Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-07-2019, 01:16 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 109
986 versus 911

Hello-
I am a fairly new owner of a wonderful 2004 special edition Boxster S, and I cant seem to quite understand the whole "poor mans Porsche" label.
If you search my other posts, I am not new to repair, and did my own IMS.
I just don't understand the label as just about everything on on this car is 911 compatible.

My special edition was made in Finland, but it appears to be spot on.

BR

Blackroot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 02:02 PM   #2
Registered User
 
redciv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Dacula, Georgia
Posts: 264
Hey Blackroot. It is easy to understand, the Boxster is not a 911, that is the problem. If there were no 911 then the Boxster would not have the Poor Man's Porsche label given to it sometimes. At times I use to find myself trying to justify to people about the Boxster, but I don't now. The same way other people don't have to justify whatever they drive. I drive and enjoy.
redciv1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 02:08 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Dahlonega , Georgia
Posts: 1,346
Try driving a 914 or 944 ..... grannies hit you with their unbrellas and school children spit at you To the purists the 911 is the only Porsche to own all other models are less than . I always smile and wave as I blow by them in the beast !!!
__________________
2002 Boxster S Arctic Silver with black top with glass window and black leather interior. Jake Raby 3.6 SS ( the beast ) with IMS Solution. 996 GT3 front bumper , GT3 rocker covers and GT3TEK rear diffuser and Joe Toth composites rear ducktail spoiler .
rfuerst911sc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 02:19 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,492
Enjoy your car! Last summer I went from a 2000 Box S to a 2003 C2 Cab. I couldn’t pass up the opportunity so I’m happy with my decision. That being said, my next car may well be another Boxster S of some sort.
dghii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 02:19 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Earth
Posts: 109
04 special is not slow, and I am proud to drive it after countless working hours.
I want a 911, yes, but this car will never be sold
Blackroot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 02:42 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Ciao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 866
Garage
It depends how you define advantage: Interior- Boxsters are similar to 911s (of similar year); Performance: Mid engine outperforms a rear engine; Price: Boxsters again have the advantage.
__________________
5280 Cruising @High Altitude
Seal Gray & K&N Filter
Ciao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 03:29 PM   #7
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackroot View Post
I cant seem to quite understand the whole "poor mans Porsche" label...
Due to its (now) 50 year history, many believe the 911 to be the only proper Porsche (with a passing nod to the 356).

The Boxster is generally given the label of being "the poor man's Porsche" since it was purposefully designed to be the cheapest of the product line and was marketed to those who couldn't afford a 911. Formerly, this title was bestowed upon the 914 during the 70's and the 924/944 (the "Audi" of Porsche's) during 80's.

I have owned both a 986 and a 996 and despite different mechanical layout, I would say that the two cars were similarly built and appointed. Swap a 3.4L engine into a 986 along with equal sized tires and the Boxster could definitely match or possibly outperform the 996. But there is no doubt that the 986 does not share the 911's heritage.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor

Last edited by thstone; 01-07-2019 at 03:31 PM.
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 03:46 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 13
I own both (2002 boxster s and 2001 911). They both have there place.

I drive the Boxster daily as it just feels more alive and fun to drive. In stock form the 911 is a faster car, but wow the Boxsters predictable and rail like handling is hard to beat.

Now add the wife and we always take the 911, it has a slightly more polished ride, better sound system, and seems to be quieter even with the top down.

I have not had the Boxster on the track yet, but the 911 is a blast on the track. With my VERY novice self in the car, the 911 in the straights and boxster in the corners but I was starting to learn the 911 in the corners.

If I could only have one, I don't know which I would keep, probably the 911 due to the 6 year old claiming it "her" car and loving to go for rides.
RLHornbeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 04:21 PM   #9
Who's askin'?
 
maytag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,446
If the "911" series of cars were the only offering from porsche, I would still be a porsche-hater. They're the camaro of European cars: the "me too" expression in its most obvious form. Why anyone would take that dough and spend it that way is well beyond me.... I can think of DOZENS of cars I'd prefer for the same money. (And I guess I've shown that repeatedly with the other cars I own and have owned)

As someone in another thread said today: it's good we don't all have the same taste, or opinion. Haha

I learned to enjoy porsche as a marque only by experiencing the cheap thrills a boxster offers. There are only a couple of things a man can do with $8k that bring as many smiles as a Boxster S.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

Last edited by maytag; 01-07-2019 at 04:38 PM.
maytag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 04:49 PM   #10
1998 Boxster Silver/Red
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: 92262
Posts: 2,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by maytag View Post
There are only a couple of things a man can do with $8k that bring as many smiles as a Boxster S.
Well said.
__________________
1998 Porsche Boxster
Starter986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 05:16 PM   #11
"50 Years of 550 Spyder"
 
10/10ths's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: The Road
Posts: 918
Don't let other people affect your mood....

With Porsche, it's the 911 folks.

With Ducati, it's the Superbike folks

With Ferrari, it's the V12 folks.

With Corvette, it's the Z06 or ZR1 folks.

Don't worry about what anybody else thinks. They are morons.

Enjoy your wonderful machine.

How many mid-engined, two seat, convertible sports cars have ever been built? And how many of them can we actually afford?

You have a "proper" sports car, with TWO trunks.

Think about this, if you leave out the Carrera GT and the 918 Spyder, the Boxster is the LAST sports car Porsche has ever designed from scratch. And it's the car that saved the company.

They have not designed any new sports cars since the Boxster. The Cayman was just a hard top evolution of the Boxster. And the 986 was a "PURE" sports, designed by Porsche when their back was against the wall and they needed a home run to save the company. It was the very best they could do at the time. And they nailed it.

Next time some Gucci wearing car snob talks trash about your "...Porsche with panties on it" as they said on the "The Sopranos", just smile and say, "Yeah you're right, I guess that's why Porsche made the new RSR mid-engined, just like my Boxster, to try to win LeMans."

And chuckle as you drive away.

__________________
550 SE #310---"It's more fun to drive a slow car fast, than a fast car slow."
10/10ths is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 05:25 PM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,492
"If the "911" series of cars were the only offering from porsche, I would still be a porsche-hater. "

I would have agreed with you years ago but the 911 kind of grew on me over the last 5 years or so. the 911 was never the car I hoped to own one day...wasn't even that much of a fan of the style. After owning the Boxster for 10 years and finding out that I could maintain it myself, I begin to look at 911's as a viable alternative as I found the 996 variant was as much a 'red headed step child' as the Boxster.
Given the 'unlove' the 996 has endured, it seemed to be worth considering, knowing it would be very Boxster like in terms of feel and maintenance. Why not give one a try?

I am not disappointed.

That being said, a well loved and cared for Box in the ~$10K range cannot be beat. Hands down the most bang for the buck one can find. The Box owes no apologies. I look at used ones every night and would buy one to replace the 911 in a heartbeat if the right opportunity came up. In the mean time, I'll enjoy the heck out of my 'real' Porsche!

Last edited by dghii; 01-07-2019 at 05:26 PM. Reason: typo
dghii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 05:58 PM   #13
Registered User
 
jmitro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: OK
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by dghii View Post
Hands down the most bang for the buck one can find
agreed. I owned two different 996s and really loved them. The aero kit 99 C2 especially was a beauty; but I sold it and bought a project 99 base Boxster. it's 3/4 the fun of a 996 at 1/2 the price
__________________
07 Porsche Cayman S speed yellow
87 Porsche 924S Carrera GT project/ 951 engine transplant
2015 BMW X5
jmitro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 06:19 PM   #14
Who's askin'?
 
maytag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Utah
Posts: 2,446
Quote:
Originally Posted by 10/10ths View Post
With Porsche, it's the 911 folks.



With Ducati, it's the Superbike folks



With Ferrari, it's the V12 folks.



With Corvette, it's the Z06 or ZR1 folks.



Don't worry about what anybody else thinks.
Right!?
We just finished one of these on the JEEP forum..... which jeeps are "real" jeeps. My wife's renegade is so disrespected, you can't even get a "jeep wave".... haha.

To be frank though: porsche owners tend to be (at least in my 9 months of ownership experience) the least snobbish of any group. My first PCA event (intermountain region) the were a couple of 944's that couldn't have been worth more than about $3k, and a couple of nice GT3RS or some- such designation (I honestly can't keep track of all the levels of offerings) in attendance. Nobody seemed to care who had the most or least expensive cars.... they just enjoyed that we were all there. Ferrari people aren't like that.... hell, you show up in a $60k f355 and you'll get ignored and spurned by the 458/488 crowd.... ducatisti all dismiss non-superbikes (until you blow past them on the racetrack on a 2- valve air- cooled, haha).....it's all silly.

Porsche-philes figured this part of it out. It's made me enjoy the experience just that much more.



Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
maytag is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 06:24 PM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,533
The Boxster has always been deliberately de-contented from/by the factory so as not to interfere with the greater profits from selling a 911.

I never wanted a 911. I owned a 986 and 986S for road use, not track. Only bought the S because I totaled the '99 base and the insurance payout was more than enough for the '01 S. I prefer the lighter convertible form and the two trunks for 2 person get-aways.

We are really fortunate to be able to own either.
mikefocke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 07:19 PM   #16
Registered User
 
KevinH1990's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,658
I suspect that most people who make negative comments about Boxsters have never driven one. When I was in high school someone made a remark about a friend’s girlfriend. My friend turned to him and said “Don’t complain about steak when you are eating Spam.” Maybe I’ll say the same thing next time someone makes a negative assessment of a Boxster.
__________________
2000 Arctic Silver/Black, Hard Top, On Board Computer
PNP Rear Speakers, HAES 6-Channel Amp, Avic Z140BH,
Painted Bumperettes, 2004 (OEM) Top, Homelink integrated in dash with Targa switch, 997 Shifter, Carrera Gauge Cluster with silver gauge faces, heated 12-way driver & 8-way passenger seats, Litronics, silver console

Last edited by KevinH1990; 01-07-2019 at 07:32 PM.
KevinH1990 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 09:07 PM   #17
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
Quote:
Originally Posted by maytag View Post
To be frank though: porsche owners tend to be (at least in my 9 months of ownership experience) the least snobbish of any group.
I'm glad that you've had a great experience thus far. My personal experience was not the same. I had an owner of a 997 tell me to my face that my 996 was a piece of schit.

But as 10/10s stated, not only does this happen in every group, it keeps going and going. The 911 guys quickly group into air-cooled vs water cooled. And then the air cooled guys group into long hoods vs short hoods while the water cooled guys group into GT-3 and not-GT-3.

And you'd think that I'd be one of the cool kids since I daily drive an air-cooled 911, but you'd be surprised at the off hand remarks that I get about driving a 911SC (also known as the poor man's air cooled G-series 911). Its endless!

The best thing to do is to rise above it and be confident in the decisions that you made with your own money and for the experiences that you have had in the car of your choice.
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor

Last edited by thstone; 01-07-2019 at 09:13 PM.
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-07-2019, 11:39 PM   #18
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Pomona Ca
Posts: 15
Well after reading a few post, My .02 I've owned a few 914 (have a 1973 2.0 now)
and a 2000 Boxster 3.4 FUN FUN FUN.
of all the cars I've owned the 914 was the only one I missed driving.
But now that I have the boxster....WOW!
Love it.
and yes some people kid me...
oldschool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 02:18 AM   #19
MYRX
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Winterville, GA
Posts: 44
Good reading. I am an ex Corvette Z06 guy that did a lot of time trials. Time to think about retiring so I sold the Z06. I started missing not owning a sports car. Initially I was looking at 1998-2002 911's. This past November I purchased a 2000 S 986. Very nice condition with IMS already replaced in October of 2018. Got to say, I really enjoyed driving to work, (I live in outside Athens GA so nice country rds). Ill keep the 986.. It was the best deal for the $ I wanted to spend. I am proud Porsche owner now!
MYRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2019, 02:56 AM   #20
Registered User
 
flouese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Callahan, FL
Posts: 460
As the owner of a 1966 912 and a 1999 Boxster base, I thought the 912 was labeled as the "poor mans Porsche". Try buying parts for the 912, cant be a poor man to afford anything 912 related, i.e. $450 for a crappy looking hood badge. Serious?

__________________
99 Boxster base
1966 912 3 gauge
flouese is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page