08-14-2014, 05:35 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Paltz, NY 12561
Posts: 935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA
I fix them for a living, and yes there are better cars than this one, just as there are better IMS bearings than the OEM unit (one company has already has over 18,000 replacements installed), and considerably better oils than Mobil 1.
But if you want to continue to drink the Kool Aid, be my guest........... 
|
JFP, wasn't there some info. about the zinc content being harmful to the catalytic converters? Seems like we change problems, any insight?
Allen
__________________
'02, Arctic Silver/Graphite Gray, 2.7, TIP, 2nd cat delete, Charlie Chan muffler,de-ambered, Braille Battery, clear tailights, painted bumperettes, clear third brake light, M030 sway bars, F shock tower braces, clear rear deck, '03 side vents.  15mm spacers fore & aft.
|
|
|
08-14-2014, 08:57 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Allen K. Littlefield
JFP, wasn't there some info. about the zinc content being harmful to the catalytic converters? Seems like we change problems, any insight?
Allen
|
Yes, zinc is poisonous to catalytic converters, but the case for removing or lowering its content in engine oil is vastly overblown. By EPA law, the OEM manufacturer's are on the hook for the catalytic converters for 80,000 miles if they fail. So they lobbied the EPA to get zinc in the form of ZDDP reduced or even eliminated in engine oils on the basis that doing so would improve emissions by protecting the cats, and the EPA bought it. While it is easy to prove that the zinc kills the cats, the OEM's argument was purely a "straw man" to get out of having to pay for them if they crap out before 80K. If you watch how many cats actually fail early, you would see that not that many do, it is common to see cars in excess of 150K miles and the cats are fine. And of the cats that do fail, reports have noted that many of them failed because of gas additives, not zinc poisoning.
So we get saddled with low ZDDP oils, or oils with other metal salts replacing the ZDDP. Unfortunately, these alternative oil formulations do not demonstrate the same wear reduction characteristics that oils with high levels of ZDDP have, and often break down earlier, requiring shorter oil change intervals.
Based upon what we have seen, I prefer to stay with high ZDDP oils. ZDDP is very hard to beat for wear protection, I am yet to see anyone equal its performance with alternative compounds. And at the end of the day, the cats are a lot easier to replace than rebuilding or replacing an M96/97 engine.
__________________
“Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
|
|
|
08-14-2014, 09:49 AM
|
#3
|
On the slippery slope
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Austin and Palm Springs
Posts: 3,797
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA
Yes, zinc is poisonous to catalytic converters, but the case for removing or lowering its content in engine oil is vastly overblown. By EPA law, the OEM manufacturer's are on the hook for the catalytic converters for 80,000 miles if they fail. So they lobbied the EPA to get zinc in the form of ZDDP reduced or even eliminated in engine oils on the basis that doing so would improve emissions by protecting the cats, and the EPA bought it. While it is easy to prove that the zinc kills the cats, the OEM's argument was purely a "straw man" to get out of having to pay for them if they crap out before 80K. If you watch how many cats actually fail early, you would see that not that many do, it is common to see cars in excess of 150K miles and the cats are fine. And of the cats that do fail, reports have noted that many of them failed because of gas additives, not zinc poisoning.
So we get saddled with low ZDDP oils, or oils with other metal salts replacing the ZDDP. Unfortunately, these alternative oil formulations do not demonstrate the same wear reduction characteristics that oils with high levels of ZDDP have, and often break down earlier, requiring shorter oil change intervals.
Based upon what we have seen, I prefer to stay with high ZDDP oils. ZDDP is very hard to beat for wear protection, I am yet to see anyone equal its performance with alternative compounds. And at the end of the day, the cats are a lot easier to replace than rebuilding or replacing an M96/97 engine.
|
that being the case, what are the oils with highest ZDDP?
__________________
2004 Boxster S 6 speed - DRL relay hack, Polaris AutoTop DIY
2004 996 Targa Tip
Instructor - San Diego region
2014 Porsche Performance Driving School
2020 BMW X3, 2013 Ram 1500, 2016 Cmax, 2004 F-150 "Big Red"
|
|
|
08-14-2014, 10:23 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayG
that being the case, what are the oils with highest ZDDP?
|
Some of the Motul products, Joe Gibbs DT40 or "Hot Rod" oils.
__________________
“Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
|
|
|
12-30-2014, 06:53 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Houston
Posts: 370
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JFP in PA
Some of the Motul products, Joe Gibbs DT40 or "Hot Rod" oils.
|
They don't specify the ZDDP amounts in their specs though. Unless it's listed somewhere else I haven't found?
__________________
DD summer/winter: 2000 Boxster S
DD spring/fall: 914-6 w/ 3.0L SC Dual Webers
http://imgur.com/a/k0Wtl - My 914-6 Build/Project Story
|
|
|
12-31-2014, 02:13 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,605
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by patssle
They don't specify the ZDDP amounts in their specs though. Unless it's listed somewhere else I haven't found?
|
We had them tested.
__________________
“Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
|
|
|
08-14-2014, 10:53 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: New Paltz, NY 12561
Posts: 935
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayG
that being the case, what are the oils with highest ZDDP?
|
Go back and read post #20. I think all those oils have increased levels. Correct me if I am wrong JFP or anyone else knowledgeable along these lines.
AKL
__________________
'02, Arctic Silver/Graphite Gray, 2.7, TIP, 2nd cat delete, Charlie Chan muffler,de-ambered, Braille Battery, clear tailights, painted bumperettes, clear third brake light, M030 sway bars, F shock tower braces, clear rear deck, '03 side vents.  15mm spacers fore & aft.
|
|
|
08-14-2014, 11:36 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Arlington Heights, IL
Posts: 1,561
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JayG
that being the case, what are the oils with highest ZDDP?
|
Motorcycle oils. Diesel oils.
For example, with Mobil products:
0W40
1,000 ppm phos.
1,000 zinc
5W40 Turbo Diesel
1,100
1,200
20W50 V-Twin (motorcycle)
1,600
1,700
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:18 PM.
| |