Are Corvettes Reliable? - 986 Forum - The Community for Porsche Boxster & Cayman Owners

Brucelee · 03-11-2010, 04:46 AM

I think the original question is are the corvettes reliable?

jcb986 · 03-11-2010, 06:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brucelee

I think the original question is are the corvettes reliable?

They are...from 1954 to 1967. No electronics or any other modern devices that cost a bundle to repair. A true American sports car then.

eightsandaces · 03-11-2010, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcb986

They are...from 1954 to 1967. No electronics or any other modern devices that cost a bundle to repair. A true American sports car then.

My uncle had a 69 with both tops, factory mags and a four on the floor. The mako body looked cool but the car itself was a very fast rumblebox.

DamageINC123 · 03-11-2010, 02:01 PM

No one builds a V8 like Chevrolet. The LS motors are bullet proof and crank out tons of power with just a few small mods.

The new LS9 with Eaton TVS Supercharger is going to be balistic!!!!

A lot a car for the money!!

eightsandaces · 03-11-2010, 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DamageINC123

No one builds a V8 like Chevrolet. The LS motors are bullet proof and crank out tons of power with just a few small mods.

The new LS9 with Eaton TVS Supercharger is going to be balistic!!!!

A lot a car for the money!!

Nice! I used to be think the same thing, growing up my dad had a lot of chevy's including an SS 396. I do have to tell you though, much to my surprise the 5.0 in my Mountaineer has not only been a fantastic motor, it's a rocket. Call me crazy but even with all the truck weight, in 4WD I'm 100% sure I could smoke my Boxster out of the hole with it.

jcb986 · 03-11-2010, 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eightsandaces

My uncle had a 69 with both tops, factory mags and a four on the floor. The mako body looked cool but the car itself was a very fast rumblebox.

Yeh baby, you could feel the road then. Going 60 felt like a 160. I've built rat rods that you never put foot down...no floor board, all rusted away. It sure was fun back in the 60's. No insurance needed, the cops always wanted to race you. They like showing off their Dodge's with 440's under the hood. Different time and mentality.

eightsandaces · 03-11-2010, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jcb986

Yeh baby, you could feel the road then. Going 60 felt like a 160. I've built rat rods that you never put foot down...no floor board, all rusted away. It sure was fun back in the 60's. No insurance needed, the cops always wanted to race you. They like showing off their Dodge's with 440's under the hood. Different time and mentality.

and how... in so many ways, the people of the current day will never know life without cameras all over the public spaces, being able to smoke and drink, boarding a plane with a friendly hello instead of with half your wardrobe in hand and a courtesy x-ray scan....

Brucelee · 03-12-2010, 03:46 AM

I had several C1s and C2s. There were great looking cars, loads of fun. I remember changing a clutch in my driveway on my 63. Tooks us a couple of hours if I remember correctly. My brother did most of the work, I handed him the tools.

dallison · 03-12-2010, 06:58 AM

the wifey always liked corvettes, but i converted her to porsches. But she likes the power of the cars and i think she drives faster tahn me.

Lordblood · 03-14-2010, 08:14 PM

Hey guys, I've been busy so I haven't been able to get back to you.

It seems like the consensus is that C5's are pretty reliable. I am looking at C5 Z06's around the state for 25k ish. Seems fair to say they will drop a bit by the time I am gonna sell my Boxster (maybe a good 2 years).

I love my Boxster, but I feel like instead of buying another agile handler, I should try something completely different. I feel like the Corvette is the answer to that, extremely powerful and much simpler (a simple V8 in the front, no mid-engined stuff to worry about).

I suppose I will have to drive one myself and see how it is, but I'm thinking about ride quality (I hear its appalling), MPG, and cheapness as well. I have driven some more recent Chevy's (Cobalt, Malibu, HHR's) from rental agencies and have found it cheap, but not unbearable.

JTP · 03-14-2010, 08:56 PM

I hear the newer C5 and C6 Corvettes are pretty decent cars, I haven't driven one yet though.
Couple years ago I test drove a 1994 vette and it was awful. Ride quality was atrocious, car felt underpowered, and every bump and road strip caused shudders to come through the cabin. Lots of wind noise and squeaks in the coachwork. Maybe the car I drove was beat up by the previous owner.

blinkwatt · 03-14-2010, 09:09 PM

@ Lord,

Dude look around the only way you should be paying near 25k for a c5 Zo6 is if it's in pristine,showroom condition.

DamageINC123 · 03-16-2010, 05:19 AM

http://www.playwithcars.com/web/1406/vehicle/431861/1963-Chevrolet-Corvette-V7%20twin%20turbo

This place is just a couple of miles from my office. jay Leno has called a couple times showing interest in the car. This guy has several corvettes.

Oaktown 986 · 03-16-2010, 05:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lordblood

Hey guys, I've been busy so I haven't been able to get back to you.

It seems like the consensus is that C5's are pretty reliable. I am looking at C5 Z06's around the state for 25k ish. Seems fair to say they will drop a bit by the time I am gonna sell my Boxster (maybe a good 2 years).

I love my Boxster, but I feel like instead of buying another agile handler, I should try something completely different. I feel like the Corvette is the answer to that, extremely powerful and much simpler (a simple V8 in the front, no mid-engined stuff to worry about).

I suppose I will have to drive one myself and see how it is, but I'm thinking about ride quality (I hear its appalling), MPG, and cheapness as well. I have driven some more recent Chevy's (Cobalt, Malibu, HHR's) from rental agencies and have found it cheap, but not unbearable.

HUGE fan of small block Chevy's here. Had many, all of which were 100% reliable. I'd definitely own another if I lived in AZ like yourself; all those open highways and freeways are perfect for a Vette. I bet the Boxster feels quite a bit underpowered out there....

swrd911 · 03-17-2010, 05:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lordblood

...
I suppose I will have to drive one myself and see how it is, but I'm thinking about ride quality (I hear its appalling), MPG, and cheapness ...

Why pass judgment on a car you haven't driven? Take a Z06 for a spin and decide for yourself. That's what I did. Ride quality was just fine. The torque/power is intoxicating. Owners report getting 30 mpg on the highway. Blinkwatt is correct, nice C5Z's can be had for closer to $20k. If you don't climb out of the car after a test drive with a big smile on your face, then either you didn't drive it right or you should shop for a Buick.

Based on your original statements, I predict a Corvette will be on your short list. It's on mine.

stephen wilson · 03-18-2010, 04:47 AM

I test drove a 'Vette, along with many other cars when I was shopping last year, you're right about the power, I miss driving a V8 powered car! The main reason I bought a Boxster instead, is the Vette felt much bigger, and I didn't like the shifter at all, very stiff self-centering spring action. I did like the heads-up display though.

Lordblood · 03-20-2010, 04:27 PM

A C5 Z06 Vette is definitely within my top 3 car list for the next purchase. But that date like I said could be a couple of years away. Yeah, the main reason I want the vette is because of the power, all the roads here are completely straight and have very little elevation change. This makes the Boxster feel a bit underpowered and boring, as it takes quite a bit of G force to get the Boxster to come alive. I did love driving it up the mountains though, that was definitely worth all the money I've spent repairing the dang thing :P.