Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-07-2012, 11:24 PM   #1
2K9ATE6
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Tuscaloosa Alabama
Posts: 4
Garage
What a thread! I wish I found this sooner!

I must say this is quite a thread. I only wish I had come across it sooner! I have been playing with intake modifications since June, trying various tweaks etc. I have been wanting to do a plenum upgrade, but after recently installing (in my garage) a Spec 3+ clutch, LWFW, IMS replacement, & semi solid trans mounts, I couldn't justify spending another $900 on the aftermarket plenum options right now. I first came across this thread a couple of weeks ago and immediately ordered the required parts from dealer and a used throttle body from Oklahoma Foreign. Came out to less than $275 for shipping and all.

Post installation, I love the upgrade. After disconnecting battery and completeing the circuit between the disconnected cables (reset fuel trims/maps etc), I drove vehicle 50 miles without "hard" acceleration (hard enough to map pedal positions etc though) so the computer could make its adaptations. It was a long 50miles, but I wanted to observe the "butt dyno" without the computer inefficiencies blurring my perception of increases. But then I let her rip. The car seems significantly faster in the 3,500-5,500 RPM range. The speedometer often jumps 4-5 miles per hr at a time in 2nd and 3rd. The rest of the range feels improved as well, but at 3,500-5500 it rockets off. Lower end power had dropped before this mod due to an aftermarket intake, but feels improved now. Stock intake still provides for a torquier low rpm range but I am rarely below 3300 or so rpm so it doesn't bother me at all. LWFW makes up for it on uphill starts.

As I mentioned earlier I have been playing with intake mods for several months trying different things. It's surprising how the smallest change can make a drastic difference. The new TB obviously requires a 50% intake redesign. I have tested everything from modifying the OE tube to ABS pieces routed in all ways possible. I still haven't settled on a final setup but am close. I looked at all the aftermarket intakes out there and saw inefficiencies or some sort in each. I still have to make it pretty but it is pointless until I settle on a final design. I wanted the following things out of the intake:
-no hard 90 degree bends
-smooth airflow surface
-no diameter restrictions less that of throttle body
-100% outside air consumption

Currently, I am still working to meet all of these criteria at the same time. My setup as of now from throttle body to vent in fender:
-Like others I put a specter hose in order to fit new TB (only temporary; I tried the ABS tubing first but took it off after 100 miles because I didn't trust it to hold due to tight areas and "making it fit")
-factory MAF housing removed from air box
-KN Apollo filter with inlet tube extending almost out to vent cover

I Know, I know. You aren't supposed to use oiled filters etc. I have researched this until blue in the face and decided to use one. KN has done extensive research on this and if anyone has the incentive to disprove this and the funds required to perform scientific tests, it is KN. They say it doesn't hurt them and if you think that the oil ruined yours to send it in and let them break it down and diagnose it. I've read plenty of posts from people who used them without any issues. It's a fragile part indeed however I think people are too quick to blame their filter oil. I've got 12k miles on an oiled filter without any MAF issues.

I've come to decide that silicone tubing in as few pieces as possible is the way to go. I put the Spectre piece on while I figure out the best way to proceed with tubing. Any recs on where to find long pieces of 3.25 ID with built in gradually curved ends? Two pieces of silicone tubing between tb and MAF is the best thing I can think of other than having a 1 peice tube custom made (which takes months I think). ABS has good sound but gets too hot with little room for insulation. Spectr flexible tube is too narrow plus it seems the wire ribbing would cause all sorts of turbulence.

I initially used a KN Dryflow filter but replaced it with Apollo for better heat shield fitment. The Apollo has got to go though because its outlet is my greatest restriction at about 2.5". The Dryflow was a little larger outlet but a much larger filter surface area. In retrospect I miss the Dryflow because the idle sounds it produced were intoxicating. It had that low rumble/gurgle of a rich A/F mixture. I have never gotten so many compliments on anything in my life. The Apollo killed that sound. I'm still deciding on the best option for an air filter/box. Any recommendations? I'm hoping to make my 3rd filter purchase the charm haha. I would love to hear input on intake ideas and experiences. I've learned a lot over the past several months and I'm sure others have too. Maybe with our combined inputs we can come up with an ideal intake setup to compliment the throttle body and plenum? Thanks for the great info guys. The tb upgrade is definitely worth it. Almost ready for a tune to make it all work together

Let me know if anything needs clarification. It's late and I have been trying to cover everything on my mind. Hopefully it's coherent and I am not delusional . gdnite
2K9ATE6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 05:14 AM   #2
Registered User
 
Johnny Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
Garage
In the end, who is using what for TB diameter ?
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
Johnny Danger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 03:00 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Speedster986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 24
JD

Need your insight on plenum upgrades for a Boxster 2003 2.7L.

I've read your past history comments & questions on this topic.

So what did you decide to do and what were your results?

Thanks for your help!
Speedster986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 04:21 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Johnny Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedster986 View Post
JD

Need your insight on plenum upgrades for a Boxster 2003 2.7L.

I've read your past history comments & questions on this topic.

So what did you decide to do and what were your results?

Thanks for your help!
I've haven't done anything in the way of a larger TB or plenum at this point. So, I have nothing to offer in that regard. The only changes/upgrades that I have made to my vehicle relevant to this topic, is the addition of the EVO cold air intake, along with Pedro's TT2. It's difficult the quantify the overall improvement of these upgrades based on hp figures alone by virtue of the fact that they coincided with other upgrades. However, I can say that I'am please with the results. I do, however, hope to install a larger TB and plenum in the future.
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
Johnny Danger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 05:21 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Speedster986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 24
JD

Thanks for your response!

Does your vehicle pass smog requirements in your state?

I'm located in So. California, which there is a chance that I my NOT pass my next smog inspection.
Speedster986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 06:18 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Johnny Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedster986 View Post
JD

Thanks for your response!

Does your vehicle pass smog requirements in your state?

I'm located in So. California, which there is a chance that I my NOT pass my next smog inspection.
So far as I'm aware nothing that has been proposed in this thread should have any bearing on emissions compliance - even Commifornia.
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
Johnny Danger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 05:50 PM   #7
Registered User
 
Speedster986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 24
JD,

Once I get a parts list together, I will be sure to forward it on to you.

I'm not far from completing that task, all I really need is to hear from a few the guys i.e. The Radium King, Homeboy981, AndyA6, etc.

I'm leaning towards a TB 74mm from a GT2 to replace my stock TB 68mm. But pulling the rest of the set up is still work in progress.

FYI - Since the my plenum upgrade in Nov. 2012, I have been averaging 23 City 37 Hwy.

Have you ever used the Porsche OBC to calculate MPG?

If so, what are your results?

Thanks!
Speedster986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 06:20 PM   #8
Registered User
 
Johnny Danger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 4,810
Garage
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedster986 View Post
JD,

Once I get a parts list together, I will be sure to forward it on to you.

I'm not far from completing that task, all I really need is to hear from a few the guys i.e. The Radium King, Homeboy981, AndyA6, etc.

I'm leaning towards a TB 74mm from a GT2 to replace my stock TB 68mm. But pulling the rest of the set up is still work in progress.

FYI - Since the my plenum upgrade in Nov. 2012, I have been averaging 23 City 37 Hwy.

Have you ever used the Porsche OBC to calculate MPG?

If so, what are your results?

Thanks!
I suggest that you consult J.Fro also.
__________________
Don't worry … I've got the microfilm.
Johnny Danger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 08:26 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Speedster986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 24
Awesome... will do!

TY
Speedster986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 05:29 AM   #10
Homeboy981
 
Homeboy981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Sherman, TX
Posts: 663
Garage
Here's my version of the Cold Air Intake system.

This is Stage1 - using factory air tubing with MAF in factory location and HUGE air filter!


Large Conical Air Filter - it is 6"X11"...


MI Stage1 uses the mesh "screen" from Factory airbox...


You can see the Air Filter peeking through the Factory Side Intake...


This picture is hard to see but a lot has changed from the Stage1 configuration….

1). The MAF housing has been moved to 1" before the Throttle Body
2). Using a Honeycomb Filter to straighten airflow.
3). Using larger diameter silicone tubing - 4" to 3.25".
4). Although it looks rough on the outside, the inside diameter is SMOOTH.
5). Computer has adapted and I am getting SAME GAS mileage as i did BEFORE change, i.e., 22 city and 26 highway - under not-so-gentle acceleration. Average is 350 miles out of a tank.

LOVE the extra power, especially over 4200 RPM. It flies over to the redline now, instead of loping along to the redline.

Getting a Cat Back exhaust system today so we'll let you know how much she feels after "setting the engine FREE"! Love the car now with more power!

Would highly recommend. It DOES take time to get the intake right. If you need designing yours….PM me for details.

Thanks to everyone who helped!

The Downside: I need new tires now!
__________________
2002 Porsche Boxtser S - Silver & Chrome - Died from IMS failure AFTER IMS was replaced!
Homeboy981 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2012, 06:11 PM   #11
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Frederick MD
Posts: 658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Homeboy981 View Post
Computer has adapted and I am getting SAME GAS mileage as i did BEFORE change, i.e., 22 city and 26 highway - under not-so-gentle acceleration. Average is 350 miles out of a tank.
Wow, I've never gotten mileage like that... Granted, I have a heavy foot...but the best I've done on a tank is 19.5mpg.
shadrach74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 01:23 PM   #12
Registered User
 
Speedster986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 24
Plenum Upgrade Yields More HP & MPG!!!

See my current thread "Typical MPG for a Boxster" under "Performance and Technical Chat".

The strange part of it all... I conducted the upgrade to satisfy by thirst for more HP and ultimately ended up with a "win win" situation!

Since the upgrade in November 2012, increase in performance (NO CEL) has truly been remarkable. My stock 2003 2.7L pulls extremely hard to red-line, improved throttle response & Porsche note enhanced.

Next on my list of modifications for my STOCK 03 2.7L will be to increase the size of the stock 'T' shaped plenum, TB (68mm to 74mm), air tube from the MAF, which will further UNCORK this engine.

Trust me... where I live 91 Octane fuel can average over $4.65 per gallon (soon to be $5.00), so any improvement in engine performance & efficiency is a huge plus in my book.

Typical mileage: 20 to 23 City 35 to 37 HWY (results from 3 months of monitoring via Porsche's on board computer).

Comments Welcomed!

Speedster986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2013, 01:59 PM   #13
Registered User
 
Speedster986's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: So. Cal
Posts: 24
Homeboy-

Now that your mods have running for a couple of months now... how are things running, newly realized issues or concerns?

Can you provide me with a 'final parts list' for this setup.

I'm currently modifying my 2003 2.7L Boxster, so I'm very interested in your design, especially the new MAF location (near TB).

Thanks!
Speedster986 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page