03-29-2010, 04:23 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5
|
Exhaust recomendations for an 01 Boxster S?
Hi everyone. I just purchased a 2001 Boxster S and I would love to hear recomendations on Exhaust systems for it. I'm looking for a throaty sound and a few extra HP would be welcomed.
Doc
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 08:40 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Queensland, Australia
Posts: 1,522
|
Jake Raby's dyno says that the standard setup is VERY difficult to top.
But if its sound you want, including the dreaded 3000rpm drone, there's a hundred different views on this site......
Search for Pedro's Garage exhaust mod which is relatively cheap compared to some.
__________________
2001 Boxster S (triple black). Sleeping easier with LN Engineering/Flat 6 IMS upgrade, low temp thermostat & underspeed pulley.
2001 MV Agusta F4.
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 08:47 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: dallas
Posts: 182
|
Maxflo hands down.
|
|
|
03-29-2010, 09:37 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Clarksville, Tn
Posts: 339
|
See my mods. Get them and you will be very happy!!!
__________________
'13 S - Guards Red / Luxor Beige - Options - Loaded to the Hilt!!
'01 S - Guards Red / Beige - Surrendered - 04.18.12
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 01:54 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 165
|
It is true, the stock setup is hard to beat.
I have however changed the headers for some cheap Chinese ebay specials, exceptional for the price. I have also removed the catalysts and put 2" bypass pipes in their place.
More power? Maybe a little. Better sound? It is louder, more throaty and metallic like a Porsche should be, but without the drone like a ricer. This I attribute to the muffler remaining stock.
To be quite honest it was more trouble and cost than it was worth, for little benefit, but it was fun to tinker around with it.
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 04:11 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Madison, Georgia
Posts: 1,012
|
I have headers, no cats and a modified stock muffler and I think it is the best setup for the money. I too would like a bit lower tone at low rpms but not at the cost of a droning exhaust. My current setup sounds stock until you put your foot in it and then it is plenty low and plenty loud.
__________________
2001 Boxster S 3.6L, Zeintop
"Calling upon my years of experience, I froze at the controls." - Stirling Moss
|
|
|
05-13-2010, 10:24 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Redmond Wa.
Posts: 3
|
2001 boxster S exhaust
Hi, I have installed a set of BB headers for a 2.5 with that cat system and a factory S sport mufler and rased fuel pressure about .3 bar. The dyno gain was 12hp peak and 17hp at 7200 . Note, I did have to extend the wires for the O2 sensors . The sound is very good , I enjoy driving my S with this setup.
Last edited by Boxster..S; 05-13-2010 at 10:39 PM.
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 04:07 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 164
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Tinker
Jake Raby's dyno says that the standard setup is VERY difficult to top.
But if its sound you want, including the dreaded 3000rpm drone, there's a hundred different views on this site......
Search for Pedro's Garage exhaust mod which is relatively cheap compared to some.
|
Is there somewhere we can find this data? I've looked around and haven't been able to find his dyno results.
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 04:36 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,581
|
I doubt he has posted much on the subject
as all it will do is create controversy.
I will admit to talking to him while he was doing these tests ... he was looking for the best combination for a friend's car that would be both road and track. And he was expecting to find a brand he could recommend. His tests disqualified droning exhausts as they had to be driveable. He was surprised at the results of his tests as, of course, they contradicted all the advertising claims.
Your ears only have so many vibrations built into them .....
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 05:13 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5
|
Thank you all for the responses
This gives me a starting point to research options. Any other ideas are welcomed!
Doc
|
|
|
03-30-2010, 06:03 PM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
|
The dual canister FabSpeed setup (complete with secondary cat bypass pipes) sounds phenomenal with none of the dreaded drone just under 3000RPM.
__________________
Boxster S
|
|
|
04-01-2010, 09:24 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
|
On a serious note, there is an infinite number of after market cat-back exhausts out there, all of which claim to increase power and improve sound. I think that its fair to say that the prevailing reason why most of us upgrade our exhaust is to improve "sound".
Certain that it is, early on in your research, you will quickly learn that the mere mentioning of the word "sound" in the same context as "exhaust", will incite vigorous debate with regard to the best sounding product. I can tell you from experience, if you choose to upgrade your vehicle's headers and cats, it is no easy task designing a "system" that will result in both improved performance, as well as safety and reliability.
|
|
|
04-07-2010, 09:01 AM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: The Woodlands, TX
Posts: 9
|
I had REMUS on my M3 and plan on adding it to my boxster as soon as i purchase the car... really throaty at idle and plain raspy at redline!!!
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:29 PM.
| |