Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 12-22-2013, 09:54 AM   #2
Certified Boxster Addict
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,669
I have a Boxster and a 996.

My understanding is that the M96 engine issues with cylinder walls were early failures and pretty much sorted out by 1999. Even less concern if the car is still running well today.

Of course, the 3.4 M96 engine has all of the same concerns as the 2.5/2.7 Boxster engines in terms of intermediate shaft bearing, timing chains tensioners, etc. The Turbo engine doesn't share these same concerns.

My 99 996 has 132,000 miles (original IMS bearing). It runs great and I use it as a daily driver. Of course, your mileage may vary.

The Turbo is, as you note, a completely different engine that changes the dynamics of the 996. The 01 Turbo 3.6 isn't just an enlarged version of the 996 3.4, its a version of the GT-3 racing-based engine and is considered to be the "real deal". To some, that alone is worth the price of entry into Porsche Turboland.

Most people would love to have your problem (986 + 996 3.4 OR 996 Turbo)!
__________________
1999 996 C2 - sold - bought back - sold for more
1997 Spec Boxster BSR #254
1979 911 SC
POC Licensed DE/TT Instructor
thstone is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page