|
View Poll Results: Should a Photographer blur the license plate of track photos
|
|
Yes
|
  
|
12 |
25.53% |
|
No
|
  
|
23 |
48.94% |
|
The driver should remove the plate
|
  
|
13 |
27.66% |
|
The photographer should not take pics if he wont blur the plate
|
  
|
5 |
10.64% |
08-06-2014, 09:10 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 487
|
Seems the responsibility should fall to the driver to remove it, but a courteous and decent photog would ask before going public with images of someone else's car / tags at a private event, and only a total jerkwad would post someone else tags if specifically asked not to do so.
On the other hand, if you made a video strictly for private and personal use (ie NOT youtube) that incidentally happened to include someone else's tag, I don't see much harm if you can and will keep it private. After all, you were there, and are entitled to your memories, no matter how they are achived.
I know someone will ask "does the same logic apply in the bedroom?" No, there you need consent from both parties for even the private archive, precisely because the potential for both harm and abuse is higher.
|
|
|
08-07-2014, 05:28 AM
|
#2
|
|
I am my own mechanic....
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 3,432
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BrokenLinkage
Seems the responsibility should fall to the driver to remove it, but a courteous and decent photog would ask before going public with images of someone else's car / tags at a private event, and only a total jerkwad would post someone else tags if specifically asked not to do so.
On the other hand, if you made a video strictly for private and personal use (ie NOT youtube) that incidentally happened to include someone else's tag, I don't see much harm if you can and will keep it private. After all, you were there, and are entitled to your memories, no matter how they are achived.
I know someone will ask "does the same logic apply in the bedroom?" No, there you need consent from both parties for even the private archive, precisely because the potential for both harm and abuse is higher.
|
I do not 'post' things except here and another site. No FB, no Youtube. Even if I did, if I was invited to an event where cameras are welcome, there is no damn way I am blurring out some plate some driver was too lazy to obscure or remove, no matter how much they whined or cried about it. If it means that much, deal with it yourself. Call me a jerkwad I guess........
__________________
'04 Boxster S 50 Jahre 550 Spyder Anniversary Special Edition, 851 of 1953, 6-sp, IMS/RMS, GT Metallic silver, cocoa brown leather SOLD to member Broken Linkage.
'08 VW Touareg T-3 wife's car
'13 F150 Super Crew long bed 4x4 w/ Ego Boost
|
|
|
08-07-2014, 07:43 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
|
at a track day, blue painter's tape works fine. Otherwise you had your chance.
If a car is photographed in public, you're also SOL as you have no expectation of privacy in public.
If you're the photographer and take your own picture, of your car on your property, with the plate on and post it online you're taking an unecessary risk for no good reason.
and let just add, all databases have been hacked. Public, corporate and especially govt.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:24 PM.
| |