Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-31-2013, 09:29 AM   #1
Registered User
 
tnoice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 355
It made up my decision and my wife and I decided to go ahead and have the IMS Solution done. My Boxster is a low milage, single row, 3.2.

If I boarded a jet and the pilot came on the intercom and said...."well there is about a 90% chance we will not have a cataclysmic failure with this jet." Sorry, I would turn around and get off the plane immediately! Granted, if the jet goes down it could be the end your life, where a destroyed engine is not.....but it would definitely hit most people's check books and investments pretty significantly. Especially if you account for the lost in future earning potential of the $20,000 spent on a new motor!
__________________
Lov'n my boxster!

2013 Lexus IS350awd
2007 Toyota FJ Cruiser
2004 Porsche Boxster S
tnoice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 09:44 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Perfectlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,709
You should not forget that those estimates were of failures reported to Porsche or addressed by Porsche in their engine warranty program. Those estimates do not include all of the failures that occurred after the warranty period expired. This might be 'tip of the iceberg" estimates for at least the single row bearings if more failures occurred at high mileage or after the fourth year.
__________________
GT3 Recaro Seats - Boxster Red
GT3 Aero / Carrera 18" 5 spoke / Potenza RE-11
Fabspeed Headers & Noise Maker
BORN: March 2000 - FINLAND
IMS#1 REPLACED: April 2010 - NEW JERSEY -- LNE DUAL ROW
Perfectlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 10:10 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 598
Perfectlap, you are no doubt correct that the numbers are incomplete and therefore undereported, but I would not refer to them as the 'tip of the iceberg'. Porsche's numbers include all cases which ended up at a Porsche dealership (or with a claim or request for coverage after the expiry of the warranty period), regardless of age and mileage. Did some people not take it to the Porsche dealership after failure, or even try to get something out of Porsche? No doubt. But most people would have done one, or both (and there are certainly reported cases where Porsche provided full or partial coverage after the warranty expired - albeit, typically only for those who purchased the car new). So if an additional 25% or even 50% of failures never came to Porsche's attention, it takes 'much less than 1%' to what - maybe 1%? You're right, however, that a 25 - 50% increase on the published numbers for the single-row bearing would make a bad situation worse - ie, if 50%, then 8 - 12% becomes 12 - 15% Still unlikely, but.....

Brad
southernstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2013, 10:49 AM   #4
Registered User
 
woodsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Land of naught
Posts: 1,302
Non-gambling man

Don't let the 'stats' lull you into a false security- Watch that video! And if you really want your car, take the REASONABLE path- before it's too late. If you can't afford 'the' catastrophe, than choose the solution.
__________________
Death is certain, life is not.
woodsman is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page