Go Back   986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners > Porsche Boxster & Cayman Forums > Boxster General Discussions

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 03-14-2011, 10:43 AM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,820
the oil was mobil 1 0W-40. the engine blew in march '09. i drained the oil & collected the sample about 2 weeks ago.

blackstone doesn't develop these engines, but i bet they see a LOT of samples from M96's. it would be interesting to find out what they use for their 'universal averages', as i know they choose different values based on the source of the submission sample.

that having been said, if an engine is wearing heavily, i don't think it takes a rocket surgeon to point out that fact w/ an oil analysis. the materials in the M96 are pretty standard, no?. the only oddity might be the lokasil.

if we had overheating of the oil & metal to metal contact as the result of viscous collapse, i'd think we would see some signs of this in the analysis, possibly impairment of the polymer package that allows multi-viscosity performance (lower flash point, reduced viscosity).

d-chunk obviously would have shown intermix.
__________________
insite
'99 Boxster
3.4L Conversion

http://i156.photobucket.com/albums/t...1/KMTGPR-1.jpg
insite is offline   Reply With Quote
 



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2025 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page