, carbon fiber rear wing, H & R lowering springs, lemans rims by victor equipment
lbrown2009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 06:54 PM   #10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 74
sean

i should have worded my question a little different, "modded non-s owners" should have been the title, I've got a little more HP with the FVD muffler, FVD ECU tune and underpulley when compared to the stock base.
__________________
01 boxster black/tan- FVD exhaust and ECU tweak, K & N air filter,
de snorked, underpulley, carbon fiber rear wing, H & R lowering springs, lemans rims by victor equipment
lbrown2009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 07:37 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: California
Posts: 76
I haven't found many Boxster S's or Caymans as fast as my 2.5

grantsfo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 07:45 PM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 74
whatcha got under the hood? I mean behind the seat?

I like the tinted front lights lol
__________________
01 boxster black/tan- FVD exhaust and ECU tweak, K & N air filter,
de snorked, underpulley, carbon fiber rear wing, H & R lowering springs, lemans rims by victor equipment
lbrown2009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-04-2010, 08:42 PM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: The City
Posts: 1,084
Garage
hes got a 2.5!
Lobo1186 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 08:18 AM   #14
Registered User
 
jacabean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: mass
Posts: 731
i have owned a 2.7 3.6 and currently a 3.2 986 . You need to take more than a test drive to see the difference. the 2.7 loves to spin but the 3.2 makes much better torque. in real world driving i am confident to say the S will smoke the 2.7 . the 3.6 is on a different level all together and can not be compared to the 2.7 and 3.2
jacabean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 09:02 AM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 101
Looking at wiki the '02 base is 228 HP, '00 S puts out 249 HP, '02 S 255HP. My car had some tuning done by the previous owner, I would really like to cruise in an 00 S and then an 02 S and see how close my base comes to the S. Also I have heard sentiment that the 5sp is a better transmission, so it may be possible that a 2.7 base with some performance mods is more desirable or ate least more fun for my purposes than a 6sp S. But again, I'll have to see what my butt dyno tells me and how much my face hurts from grinning like a fat man at a hamburger buffet.

Regardless, I'm extremely happy with my 2.7L. Mulling over UDP and possibly upgrade the plenum.

Problem about HP is that you never want to go backwards. How ruined would I have been if I started out the sportscar endeavor by getting the 996 Turbo cab?
__________________
'04 986 Aero - Seal Metallic Gray
Fabspeed: Maxflo Mufflers, Headers with sportcats, Tips; Alpine & Infinity sound
davemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 09:21 AM   #16
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 7,243
I have a lowly 2.5 and it's a tad underpowered for city driving but more power than I know what to do with on a track or the Tail of the Dragon. In fact, if I lived near the TOD I'd never yearn for a larger motor in my car or a Cayman S or 911.

I must say though, when I get into the boxster after driving my BMW 550i with a beast of a V8 in it that goes like stink even though it's a heavy sedan (0-60 in 5.0 seconds flat) I am left feeling a little underwhelmed with the power of the 2.5.

What I try to do is remind myself of the TOD and track time when I cruise around town in the boxster. It's just not designed for city driving.
RandallNeighbour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 10:31 AM   #17
Crazy Austrian
 
harryrcb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 269
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by lbrown2009
i should have worded my question a little different, "modded non-s owners" should have been the title, I've got a little more HP with the FVD muffler, FVD ECU tune and underpulley when compared to the stock base.
There is your answer, if you put the same mods on the S then you would notice a huge difference you have to compare apples with apples
harryrcb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 10:42 AM   #18
07 Carrera S Cab
 
Boxtaboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 2,273
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by davemon
Looking at wiki the '02 base is 228 HP, '00 S puts out 249 HP, '02 S 255HP. My car had some tuning done by the previous owner, I would really like to cruise in an 00 S and then an 02 S and see how close my base comes to the S. Also I have heard sentiment that the 5sp is a better transmission, so it may be possible that a 2.7 base with some performance mods is more desirable or ate least more fun for my purposes than a 6sp S. But again, I'll have to see what my butt dyno tells me and how much my face hurts from grinning like a fat man at a hamburger buffet.

Regardless, I'm extremely happy with my 2.7L. Mulling over UDP and possibly upgrade the plenum.

Problem about HP is that you never want to go backwards. How ruined would I have been if I started out the sportscar endeavor by getting the 996 Turbo cab?
An 02 base has 217hp.
__________________
Current: 07 Carrera S Cab in Midnight Blue

Previous: 01 Boxster in Arctic Silver, 86 944 in Guards Red
Boxtaboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 02:12 PM   #19
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 101
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxtaboy
An 02 base has 217hp.
I did get that number from wiki and a few other sites have posted that as well fwiw. Looks like some sites got it wrong.

Carspecs:
'04 228HP
'02 228HP
http://www.carspecsdirectory.com/Porsche.htm

CarGurus
'04 228 HP
'02 217 HP
http://www.cargurus.com/Cars/Specs-c3393-2002-Boxster.html
http://www.cargurus.com/Cars/Specs-c3386-2004-Boxster.html

Wikipedia
'04 228 HP
'02 228 HP
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Porsche_Boxster


Regardless, I'm with the OP, curious how much a difference there is in an '00 S, '04 S and a 2.7L with some quality performance tuning.
__________________
'04 986 Aero - Seal Metallic Gray
Fabspeed: Maxflo Mufflers, Headers with sportcats, Tips; Alpine & Infinity sound
davemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2010, 02:30 PM   #20
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Monroe, NY & Boynton Beach, Fl
Posts: 26
Base '03 986

I've tried the 987 S but not a 986 and while nice felt the biggest difference in first. I've had my '03 for almost two years and really haven't felt an overwhelming need for more hp.
The prior owner had chipped the engine and upgraded the exhaust. While I have not had it on a dyno, my mechanic said it felt more like an S than a base. Maybe way I didn't feel a big difference.
Recent article I read believe in Excellence compared the base to the S and had a hard time justifying an additional $10 for the S.
I love working the gears and feel I have to a bit more than I would in an S. My base is lowered with H&R springs, skirts, spoiler, seats from a 911. Also replaced radio with Nav unit., speakers and amplifier.
She is my queen and would have a hard time parting with her even for an S.
The spread in horsepower in nominal and my base has more than enough torque for driving.

BTW, I drop into Jack Daniels every now and again and your right they have a ton of cars most of which I believe are way over market. They continually call me to "upgrade" my base but other than a '06 S that was white with coca interior and top that I drooled over nothing has swayed me from my "base" baby.

Burt

__________________
Ruby
'03 Artic Silver base Boxster
PSS9, short shifter, performance chip, upgraded to Navigation and bluetooth, side skirts and spoiler, power 8 way seats from 996
Ruby is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page