Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-2012, 10:27 AM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 188
I was peripherally connected to the GM Exploding Side Saddle Gas Tank litigation 15 years ago or so. People were getting blown up or burned alive in their GMC pickups because of a faulty design that more than one GM engineer had warned about in writing. Unfortunately, management ran the numbers and decided that a recall of however many million trucks were affected would be much more expensive than the cumulative cost of the litigation of the small number of people who would be burned to death in the trucks.

I say all this to say that juries are very impressed by such revelations, and tend to reward plaintiffs rather handsomely (to the tune of 9 figures in the Shannon Mosely case, including $101M in punatives!) But when a bunch of "rich" guys get stuck having to buy engines for their out-of-warranty Porsches, that's a lot tougher sell. Bank on it: a class-action or an individual lawsuit against PAG is a non-starter.
NoGaBiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 11:27 AM   #2
Ex Esso kid
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 1,605
No lawyer here, just saying that when Kodak was sued they used the council they kept on their own staff to dissuade further action and mute the complainers. As for the engines I'm quite sure when a 986 is sitting on a DEALER lot they don't make any mention that a thousand miles from now if it explodes you is on " yur own", seems like that might thwart sales. I'll go to the grave saying they owed everyone at the very least a communication in response to the problem being reported.
Ghostrider 310 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2012, 11:49 AM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 188
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ghostrider 310 View Post
No lawyer here, just saying that when Kodak was sued they used the council they kept on their own staff to dissuade further action and mute the complainers.
Not sure what you're talking about (Kodak is probably sued weekly, or were when they were a relevant company), but what I'm pretty sure they didn't do is go into a courtroom and try to represent themselves in class-action litigation. It's kinda like asking the service writer (who knows a lot about Porsches and is very familiar with what the parts are and has maybe helped a tech do an oil change, and is excellent at managing the work of the techs) to perform a G50 transmission rebuild on an 88 Carrera 3.2 with his own two hands.
NoGaBiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page