Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

Post Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-03-2011, 03:31 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,650
As long as the CEL is not flashing, it is safe to drive, but I would not be flogging the car until the issue was corrected.
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 03:37 PM   #2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Canyon Lake, Texas
Posts: 801
JFP I completely agree with the vacuum leak theory, but in my case it COMPLETELY fixed these codes. A failed MAF can cause bad readings and make the car adjust improperly, which may lead to odd codes (rich, lean, etc).

I know it seems unlikely, but maybe that's why the people posting these codes on the Internet usually never report back.. they may be chasing the wrong thing.

In my case (only offering suggestions here) is the MAF completely fixed my problem and even fixed my cold start "hunt". Car runs 10x better with the new MAF.

While it's not a cheap part per se, the amount of time, effort, lost weekends, owing friends favors, etc that I put into checking "everything else", I would have much rather spent the $250 up front and chased from there.
stateofidleness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 04:28 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: It's a kind of magic.....
Posts: 6,650
I completely understand your position. I have to go by what I’ve seen and learned personally, and as such have not encountered what you did. We have had several cars in the shop that threw these codes and the owners replaced the MAF only to have the codes come back. When we looked at them, we found air leaks and the codes did not return. But based upon your and other’s experiences, I will have to open up to the possibility that a dying MAF can apparently cause the fuel adaption to change, which can definitely lead to the lean condition triggering the codes.

You live and you learn…………..
__________________
Anything really new is invented only in one’s youth. Later, one becomes more experienced, more famous – and more stupid.” - Albert Einstein
JFP in PA is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-03-2011, 07:32 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Jager's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: California
Posts: 1,859
Garage
I had these same alarm codes not too long ago... Bad AOS.

Fullthrottle52,
Remove your oil fill cap while the motor is running (after it's warmed-up), what happens? Is the cap hard to remove? Does the idle drop (almost stall) after removing the cap?
Jager is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2011, 06:25 AM   #5
Registered User
 
fullthrottle52's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 245
This should be easier with technology we have today.

Jager,

No it does not. I already removed the cap and had normal results, no problem at idle.

Im beginning to think it is a MAF or small vaccum leak.

I'll keep you informed as I get it checked.

Thanks for all the answers.

Thought I would send a pic of my new (used) boxster.
Attached Images
 
fullthrottle52 is offline   Reply With Quote
Post Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page