01-11-2007, 06:24 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
"Would that spell the doom of the rear engined Porsche? It would be hard for Porsche to deal with getting their butts kicked over and over."
Knowing Porshce, they would likely find another series to race in where they don't lose. Or start their own!
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
01-11-2007, 08:41 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Denver CO
Posts: 748
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
"Knowing Porshce, they would likely find another series to race in where they don't lose. Or start their own!
|
I think that's called "Porsche Cup". There are similar series for Ferraris, Mini Coopers, Mazda Miatas, etc, ad nauseum.
I remember years ago when I was running SCCA Solo II, they added the Caterham 7 to the A Stock class to run against the 'Vettes. One of them showed up at a local event and, of course, beat the crap out of all the 'Vettes. Overnight the A Stock entry list went from having a dozen Corvettes to one or two. Nobody likes to have an upstart outsider come in and start mucking up the works in their sandbox.
Porsche, it seems to me, is more tolerant of competition in the classes they run in than most manufacturers. Probably because they have a long history of using racing as a central part of the marketing of their cars, so as a company they have a greater committment to racing.
|
|
|
01-11-2007, 10:17 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
^ that's exactly what I thought of "start their own series" yeah its called Porsche Cup. BTW, the 996 GT3 beat the 997 GT3 in several events last year. Which makes sense since it takes a new model about a season to catch up to a tweaked previous year model. A big reason why allot of 996 GT3 track junkies aren't diving into a 997 GT3 for the big jump in price and non-existent performance advantage over a well modified 996 GT3 that is taking a beating in resale, well this seems to be the case with all PCars minus the CaymanS and the limited production RSR GT3.
Now the only problem is finding if the Speed Channell will even cover the FIA GT races. I would be surprised if Porsche came out on top. The Ferraris were the benchmark on pace and if not for some better team management (Ferrari drivers crashing into each other) Porsche would have been beaten worse.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
01-11-2007, 10:32 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 145
|
ferarri is going to eat porsche's lunch until porsches go to a mid engine design, there is no subsitute for displacement or placement. they have the right idea with the cayman, but if they wanted to keep up the the competition they would put a v8 in there. when i can afford to buy a used bmw 5 series cash, i'm trading in my beloved boxster for a family car with a v8. back to to subject, i still think this article is toilet paper because they dissed the 968, the 968 is one of the best handling cars on the road, even when compared to boxster and for sure an old 911. i bet this pissed off alot of 944/968 owners who hate the boxster.
|
|
|
01-11-2007, 10:36 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Northeast USA
Posts: 910
|
99% of the article hinted and pointed to the Boxster as the winner. The final decision (911) did not follow from the text.
|
|
|
01-12-2007, 06:27 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
One only has to look at Ferdie Piech to understand Porsche, its culture and its direction. And that direction is BACK to the future. Excellence mag is the saddest shill rag I have ever read.
The 911 and its back ass engine placement will still be the favorite son of Porsche when I am long gone dead.
For those of you who like this stuff, follow the VW saga. Bernie was just fired at VW because, guess what, Piech is back in charge. You cannot have anyone in the company that might disagree with him.
What a Palooka.
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
01-12-2007, 06:50 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 8,083
|
Off this mornings wire.
"A management shake-up at Volkswagen AG is putting more power in the hands of its engineering-minded new chief executive officer, Martin Winterkorn, and raising concerns among investors about how aggressively Europe's largest auto maker will continue to cut costs.
Europe's largest auto maker by vehicles sold said yesterday that the head of its core VW brand, Wolfgang Bernhard, would leave the company "by mutual consent" effective Jan. 31, less than two years after taking office and roughly two months after then-CEO Bernd Pischetsrieder abruptly resigned. Mr. Pischetsrieder had clashed with Volkswagen Chairman Ferdinand Piëch over the company's strategy and governance.
Mr. Winterkorn, who officially became CEO of Volkswagen Jan. 1, couldn't be reached to comment and has said little publicly about his plans for leading the company. While Mr. Winterkorn has garnered praise for increasing Audi's sales in recent years, investors question whether he will bring the same energy to cost cutting as Mr. Bernhard, who had taken a prominent role in the effort.
Volkswagen said in a statement yesterday that its new management structure "opens the way for greater synergies" within the company. An aide at the company's communications department said its representatives were traveling back to Germany from the North American International Auto Show in Detroit and weren't available to comment.
Mr. Winterkorn will now lead the VW brand and oversee research and development for the company. Volkswagen also reorganized its brands, putting luxury nameplates Audi, Bentley, Bugatti and Lamborghini together in one division, and mass-market brands VW, Seat and Skoda in another.
IN TRANSITION
• The Situation: Wolfgang Bernhard, who oversaw Volkswagen's biggest brand, departs the company, giving a greater role to Chief Executive Martin Winterkorn.
• What Matters to Investors: Some question whether Mr. Winterkorn will be as effective in cutting costs.
• The Bottom Line: Volkswagen must bring down its costs amid tough competition from other auto makers.
The new structure is the latest sign of the rising influence at Volkswagen of its biggest shareholder, German sports-car maker Porsche AG, and of Mr. Piëch, who is a member of the family that controls Porsche.
Earlier in the week at the Detroit auto show, Porsche CEO Wendelin Wiedeking, a close ally of Mr. Piëch and a member of Volkswagen's board, made clear he would push for "a lot of changes" at Volkswagen. He described VW as a "gold mine" and said he would demand productivity improvements. "I know how to make money," Mr. Wiedeking told reporters.
People familiar with the matter say Porsche officials and Mr. Piëch had argued in favor of the management shake-up, claiming it would promote more sharing of engines and other components between its brands.
As head of the VW brand, Mr. Winterkorn will face major challenges, such as turning around its unprofitable U.S. operations, shoring up its underperforming Chinese business and maintaining its competitiveness against leaner rivals, such as Toyota Motor Corp. At some of VW's German plants, it takes twice as many hours of labor to assemble a car as some rivals' plants require.
Under Mr. Pischetsrieder and his handpicked lieutenant, Mr. Bernhard, the company in recent months has pursued a vast restructuring intended to bolster its profit, which has fallen sharply since the early 2000s. The program involves the elimination of as many as 20,000 jobs, mainly in Germany, over several years; an extension of work hours without pay increases; and steering the VW brand back to its roots as a maker of affordable "people's cars." VW ran into trouble a few years ago when it launched a luxury sedan that flopped.
With Mr. Bernhard out, some investors worry the company's progress on those fronts may stall. One source of concern is that Mr. Winterkorn played a prominent role in several projects that have contributed to the VW brand's woes, including the ill-fated $68,000 VW Phaeton sedan. Sales were so disappointing that Mr. Bernhard ordered the luxury car pulled from the U.S. market in 2005.
Mr. Winterkorn's "track record on cost reduction is much less convincing than that of Dr. Bernhard," said Stephen Cheetham, an analyst with Sanford C. Bernstein Ltd. in London. "What this [shake-up] shows is that Volkswagen has reached the high-water mark of its restructuring. Investors should be extremely cautious."
The company said that it also set aside a new seat on its management board overseeing its sales activities and that it would create a new management post overseeing companywide production, to be filled by Jochem Heizmann, formerly head of production at Audi. The company said the sales post would be filled "at a later date." The management board runs the company's day-to-day operations.
It remains unclear where Mr. Bernhard will go now. Only 46 years old, he was well-known even before joining Volkswagen for leading a major restructuring of DaimlerChrysler AG's Chrysler division in the early 2000s, before a strategic dispute with his boss, then-CEO Jürgen Schrempp, resulted in his departure from the company. Mr. Bernhard couldn't be reached to comment yesterday."
__________________
Rich Belloff
|
|
|
01-12-2007, 07:59 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 10
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brucelee
Excellence mag is the saddest shill rag I have ever read.
|
I think this statement reflects more about you than the magazine. But, at least I know where I'm not welcome.
I'll just have to hope a few of you enjoyed the reading, as it seems some did.
Cheers...
pete
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:55 PM.
| |