04-17-2010, 07:11 PM
|
#1
|
2001 RUF 3800S
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 326
|
nice results. I have my pulley sitting in a box for my 3.2, waiting for a nice day to install it.
__________________
IG: RUF3800S
|
|
|
04-17-2010, 08:34 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
|
RSS also makes a harmonically dampened underdrive pulley, designed for the M97 3.8 motors, that fits just fine on any of the rest, provided you use the longer bolt.
Seems like a pretty good idea to me to get some damping onto the crank in these things.
__________________
Boxster S
|
|
|
04-18-2010, 02:48 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 916
|
"RSS also makes a harmonically dampened underdrive pulley, designed for the M97 3.8 motors, that fits just fine on any of the rest, provided you use the longer bolt. Seems like a pretty good idea to me to get some damping onto the crank in these things."
would this help those of us with lightweight flywheels to dampen some of the harmonics normally handled by the DMF?
Ed
__________________
My Car Webpage
2000 2.7L Boxster 102K; TTP intake, headers, high-flow cats; Dansk high-flow muffler; Autothority ECU chip; TechnoTorque 2; Bilstein coilovers; Racing Dynamics strut brace; stress-bar suspension kit; Aasco lightweight flywheel, B&M short shiftkit; 18" wheels; spare tire delete; OEM GT3 seats; JL audio speakers and subwoofer; Alpine PDX-5/PDX-2 amps; Kenwood DNX8120 CD/DVD/Nav; litronics, deambered
|
|
|
04-18-2010, 07:41 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by edevlin
"RSS also makes a harmonically dampened underdrive pulley, designed for the M97 3.8 motors, that fits just fine on any of the rest, provided you use the longer bolt. Seems like a pretty good idea to me to get some damping onto the crank in these things."
would this help those of us with lightweight flywheels to dampen some of the harmonics normally handled by the DMF?
Ed

|
Yes. Hence why it's on my motor
__________________
Boxster S
|
|
|
04-18-2010, 01:27 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: California
Posts: 713
|
Cloudsurfer, what are your driving impressions with the harmonic RSS unit?
__________________
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3420/...90927559_o.jpg
Some stuff for sale: M030 S 24mm front sway bar, M030 base 19.6mm rear sway bar, 996 GT3 OEM Porsche Motorsport front strut mounts monoball "camber plates"
WTB: looking for some 5-7mm spacers with extended bolts
|
|
|
04-18-2010, 03:18 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Depends on the day of the week....
Posts: 1,400
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chaudanova
Cloudsurfer, what are your driving impressions with the harmonic RSS unit?
|
Not sure yet, I'll let ya know once I get the car running again!
__________________
Boxster S
|
|
|
04-20-2010, 06:57 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: California
Posts: 73
|
Ed,
What clutch did you use with the LW flywheel? I opted for the Sachs 6 spring clutch to (hopefully) mitigate possible harmonic issues.
kj
|
|
|
04-27-2010, 05:47 AM
|
#8
|
Engine Surgeon
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland GA USA
Posts: 2,425
|
I haven't stopped the development of the dampened UDP. We are still working on the project as an exclusive product for our updated engine program.
__________________
Jake Raby/www.flat6innovations.com
IMS Solution/ Faultless Tool Inventor
US Patent 8,992,089 &
US Patent 9,416,697
Developer of The IMS Retrofit Procedure- M96/ M97 Specialist
|
|
|
04-27-2010, 06:11 AM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Unionville, CT
Posts: 442
|
I really like the concept of the UDP, but it's difficult to determine the right one to install.
We're debating dampened vs not dampened. Although Jake is interested in developing a dampened pulley, the one that he's been selling (now out of stock) is not dampened. I've looked over the BBI and the RSS and they do not appear dampened (per photos) and I can't find descriptions to say one way or the other. Dampening is adding a complexity, a cost, weight and perhaps a failure point, so I'd say, if you don't need it, don't do it.
Next, there is % underdrive. BBI says 16%, Jake's people said they weren't sure, and RSS is 15%. I'm sure that you can only do so much underdrive % on a street use car before something doesn't work right. But which something, and what affect will that have (electronics, cooling, power steering at idle)? I'd stay on the conservative side on this issue!
On the other hand, contributors to this forum have shared success stories, so far.
My mind is not made up yet!!!!! Need more info.
Bob
__________________
2001 Boxster, GT3 console delete, lower stress bar, RoW M030 suspension package, painted bumperettes.
Last edited by Bobiam; 04-27-2010 at 09:54 AM.
|
|
|
04-27-2010, 10:34 AM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 156
|
I contacted RSS and asked them about this. Below is their reply:
The resulting noise from using a single mass aluminum flywheel will not be reduced by using a dampened pulley. The only way to eliminate the chatter is to go back to a dual mass or heavier flywheel. A dampened crankshaft pulley is designed to dampen engine harmonics. The resulting chatter is from the transmission, hence the pulley will not make a significant reduction in Gear Chatter.
|
|
|
08-07-2011, 06:43 AM
|
#11
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 874
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
I have been developing a harmonically dampened UDP for over two years now.. As soon as I saw the other companies making similar companies I halted the development because theirs is cheaper and few people buy "better" these days.
|
and
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jake Raby
I haven't stopped the development of the dampened UDP. We are still working on the project as an exclusive product for our updated engine program.
|
Sorry, confused, which is it?
Further questions are - is there any value in a damped pulley on an early 986 should I choose to go with an underdrive item and is the Flat-six Innovations the smallest UDP currently available? How much smaller than standard is it? I think it's 4-inch - how much smaller is that in percentage terms? 20%?
Thanks
__________________
Manual '00 3.2 S Arctic Silver
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:43 AM.
| |