Quote:
|
Originally Posted by boxsterz
The orientation of the transaxle is different in the boxster vs. 911. The 911 is rear engine and the box is mid, so you'd have to rework the rotation of the engine I believe. That is what I heard for 911 transplants in boxsters anyways....
|
This is pretty eye opening. I thought the 911 was a mid-engine car just like the Boxster. I've done some reasearch, and found that there's only two shops that can do the reverse rotation. And with high demand, there's going to be high cost. It seems a lot easier and cheaper to swap in a VW transaxle, and reversing the orientation of the spin yourself.
Now, will the VW Beetle transaxle bolt-in into the Boxster chassis?
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by boxsterz
Dimensions for the bare blocks are similar in that both are wide and low. The difficulty I see will be getting all the ancillary components to fit, e.g. A/C, alt., power steering pump. You'll have to be a master at fabing brakets.
Having said all that, I don't know the value in a NA conversion. If you go turbo, with the added complexity, why not look into Buick Grand National power? That's the swap I'd like to make. 600 hp reliably on the bare block internals. Depends on how radical you want to go. If you want insane fast, and don't care about stock, then you have the whole trunk to work with for intercoolers and all. There's not much difference in pricing between 13b and GN, but gobs and gobs more torque and power.
|
As far as any other engine, the reason why I would choose the rotary would be that it is compact, and has "enough" power. A V-type engine has a different center of gravity than a Rotary, and thus changing the handling characteristics. Also, with a V-type engine, the extra height may not clear the engine bay .
-Tahleel
-Tahleel
Threaded Mode
