12-15-2011, 06:18 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 153
|
First off, I think it looks really great! I haven't seen a Boxster look I prefer in any significant way since the 986, until now. I'm really happy that some shots I saw of the tail lights clad with some crazy hardware design turn out to by b.s. Seriously, I thought someone was crazed.
As far as the elimination of the clamshell, how would the roof work then??? Not the Spyder, so what are you guys thinking on that? I'm sure someone else less technical out there is thinking the same Q or am I just stupid?
Blue, the 2 pics you posted sure look nice as well. Are those competitors really coming in 2013?
As for the Boxster vs Cayman, I've not owned a Cayman, but I love the convertible more than I ever thought I would. Love the sun, so can't imagine wanting the Cayman when given the choice!
__________________
Barkinfool
'02 Boxster S
|
|
|
12-15-2011, 06:35 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Novi Mi.
Posts: 194
|
Is it just me? this thing looks HUGE. the 2012 looks allot bigger then the 986 & 987 and the price is creeping up as well. I think Porsche is making the new Boxster bigger to raise the price higher to make room for a new smaller Boxster. hopefully it will be lighter and cheaper as well.
The new 911 is bigger and is more like a GT car then a sports car and the prices are going up as well. I wish Porsche would make a small lightweight car in the $40k price range. like the Lotus Elise.
|
|
|
12-15-2011, 06:36 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 153
|
Oh, and forgot there was something I'm not sure I liked. Anybody think the spoiler looked too weak & delicate. Just a thought....
__________________
Barkinfool
'02 Boxster S
|
|
|
12-16-2011, 05:40 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Southern New jersey
Posts: 1,054
|
A bit off topic, but I keep hearing comparisons to the Lotus on this site, and how the Boxster should be more "stripped down" and lighter. Why didn't those who want a "race care for the street" but a Lotus to begin with? Is it the cost, and relative rarety of Lotus cars? It seems that it would save effort of trying to strip weight from their cars. I'm not being confrontational, just honestly curious.
|
|
|
12-16-2011, 04:12 PM
|
#5
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stephen wilson
A bit off topic, but I keep hearing comparisons to the Lotus on this site, and how the Boxster should be more "stripped down" and lighter. Why didn't those who want a "race care for the street" but a Lotus to begin with? Is it the cost, and relative rarety of Lotus cars? It seems that it would save effort of trying to strip weight from their cars. I'm not being confrontational, just honestly curious.
|
Porsche built it's name by building little light cars that could outrun the big engined Mercedes, Auto Unions, Ferraris and Maseratis. The German Lotus, if you will. We know they can build small, extremely fun cars that are as tough as bank vaults. They just don't do it and I know it's because of a drive for larger sales numbers and more market share. They're not building sports cars any more and it's dissapointing. Corvettes are lighter than 911s. That's not right.
I'll be buying an Elise when I replace the Boxster, but I'll be loosing the tight, solid structure, the intoxicating engine noises, and the ability to get into a fender bender and NOT total the car. Or maybe I'll get the Alfa instead and just deal with Italian build quality.
Last edited by blue2000s; 12-16-2011 at 04:58 PM.
|
|
|
12-18-2011, 09:24 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Novi Mi.
Posts: 194
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue2000s
Porsche built it's name by building little light cars that could outrun the big engined Mercedes, Auto Unions, Ferraris and Maseratis. The German Lotus, if you will. We know they can build small, extremely fun cars that are as tough as bank vaults. They just don't do it and I know it's because of a drive for larger sales numbers and more market share. They're not building sports cars any more and it's dissapointing. Corvettes are lighter than 911s. That's not right.
I'll be buying an Elise when I replace the Boxster, but I'll be loosing the tight, solid structure, the intoxicating engine noises, and the ability to get into a fender bender and NOT total the car. Or maybe I'll get the Alfa instead and just deal with Italian build quality.
|
blue2000s, you hit the nail on the head, Porsche built some fast lightweight cars that were built like tanks and were simple.
I love the lines on my 986, I can not say the same about the new 2013 Boxster, hopefully it will look better in-person.
As for the Elise, I own a 2006, it is an assume Little car, but not a car for everyone, I bought mine because it was and is everything that I was looking for in a sports car. My boxster is my DD and my Lotus is my weekend toy and track car. I feel I have the best of both worlds.
|
|
|
12-16-2011, 06:13 AM
|
#7
|
Porscheectomy
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Seattle Area
Posts: 3,011
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by barkinfool
Blue, the 2 pics you posted sure look nice as well. Are those competitors really coming in 2013?
|
The first car is the 2014-2015 Lotus Elise.
The second is the 2013 Alfa Romeo 4C.
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:18 AM.
| |